Eurosport - Tue, 05 May 08:21:00 2009
Munster blindside flanker Alan Quinlan has been cited for allegedly making contact with the eye or eye area of Leinster captain Leo Cullen in Saturday's Heineken Cup semi-final.
The independent citing commissioner John Byett decided Quinlan has a case to answer after television cameras appeared to catch him making contact with Cullen's right eye.
Quinlan, 34, has been called to appear before a European Rugby Cup disciplinary panel, which is to be appointed "as soon as is practicable".
If Quinlan is found guilty of the offence - commonly termed eye-gouging - he faces missing the British and Irish Lions tour to South Africa. The minimum sanction is a 12-week suspension.
Earlier this season Northampton and Ireland flanker Neil Best received an 18-week ban and in 2007 Saints hooker Dylan Hartley was suspended for 26 weeks.
Quinlan, 34, was a surprise selection in Ian McGeechan's original 37-man Lions squad.
If suspension was to rule him out of the tour, McGeechan could look to England and Leicester flanker Tom Croft or Wales captain Ryan Jones.
Cullen remonstrated with Quinlan at the time but he was not prepared to comment on the alleged incident after the final whistle at Croke Park.
But Quinlan received glowing character references from his Munster and Lions captain Paul O'Connell and the Leinster coach Michael Cheika.
O'Connell did not see the alleged incident but said after the game: "If it looked bad I am sure there was nothing in it. He is a tough player. It is the one thing he hasn't got in his record book."
Comment 10 - 29 of 29
PS : I have never condemned the man as Scum or anything else - I condemn his actions and his actions condemn him. Up to then I thought he was a hard, very high quality flanker. His actions totally detract from that.
markear1 & ptothej, You are defending the indefensible ! Slow motion reply or not, there is no doubt that Quinlan gouged Cullen - he is 'bang to rights'. Yes, I have played rugby, for over 40 years, and at a very high level in Wales, England and South Africa and against some of the hardest and dirtiest @#$% ever (Bobby Windsor, Mike Burton and Moaner Van Heerden come to mind) and I still maintain gouging is the lowest thing you can do on a rugby field - and it is always from behind, thus making it a coward's action. I stand behind my assertion that, after his actions, Quinlan has no right to be a British and Irish Lion now.
He deserves a ban, it was very deliberate, it was so evident on the TV, Leo Cullan was pissed about it and rightly so, the commentators remarked on it, I guess my main reason is that if he gets banned it opens up for Tom Croft to join the squad, he has to be there with his speed, athletisism, and all round options. Sure it's going to get nasty with the Boks and we need enforcers but I think we have enough of those - O'connel and company can take care of it but we need some match winners such as Croft
Bigrich:I got it wrong about the IRB but Mcgeechan is not judge and jury. An independent committee will decide his faith. I'm not defending what he has done, he will probably get suspended but the knee jerk reactions that you lot are talking about makes it out like he knifed someone in the back. I don't know if any of you guys actually play rugby but I do and the best thing about rugby is that it's extremely physical, sometimes you get caught up in the moment and do something stupid. I know I have. It does not mean the man is scum.
Bigrich, I know exactly what gouging is and the implications.and what mitigating circustances did i attempt to introduce pray tell?
What I'm trying to do is not be such a dramqueen, you see one slow motion replay and you have all the facts? Get over yourself! there's people who know a lot more than you or me about rugby and they have set up a process for dealing with citings. Booting him straight off the lions panel is just rediculous!
ptothej, Gouging is the most despicable thing you can do on a rugby pitch. There is no excuse or mitigating circumstances and you sohould be ashamed that you have tried to do introduce any.
Furthermore, neither his own club nor the IRB have any definitive sanction power in this matter. The game was played under the control of ERC and only they have the power to suspend. I trust and hope they will use it to the maximum.
'hard men don't sneak up and try and maim a player from behind when he is on the floor'
What game were you watching Bigrich?? What I and everybody else saw was a slow motion replay of a close up on Cullens face and a hand drag accross it. I certainly didn't see anyone sneaking up from behind! Did anyone else??
McGeechan has the absolute power to pick or replace any player that he wants. That was the remit under which he took the job of Lions Coach. Quinlan should be removed before the day is out. There is no possible excuse for what he did and there should no route for him to escape the most severe of punishments. How can he ever play with Leinster players for the Lions or Ireland ever again ?
If the powers that be suspend him, I will accept it but it is ridiculous to think that McGeechan has or should have the power to punish a player playing in a club game outside his remit. The IRB or his own club are the only people who can punish him and thats the way it should be.
He must be released from the Lions squad immediately, replace him with Croft. The eye gouging was obviously intentional, Leo Cullen is being a gentleman in his own way by not complaining or stirring up the situation.
I am really concerned about the lack of comments from Orange2Tuf over the last three days following his beloved Munster getting stuffed up the butt and Ronan O'Useless living up to the reputation of arch bottler. Can we organise someone to drag the Shannon because I think he might have jumped in at around 5pm on Saturday !
should o driscoll also be cited for the near removal of o garas ear ?
"He is one of the founding members of the charity to help players how have been seriously injured playing rugby".
Looks to me as if he was trying to recruit Leo Cullen to that very unfortunate group. Cullen could have been blinded, how would you try and excuse that ? As I said below, despicable and cowardly ! And, please don't tell me Quinlan is a real hard man who plays on the edge. He was way, way over the edge and hard men don't sneak up and try and maim a player from behind when he is on the floor, cowards do that ! It's high time we put a years ban on anyone gougeing.
McGeechan must take the initiative and remove him from the Lions squad forthwith. None of this 'innocent until proven guilty' nonsense. Everyone saw the incident on TV and it was a despicable and cowardly action. We do not want individuals who behave like this in rugby.
I am not interested in who replaces him as long as he is replaced - immediately !
Gone................Croft will take his place real shame he was over the moon to be going but the tv is fairly conclusive
ban him and take tom croft a much better open field player and he never lets side down also never seems to have a bad game either
He did it, and he got caught for it. Its a shame for him, with his lions tour gone, but he has no one to blame but himself.
Might I add that Martin Corry was banned even though the contact was deemed to be accidental. I don't know whether he deliberately went for the eyes, but he seemed to deliberately go for the face. He should get banned- a swipe at the face is just as deserving of a ban as someone who eye gouges. The length of ban is the only variant.
Lets not kid ourselves here , Martin Corry has just ended a 6 wk ban for making contact with the eye area , he is 1 of the most honest players ever to take to the rugby pitch , Quinlan always plays on the edge but in real time or slow motion it was intentional , he knows it we all know it , why was he so quick to apologise after the match , reason being he knew what he had done & the consequences were sinking in , he deserves a lengthy ban .
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account