The row between Rangers and the Scottish Football Association shows no sign of abating after the Ibrox club refuted the SFA's claim that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) could have ruled in the Gers` disrepute charge that has brought the game to the edge of the abyss.
A 12-month transfer embargo was imposed on Rangers over their non-payment of tax last season, but that was overturned in the Court of Session last Tuesday, with the issue sent back to the SFA's Appellate Tribunal.
However, Lord Glennie's ruling appears to have been something of a pyrrhic victory for the Ibrox club.
Rangers, who currently owe more than £21million in tax, face ejection from the Scottish Cup or suspension or expulsion from the game altogether unless the maximum £100,000 fine is found to be sufficient punishment - an extremely unlikely scenario.
Yesterday, Charles Green, who is leading the consortium in place to buy Rangers, had the punitive sanctions in mind when he spoke about possible "disaster" for the club and Scottish football, but claimed he had little option but to go to the civil courts because the "Court of Arbitration in Sport was not open to the club."
The SFA responded by denying the route to CAS was closed off with a statement which concluded: "Indeed, no representation was made by the club to the Scottish FA to discuss the possibility or the process of seeking arbitration via the Court of Arbitration for Sport before Judicial Review was actioned.''
To back up their argument, the SFA will cite 62.2 (m) of their Articles of Association which refer to the powers of the board - "it may submit or refer claims by or against the Scottish FA to arbitration."
However, that assertion has now been rejected by Rangers with a spokesman telling Press Association Sport: "The Court of Session accepted Rangers' position that it had no alternative route of appeal. The judgement from Lord Glennie made it crystal clear. CAS would not have heard the case
"We repeat, we would like to see an outcome where common sense prevails and there is no damage to other clubs in Scottish football.
"Rangers fully accept that there should be a sanction but it ought to be proportionate given the circumstances the club was in ie. it was the victim of misdeeds of individuals who are no longer at the club."


Comment 1 - 12 of 12
ha ha
Blattered?Are you taliking about Dr No?He Canny push his Granny aff a Bus.
The Gers will survive,see you next year.
JAMES.POST 7.... WHAT IS YOUR QUSTION?
Right now Rancers are the laughing stock of football...all they had to do was 'take their punishment like men, BUT no they had to go running to court outside of SPORTand try to bribe the SFA. bottom line is they cheated, they should be stripped of everything they 'won' (haha), and they should also be thrown out...IF (and this is fact) they had been any other team in the league this would have happened, ffs if my memory serves me right, Gretna got thrown out FOR LESS!!!!
'let common sense prevail'......boot them out. blatter will batter them
metz, calling people "timmys", that is bile, your a bigot, stay off the football threads.
Metz. am I reading your post right?. where in these postings is BILE? You either NEED glasses or is just a true MUPPET...HAHA and talking of show ourselves up, YOU REALLY MUST THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK AFTER ALL WHO IS SHOWING THEMSELVES UP US 'FANS, OR RANGERS?
You timmys really need to start reading articles before posting your bile,you showing yourselves up for what you really are.
Rancers..embarresment to the world of football
Crumble in the rumble,only a few more days til Rancers are eviscerated.
Yer gettin Blattered stupit... Big Sepp is gonnae do ye's...
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account