Eurosport - Fri, 03 Apr 19:09:00 2009
Frank Hadden could be offered another role within the Scottish Rugby Union after losing his job as Scotland head coach.
The 53-year-old former school teacher's four years in charge came to an end following a meeting of the SRU board in which the country's performance at the recent RBS 6 Nations was dissected.
Hadden was effectively a dead man walking after failing to meet the SRU's minimum requirement of two Six Nations wins per season for the second successive year.
The search has already begun for his replacement, with former England head coach Andy Robinson - currently in charge of Edinburgh - the early front-runner.
But Hadden's future is more unclear as he was set to continue discussions over a future role at the SRU.
Whether that involves coaching or a move to a managerial position remains to be seen but it appears his bosses are keen not to dispense of his services altogether.
SRU chief executive Gordon McKie said of Hadden's departure: "It was agreed with Frank Hadden that a change in head coach is required to allow us to plan fully for the 2011 Rugby World Cup in New Zealand.
"On behalf of the board, I have thanked Frank for his hard work and commitment during his term as national coach."
It was a sad end for Hadden, who was adamant to the last that Scotland had the players capable of challenging for the Six Nations title but were handicapped by the lack of preparation time for Test matches compared to their rivals.
Former Scotland and Lions flanker Finlay Calder was among the first to react to his departure.
He said: "I am sorry to hear the news but its understandable as he has found himself under enormous pressure.
"He has come under sometimes unwarranted criticism and I feel for him. I hope he has come to this decision himself and wish him luck.
"It is very hard to know who might replace him as there is not exactly a queue of people lining up.
"I very much hope that Andy Robinson and (Glasgow head coach) Sean Lineen might consider the position as they are both doing well with their professional teams.
"I am disappointed for Frank and feel it is not a good day for Scottish Rugby."
Hadden ultimately paid the price for distinct lack of progress in terms of results.
He enjoyed a dream start to life in the hotseat following the disastrous reign of Matt Williams, who was sacked in April 2005 after winning just three of his 17 matches in charge.
Former Edinburgh boss Hadden initially took over on an interim basis but wins against the Barbarians and Romania secured him the job permanently.
It got better when victory over France, England - their first Calcutta Cup win for six years - and Italy saw Scotland finish third in Hadden's debut Six Nations.
That really was as good as it got, however, as Hadden lost 21 of his next 32 Tests.
Scotland finished the 2007 Six Nations with the wooden spoon after a humiliating home defeat to Italy, scraped into the World Cup quarter-finals before losing to Argentina, and just only managed to avoid bottom spot in the Six Nations last year on points difference.
Another famous win against England papered over the cracks, and a first ever Test victory in Argentina later that summer was a notable achievement.
More defeats followed and the 26-12 Calcutta Cup loss at Twickenham almost two weeks ago was Scotland's 12th in their last 16 matches, a record only Williams could envy.
Comment 9 - 28 of 28
I agree - the district idea was and is a disaster (hold your hands up Jim Telfer). The bigger clubs should have been left to develop - with SRU funding sent in their direction. That way we could have maintained probably 4 teams in the Magners League (with the possibility of relegation for the lowest Scottish team to be replaced by winner of the national league each season). That would be much healthier.
An unfortunate end to Frank's tenure. There are many wise words printed in this thread. The stupid and unwarranted decision to go down the path of district sides to the detrement of quality clubs. The demise of Borders rugby and the incompetent administration of the SRU. These are the issues that need to be addressed before any progress will be made in the international arena, no matter who takes over at Murrayfield. You can be the best coach in the world but if, come Saurday, a player cannot offload a simple pass for a team mate to score, then all that work is in vain. The players must shoulder the lions share of blame for this years performance although keeping Paterson on the bench for the first 3 games still mystifies me.
Watching the way that Scottish pro rugby is played, there is a problem in our national ability to cope with pressure, absorb it and turn it back against an opposing team. Sure we have surprise results against big teams, but too often we do not capitalise on the opportunities we have. As well as the basic skills of rugby - support in the break, passing, tackling, breaking through and retaining the ball in the tackle - we lack the mental and physical commitment required to be a real physical threat on the pitch. Having said that there is a decent pool of talented players some of whom definitely deserve a place on the Lions tour.
I hope that whoever takes over from Frank Hadden understands the need to work not just on the basic skills of the players and includes work on the players to develop the mental and physical toughness and commitment required to get results or at least challenge teams and make them work damn hard for their wins.
