May the better player win

............Never mind the big critics - let's just­ hope that Hewitt really will be proved­ RIGHT!.....
Okay, so you can hardly compare Murray to­ Sampras, but come on, give Andy Murray a chance­ (he's only 22 or 23), we've been waiting too­ long for BRITON to make it to a Wimbledon final!.......

Shut up Hewitt, you're such a hater,..!!
you lost­ your match against roddick, so shut up­ please,..!!
jealous b.i.t.c.h..!!

Roddick is fitter and does have his powerful serve,­ but, as Hewitt alluded to, Roddicks game may not have­ adapted enough for him to progress beyond what he's­ already achieved. Can he alter his tactics if his plan­ A isn't working to match a tennis player like­ Murray or Federer who mix things up? I fear Roddicks­ game maybe to readable because he doesn't change­ things up enough. If he can manage to put Murray under­ some pressure by holdng his big serve and taking things­ to tie break and/or mixing his game at significcant­ points he might surprise us, otherwise Murray will­ surely win in straight sets or for the loss of the odd­ set. However, Roddick has more experience than Murray­ who maybe under more pressure at being in such advanced­ stages of a Wimbledon semi semi-finals, Roddick having­ been here before on a number of occassions.

Can't you guys understand what Lleyton was saying?­ He only just lost to Roddick and knows full well that­ Our Andy plays better than him.

good luck to andy but roddick will not be a push over

By the way, I expect Murray to beat Roddick. If he­ doesn't it's a very bad result for him. Three­ years ago he easily beat him at Wimbledon and Roddick­ is on the decline, Murray has improved drastically­ since then. He also has a very good record against­ Roddick. Only the final will tell us how good Murray is­ on grass, if he gets there. He should but will he?

We (the Brits) always get ahead of ourselves!! So maybe­ we need to stop talking about the Final and focus on­ the Semi-Final first!!!
Murray needs to get through­ the semi first against someone who can obviously play­ well, and is on good form. There are no easy matches at­ this stage of Wimbledon.
Murray may be favourite to­ win, but I am sure that Roddick will be playing out of­ his skin today.
So let's just concentrate on today­ and hope that Murray plays like we know he can do.
If­ he steps up and performs with the form he has been­ showing this year, then I am not sure that Roddick has­ the game to beat him. So fingers crossed he plays­ well!
Best of luck - it would be great to actually have­ someone in the final for the first time in around 70­ years.

By the way.

Then put a lot of money on him

72 I wait for ur response later, and you have clearly­ been blinkered by Tommy Haas and 7/1 bet seems a good­ wager to me.

No 71. You have clearly shown you know nothing about­ tennis. As for Murrays form this Wimbledon, so far he­ hasn't met anyone who had a chance of winning the­ title due to his very easy half of the draw(obviously­ not his fault)In the last match he played a wild card­ ranked 74 in the world. If you're so sure Haas will­ beat Federer why not have a bet on him. The bookies are­ offering 7/1 on Haas winning the match. They say a fool­ and his money are soon parted. And in case you­ didn't know. Roland Garos was clay this is grass,­ it makes a difference as you will see today

Well Murray has had his 1 bad game in the 4th round, i­ hope the occasion doesn't get to him, in the 1/4­ final he was formidable and i think even the Fed would­ not be a match for him. So my prediction is Murray in 4­ sets. To set up a tie against wait for it... Tommy­ Haas, Haas should av beaten the Fed in the French open­ being 2 sets up and then losing. Then i think Murray­ will win in a 5 set epic.
From MCH

Go Roddick, hope you wipe Murray off the court

I think many people are forgetting some wins of murray­ over Federer happened when Fed suffered from the­ disease of Pheiffer?. As for wins over Fed, it has­ always been that way, fed losing to some competitors­ during smaller matches, but when it came down to a­ grand slam, fed was the best. I don't think­ he's really stressed about regaining his crown. The­ only thing that really mattered to him the last 2­ years, was winning Roland garos, the only grand slam­ title that he was missing.I think his victory @Roland­ garros ensures he won't choke again, no matter­ which opponent he has to go against. Federer will­ "suprise" murray fans, as they all think­ murray will win. Unfortunately federer will win in 4­ sets.

Good place for all big and tall singles, please check:­ ---Tallconnect Co M ---- ,More fun waiting for you...

Cheers to Ruler's comments in #64 - if Roddick­ serves well, it'll be an interesting match. Murray­ absorbs pace exceptionally well, and the "new­ murray" is considerably more mature than previous­ iterations. I apologise if you're 18 and hormonal,­ but let's look for a good match between well-tuned­ competitors, and may the best man win. Keep in mind­ that this is sport, it isn't life... I'm am­ American, but I personally look for Murray to prevail­ in this one if he shows up. Roddick's game a bit­ too one-dimensional if it isn't executed­ flawlessly.

Roddick is most irritation to watch=== fiddle ~~­ fumble ~~ fidget ~~ hat + costume

Hopefully amazing­ Andy Murray will ensure Roddick has NO role in mens­ singles final

CONGRATULATIONS TO MURRAY TO MAKE­ SPECTATOR MILLIONS SO VERY HAPPY

Let's see now, Hewitt says Roddick has no chance­ against Murray and basically a dull game.
But, Roddick­ beat Hewitt so maybe he should retire if Roddick is­ that bad.
If Andy can serve well against Murray it will­ be a great match.

post 64, go back to sleep.think you were dreaming when­ you typed your message.lol.