Eurosport - Thu, 02 Jul 12:07:00 2009
Former champion Lleyton Hewitt has backed Britain's Andy Murray to overcome Andy Roddick in Friday's Wimbledon semi-finals.
Hewitt believes Murray is more than a match for the big-serving American and has improved since he defeated Roddick in straight sets in the third round here in 2006.
The feisty Australian also hinted that Roddick's game has hardly altered in the intervening three years.
"I think it's going to be a tough one for Roddick to win. When I've seen Andy Murray at his best, I think he matches up extremely well against Roddick," said Hewitt who lost a five-set thriller to Roddick in the quarter-finals on Wednesday.
"A couple years ago I saw them play here because they were in my section, and Murray took care of him convincingly. Murray's a lot better player now than he was then. Roddick's going to have to play a helluva match to beat him."
Roddick is a two-time runner-up at Wimbledon and is desperate to add to his one Grand Slam title so far, the 2003 US Open.
However, Hewitt believes that the American's game hasn't adapted enough for the challenges ahead.
"His strengths are still the same. His slight weaknesses are still pretty much the same, as well," added the 2002 Wimbledon champion.
"He's maybe trying to stand up in the court a little bit more than he was a couple of years ago, especially returning serve and not trying to get dictated too much behind the baseline.
"He mixes it up well. When you've got a serve like he has he can take a few chances, a few risks on his opponent's service game."
Roddick refused to get drawn into a slanging match with Hewitt over his semi-final chances.
"That's fine," he replied when told of the Australian's opinion. "I'm not here to make predictions."
Comment 22 - 41 of 81
chris heath. What's your point? I think perhaps you're getting at something but forgot to mention it. The English language used in the posts is quite clear. What else? Perhaps Eurosport UK's penchant for blocking so many posts surprises you. I can only say that perhaps this is their British thing. In America, we're used to freedom of speech, but I prefer Eurosport UK because the blogger is controversial and provokes debate. You seem to align yourself with Wimbledon, thus, probably English. You say you're not a tennis fan but you are a fan of Wimbledon. That's OK. Still interested in what you have to say about tennis, so don't hesitate.
Leave the hatred enjoy the match
I don't understand a lot of these comments. Can any of you speak English and, more to the point, can any of you write in it? Would it not be more constructive to discuss the game at some point, instead of just making stupid personal comments about individual players?
I'm not the world's greatest tennis fan (although I follow it in summer, especially Wimbledon). I am aware that Murray has made some stupid comments about the English (which he probably regrets now), but I'll still be rooting for him, because anything is better than the inevitable "Williams v Williams" that we appear to be heading for in the women's final!
Of course, I am aware that Murray will be British if he wins, and Scottish if he loses and, in that respect, the English (and the BBC) need to grow up a bit as well.
I think Hewitt's right. Murray's game gives lot of troubles to Roddick. Roddick lost a couple of matches to Murray already and Murray improved a lot since then.
i think hewitt is right roddicks game hasnt changed really ever since he joined the tour, in the beginning he came with loads of hype from his junior years and never really delivered, in some respects he was lucky if u can call it that when he won his 1 slam, hewitt was burning out and fed was just about to start his domination. i have always liked roddick but have to agree with hewitt, murray is the better player these days and should win, of course there could be an upset but it would be an upset if arod won. lets see.
Oh dear ! Jraykov Comment 10 another one jumping on the 'bandwagon of hate' please quantify your comment about Murrays behaviour being awful ? and do you need to be handsom to be a winner how steriotypical you dullard!
17 you know ? i dont really think that leyton hewitt will read your post ? but !!!! you never know !
sour grapes i reckon, come on roddick thrash him hard
Murray is scotish, not english
comment 33.... what englishman? he's scottish you stoopid fool! dont be classes us with the jocks from north of the border thanx!
i think its great we have an englishman like Murray who has such a great chance of winning, its so good for english tennis !!
go go andy !!
Comment 19 and 21. At the risk of repeating myself I am only saying that if Hewitt thinks Roddick isn' t good enough and he knows his game howcome he lost. As for the smug look it's my opinion and has nothing to do with the game. And you don't know who I am and what kind of tennis I play. So give me a break, will you.
Hey Mr Hewitt,go back to Australia and just continue your
'SOUR GRAPING" outhere,you have nothing to do more in London,but just to express your disappointment,blah blah.Pretty sure,if you just won the match against Roddick,pretty much certain,you won't talk like this about RODDICK,POOR BOY...
Nice reply Roddck. You do your talking on the court. Go and give it your best shot cause nothing is certain.
Lol Roddick beat him, so what would his chances be against Murray. Sour grapes Hewittt...
And why is this an invalid comment and the ones about the playstations and the date sites etc. aren't? What's the matter with you, moderator?
correct: in his carreer
Murray will out against Roddick:):):):) He won't win grand slam is his carreer! He is too less for a title!!!
please leave Lleyton alone!!!!:@:@ He's the best, so leave him alone!!!!!!
ATS AW WEMONS METCHES THA DAIY. FACKAN NAE GUD. AW THUR MANAN OND SREAMAN.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account