Eurosport - Mon, 06 Jul 09:11:00 2009
Roger Federer captured a record 15th grand slam title by winning Wimbledon. This is how he did it.
2003
First title: Becomes first Swiss man to win a grand slam title after beating Mark Philippoussis 7-6 6-2 7-6 in the Wimbledon final.
2004
Second title: Wins Australian Open by defeating unseeded Russian Marat Safin 7-6 6-4 6-2.
Third title: Retains Wimbledon title by taming big-serving American second seed Andy Roddick 4-6 7-5 7-6 6-4.
Fourth title: Wins US Open final by thumping Australian fourth seed Lleyton Hewitt 6-0 7-6 6-0.
2005
Fifth title: Completes a hat-trick of Wimbledon triumphs with a 6-2 7-6 6-4 over second seed Roddick.
Sixth title: Defends US Open title with a 6-3 2-6 7-6 6-1 victory over sentimental American favourite Andre Agassi.
2006
Seventh title: Defeats unseeded Cypriot Marcos Baghdatis 5-7 7-5 6-0 6-2 in Australian Open final.
Eighth title: Keeps up winning streak at Wimbledon by thwarting Rafael Nadal 6-0 7-6 6-7 6-3 in showpiece match.
Ninth title: Downs Roddick 6-2 4-6 7-5 6-1 to clinch US Open crown.
2007
10th title: Wins Australian Open with a 7-6 6-4 6-4 masterclass over Chilean 10th seed Fernando Gonzalez.
11th title: Becomes only the second man in professional tennis, after Bjorn Borg, to win five in a row at Wimbledon with a 7-6 4-6 7-6 2-6 6-2 success over Nadal.
12th title: Beats Serbia's Novak Djokovic 7-6 7-6 6-4 to capture US Open.
2008
13th title: Demolishes Britain's Andy Murray 6-2 7-5 6-2 to win fifth consecutive title at US Open.
2009
14th title: Emulates Pete Sampras by winning a record-equalling 14th grand slam title after beating Sweden's Robin Soderling 6-1 7-6 6-4 at Roland Garros, his first French Open success.
15th title: Breaks Sampras's record with a 15th grand slam win in the Wimbledon final against American Andy Roddick 5-7 7-6 7-6 3-6 16-14.
Comment 45 - 64 of 64
rafaa
basically with federer roddick and nadal playing wimbledon every year, murray aint going to get a sniff at winning it."
are you stupid?
he has 16-1 in tiebreaks in grand slam finals where he has won.
Nadal fans cant take it that Federer is the greatest and that he's back to #1
DON'T CRY LOSERS THERE'S PLENTY MORE OF FED COMING THIS YEAR
WATCH AND WEEP!!! SADDOS!!!
Just take a careful look at the tiebreaks
Just take a careful look at the tiebreaks
Just take a careful look at the tiebreaks
Comments 57 & 58
You miss the point.
Nadal has given his all and will now ( unfortunately) be plagued with knee troubles for the rest of his career.
You should read the story of the "Hare and the Tortoise" -
Fed lost 5 Majors and all of them to Nadal
when Fed 23, he had 4 Major and Nadad has 6 !!
Roger is not only the greatest, he plays the most sensible game - he does not overstretch his physical capabilities. I think Nadal at his young age has already wrecked his knees...even when they heal, they will never be able to continue taking the sustained punishment that propelled Nadal to Nr. 1. Meanwhile Fed. has avoided injury, strains and sprains - he will go on to win more titles - His target is 20 before he retires and he will make it.
The quality of tennis has reached a plateau with Fed. The demands on the human body ( viz Nadal ) will not permit more. Take care Murray, don't bother to chase impossible shots - the success rate of impossible return shots does not warrant the effort or the risk of injury...take a leaf from Fed's book...if you do, you can and will achieve great success.
Up to now, I can't see anyone can match Federer. For those Nadal fans, the first thing Nadal can do now is to come back from injury before predicting anything else.
Congratulations to Roger Federrer for displaying such showmanship even when he's facing a tough opponent like Roddick. Roddick improved by leaps and bounds and also deserves great recognition from all tennis enthusiasts. May they both have wonderful years ahead of them to fulfill their dreams/career; and most of all, the best of health to you both, Roger and Andy!! So great to watch you play on Sunday at the Wimbledon.
Nadal is gonna match n beat federer's record in a couple of years...just you wait!
@ raed i
It's not Fed who claims that he is the best ever to play the game ..
Everyone else does...
And in this era we have a lot of recorders and fine players....
Fastest serve ever
Record number of serves per mach
Record number of "in a row" victories on clay court
Record number of GS titles
And much more records ...
Go back to 70' old man and watch that slow, weak, boring tennis...
@ raed on 49
OMG
No man no...
You were just younger and more enthusiastic about junk and stuff...
This is the best era ever...
New talents, new styles, new moves...
Much stronger, faster and more dynamic game on the court...
In all the sports new generations makes new records... And the games are better and better with each new G...
New players are competing on the foundations of the legends, using and improving their moves and making their own along the way... Now these days the game is so colorful.. Not a boring service volley tennis.
That's the way it is and that's the way history goes..
Forward... Not backwards... Never backwards...
Ure an old man... lol .. Longing for your youth... Hahahahahaaaaa!!!!!!
History is made. We are so lucky to watch the greatest player ever played the game.
Everyone knows deep in his heart that claiming federer is the best ever is just a CLAIM when you are NOT THE BEST IN YOUR ERA it is laughable to claim that you are the best ever. Federer is so lucky that he came in the weakest era of tennis but when a decent player emerged he lost time and again to him and he lost comprehensively when he wanted most to win (5 out of 7 GS finals ) when your head to head record with your direct rival is 7-13 that means one thing and one thing only that is your rival is superior than you. period.
Bjorn Borg was the greatest ever lived in tennis!!!
re:to ilemossoglou_maria
No body who watched tennis would agree with you unless he he is so biased
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account