World Cup 2010 - FIFA block goal-line technology
Football will continue to rely on human judgment when it comes to disputed goals after the game's rule-makers flatly rejected the use of video and chip technology now and in the foreseeable future.
The International Football Association Board voted against two proposed systems on Saturday, and said it would not risk sacrificing the sport's human element.
"It's an end to the potential use of technology within football," FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke said after the IFAB meeting.
"Technology should not enter the game and that was a clear statement made by the by the board."
FIFA has been under increasing pressure to use some form of technology to eliminate the sort of mistakes that are regularly highlighted by television replays from numerous angles.
The most high-profile recent case was a clear handball by France striker Thierry Henry during the build-up to the goal which earned his team a place at the World Cup at the expense of Ireland.
A matter of minutes after the IFAB decision was announced on Saturday, Birmingham City had a goal disallowed in their FA Cup game against Portsmouth when replays showed the ball had crossed the line.
Valcke said the IFAB had decided to postpone a decision on a greater role for the fourth official and on whether to introduce two extra linesmen - one behind each goal - to help increasingly beleaguered referees.
Both proposals will now be discussed at an extraordinary IFAB meeting in May, he said.
Founded in 1886 and seen as the guardian of the rules of the game, the IFAB is composed of the representatives from the FAs of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, each having one vote.
FIFA has four votes and a 75 per cent majority is needed for any proposal to be passed.
Jonathan Ford, chief executive of the Welsh FA, said that debates such as England's third goal in their 4-2 win over West Germany in the 1966 World Cup final were part of the game.
"The human element of the game is a critical component of it," he said. "It's the thing ultimately we end up debating. That's the beauty of the game and it's what keeps people talking in the pubs afterwards."
The IFAB made the decision after watching presentations of two systems - Cairos, which uses a chip inserted in ball, and Hawkeye, currently used in tennis and cricket.
"It was put on ice two years ago and now a decision was made to stop it," said Valcke.
"If you start with the goal line, then any part of the pitch will be a potential space where you will use a video. We're also trying to avoid having many ways of stopping the game."
Each match at this year's World Cup will be covered by 32 different cameras placed at different points around the pitch, Valcke said.




Comment 1 - 9 of 9
hey lush, well said ,every single half brained person on this planet knows fifa is corupt and have ongoing investigations . anyone here know how come nobody says or does something about them??
THE HUMAN ELEMENT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!!!!!
None of the technology manufactures have offerd FIFA a big enough back hander yet.
Not accepting technology and possibility of dissmissing offside in only few days, as retarded as it gets, football is going downwards with current fifa authorities.
Here , Here! Emporer Blatter and the rest of his Sith council can dictate their stupid ideals and reap the benefits whilst real football fans suffer. What is the disadvantage? It takes 20 seconds to look at the monitor and say " Offside", Handball etc. WHAT IS THE 4TH OFFICIAL THERE FOR ANYWAY.
FIFA and UEFA are thieves. FIFA- Forgetting. International. Fans. ASSocociation
idiots
They just need to keep their influence on the results. They don't want some belgiums, usas or irelands in the World Cup Final and with "human mistakes" it's easily achieved. Just take some Ovrebo or Hansson or Kuipers or Jol or...
FUC K YOU FIFA
Good job FIFA. Once again you have completely ignored the views and opinions of some of the most respected players and officials in the game. Even the people that watch the game are more forward thinking. You are their to regulate and oversee the smooth running, efficiency and fairness of the worlds biggest sport. That in itself is a huge responsibility but unfortunately it seems it is a responsibility that FIFA are completely inept at obligating. You are old men with old views who seem content with watching football being officiated by the most archaic methods possible. The question should be,' We all know the argument for introducing technology, what the hell is the argument against it?'. Neither do they offer an answer to this or a solution to ensure we keep up with the modern game. Idiots.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account