The prosecution case at Harry Redknapp's tax evasion trial is "repugnant to all our basic instincts of fairness", a court heard on Monday.
Defence barrister John Kelsey-Fry QC launched a fierce attack on the Crown for using a News of the World investigation as its "crucial lynchpin" in the case.
"There is an inherent absurdity that shrieks out at you" in some of the allegations that Redknapp took £189,000 in bungs, he told London's Southwark Crown Court.
Betting odds crashed for Redknapp being the next Premier League manager to be sacked two days before allegations were made public, jurors were told. Mr Kelsey-Fry said bookmakers cut bets from 50/1 to evens after a flurry of wagers on the Friday before accusations against Redknapp and co-defendant Milan Mandaric appeared in the Sunday tabloid.
In his closing speech, the barrister said the Crown was relying on "primarily despicable" evidence gathered by reporter Rob Beasley. He said: "I do not shrink from suggesting to you it is repugnant to all our basic instincts of fairness in the criminal justice process."
Referring to interviews carried out Mr Beasley, Mr Kelsey-Fry said: "They saw a great story, all's fair in love and war at the News of the World."
Redknapp and Mandaric, his former chairman at Portsmouth, were an "odd couple" like the old Hollywood film, the court heard earlier.
They were compared to the characters portrayed by Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau as Mandaric's defence barrister Lord Macdonald QC said the prosecution was "really flailing" with "paper-thin" explanations for the Monaco payments.
Lord Macdonald also highlighted Mandaric's multibillion-pound business dealings, saying: "Steve Jobs doesn't work with fools."
"It's really desperate stuff" to suggest Mandaric might have intended the payments as a reward for Portsmouth beating Manchester United, jurors heard.
It also "simply doesn't make sense" that the first payment was a bonus for the £3million profit made over the sale of Peter Crouch from Portsmouth to Aston Villa, Lord Macdonald said. He added: "We say the evidence against him is hopelessly weak."
Comment 1 - 7 of 7
john you are thick redknapp has only ever won one trophy as a manager that dont make him one of the most successful managers, to say that it does is an insult to all the managers who have won more and are not considered as great managers, i bet your a spuds fan, for some reason spud fans think every manager they have ever had are the best.
Harry is a great football manager but an absolute failure as far as financial management goes !! I doubt if he even thought about the tax implications of the payment. Most probably working on advice given by his Boss ( friend ) and relying on his accountants to sort things out.
I also doubt if he would worry about paying tax on this sum considering his total earnings over his career as as one of the most successful managers in the highly paid world of football, knowing full well the implications.
Newspapers working on next strategy to sabotage Englands success in next major competition after
EURO 2012 ?
The only cheating dirty @#$% are the tax people working for the other dirty scum called your lieing cheating goverment.
Scarry Badknapp is guilty. Just look at his face
Harry is innocent, come on lets be serious.
Let Jury decide. BUT TOO MANY PEOPLE ARE ESCAPING THE PAYMENT OF TAX. HARRY MAY NOT BE INCLUDED IN THIS SECTOR. SO THE JURY CAN CLEAR THE MATTER UP. IF HE IS FOUND NOT GUILTY THEN
IN THE FUTURE IT CANNOT BE MENTIONED AGAIN.
They are guilty and everyone in that court knows it, just like we all know it.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account