Scotland's population is on par with NZ but scottish coaching, in rugby and football is hopeless. If the emphasis was on quality, not quantity then I'm sure we'd see a different picture. It's disheartening to see scottish players set up great counter attacks against the auld enemy only to either force the pass or just not be aware where their support is. Really basic stuff guys and the person who should take the blame is sitting on top of the pile not wanting to budge. Telfer Oot!
ive haddenuff!!
A nice guy, but nice guys rarely win.
At the moment the team appear to have no self belief that they can win.
The basic talent is there but too many silly handling errors and poor reading of the game lets them down.
Not sure where Scotland go from here. They have some talented individuals, but they don't seem to be able to get over the try line. Scotland have underperformed for the last few 2 seasons under Hadden. Yes they have a talented squad, but they are just not producing it.
The 2 wins target is pointless. The aim should be for the players to go out and perform and show ambition. We are shackled and our targets are too low.
Lets forget results for a while and build a team that can play, not that freeze in site of the line. Having a target to beat Italy and one other team every year is uninspiring and dull.
I could cope with all of our defeats if we gave it our best shot. Scotland are almost trying too @#$% the field at the moment.
Forget ranking and all that nonsense. I used to think WIN at all costs, but now I think lets go out and relax, enjoy the game, get stuck in...but stay loose boys!
Sorry to see Hadden go, unfairily! There were 14 Pattersons missing and that was not his fault. Good luck with new venture Mr Hadden!
hey rugby guys,its a pleasure to visit a sensible and thoughtful forum not filled with the bile on some other sports comments-even tennis would you believe it?
I feel for Frank but how can you choose an International side from 2 teams!! I agree with the the gentleman below/above who said about bringing back the old school teams. This should be our domestic league and then from these teams we pick the Heinekin Cup sides - a bit like NZ and their Super14 sides - and then choose the International side from there! More strength and depth! Also i am sick and tired of hearing Scottish players with foreign acsents! Unfortunately this will be the same old story for Scotland for years to come!
Of course Mr Hadden has the attributes to put Scottish rugby alongside NZ - what he did not have is the money or the clout with the few teams who would provide the players. Look at the demise of KELSO, MELROSE,HAWICK ETC - SORT THAT OUT AND THEN WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE QUALITY YOUNGSTERS TO REPLACE BLAIR, PATERSON, WHITE ETC APPEAR AGAIN!
Not a big rugby fan but a lot of things similar in scottish football. Frank Hadden never picked the brother that scores tries and George Burnley never picks strikers that score ie Kris Boyd that is why he had to go like Craig Brown to loyal to the players that have been playing for year instead of playing players that are playing well
And finally the last bit of the invalid comment nonesense is (because Yahoo would not accept this with my previous message which was of course all of this and the 2 other messages!!!!!!!!
It is no wonder people can fall out using this poor site
The parts missing from comment 15 are
I too have a huge sympathy for Frank Hadden.How can Scotland compete?
No wonder some of these comments seem incoherent as you have to randomly edit innocent comments to get them accepted- a truly poor site, anyone at all listening at Yahoo?
Scotland finished where they should be expected to for the time being just ahead of Italy. If Italy throw money at the sport Scotland will slip behind them and be last.
As a Welshman I have always admired Scotland in the amateur days of turning out such great and gritty teams capable of beating anyone in the 5 nations due to the above restrictions.
Ireland & Wales are in comparison like a divison 2 side in terms of players and money and Scotland are like a division 3 side in terms of money and players. Poor old Frank
Very sad. Coaching Scotland must have been one of the most frustrating jobs in rugby-and that's saying something. A nice guy who deserved better.
Frank Hadden seemed to be developing a coherent approach to team building. He was trying to develop an expanded squad with fairly limited resources. If you have limted talent in key areas you are never fully in control of the game. A coach can never overcome those kind of limitations. In general Scotland seemed a fit well organised unit who were always on the back foot because they were trying to win games against the play. Frank Hadden has been much maligned but without a greater range of professional players to choose from and with limited resources in key areas would another coach have achieved more?
Outside Half
laila,wot if you have no friends,like me?
Haddon obviously missed some basics, here is what he should have told the players ; With the try line in sight don't drop the ball, with the try line beckoning but someone about to tackle you release the ball and allow a team mate to score (Blair ), don't on any account get injured as we have no one to replace you,feel uplifted before the game by enjoying the durge that is our rugby anthem and remember most importantly that you are a professional just like the @#$% that run the S.R.U.
In summary a decent man , a good coach liked by the people for doing a decent job with challenging resources employed by an incompetent indecent employer. If I see Mr Haddon I'll buy him a drink for giving it his best.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account