Wimbledon - Federer takes record with epic win

Eurosport - Mon, 06 Jul 08:00:00 2009

Roger Federer won a record 15th Grand Slam after beating sixth seed Andy Roddick in an epic fifth set 5-7 7-6 7-6 3-6 16-14 in the Wimbledon men's final.

TENNIS 2009 Wimbledon Roger Federer kisses the trophy after sealing sixth SW19 title and record 15th grand slam - 0

Federer's victory was all the more incredible for the fact that he recovered from one set down, and trailed 6-2 in a second set tie-break before he won the next two sets to seize control of a scintillating encounter on Centre Court.

Roddick refused to be denied, and the American fought back against the world number two with ferocious intensity, and clinched the fourth set 6-3 with real conviction.

The fifth set was a positive barrage of aces from the rackets of both players but finally, serving to stay in the match for the 11th time, Roddick was broken as Federer sealed a monumental win.

At 27 years old, Federer has now overhauled Pete Sampras's incredible tally of 14 titles, among which he can count six Wimbledon crowns to surpass Bjorn Borg and Lawrence Doherty's five.

For Roddick, it was a third defeat to the Swiss in finals at the All England Club to follow similar results in 2004 and 2005, and to compound the American's frustration, his nemesis now holds a staggering 19-2 career advantage over him.

The artistry of the Swiss generally trumped the 26-year-old's punch and grit and, in playing in his seventh straight Wimbledon final and record 20th Grand Slam title match, the world number two looked utterly composed.

Both players settled incredibly quickly, finding a good rhythm on serve and looking comfortable in the process, as the first 10 games were rattled through with consummate ease.

Indeed, Roddick did not commit an unforced error until the set was locked at 5-5, despite Federer having sauntered through his service holds in a more serene fashion.

The American was forced to save three break points in his sixth service game, and even had to challenge a line call to save the second, but held his nerve impressively.

Perhaps a touch of complacency set in to Federer's game, as he drilled two erratic forehands wide and long to hand Roddick the crucial break which clinched the first set for the American 7-5, to the crowd's disbelief.

With the second set mimicking the first on the most part, the only game which was not taken with assurance on serve was at 5-5, with Federer double faulting for 30-30, but again he came through unscathed.

Roddick began the second set tie-break with a 143mph ace and, having won 26 out of 31 breakers this season, the American looked invincible as he raced into a 6-2 lead.

The turning point was perhaps an inexplicably mishit backhand volley from the sixth seed, and his four set points slowly and painfully eroded before him as Federer stormed back to clinch the second set with his first opportunity at 8-6.

While Federer proceeded to cruise through his service games at the start of the third set, Roddick was forced to battle valiantly to save a break point at 30-40 in the sixth game, as the Swiss turned the screw.

Roddick showed real resilience in forcing a second tie-break, and this time the roles were reversed as Federer raced into a 5-1 lead, pouncing on two tepid second serves from the American.

The sixth seed clawed his way back into the breaker, and demanded of his opponent that he hold his nerve at 6-5 to serve out for the third set: Federer duly did just that.

Roddick was undeterred by having slipped behind in the match, and broke the Swiss in the fourth game of the fourth set, slamming a backhand down the line to re-exert his authority.

Federer smelt an opportunity after the American had double faulted at 30-30 with a 4-2 lead, but the sixth seed won an epic 21-shot rally with a powerful forehand, and followed it with a booming ace to consolidate his break.

Federer surged into a 0-30 lead with Roddick erring slightly as he served for the fourth set, but the American harried superbly to win an extended rally, and delivered another stunning first serve out wide to take the match into a fifth and final set.

In just the second game of the final set, Roddick continued his unblemished record of saving break points in the match, and rescued a sixth with an emphatic first serve out wide after Federer had won an 18-shot rally with a deft forehand.

Both players refused to compromise on their serves, crunching big deliveries seemingly at will, as Federer unthinkably out-aced his opponent with a count of 50 as the final set coasted along through 6-6 and beyond.

With the set locked at 8-8, Roddick found an exquisite backhand passing shot down the line to prompt two set points, but somehow Federer wrestled his way out of trouble in the manner of an escapologist, holding after deuce.

As both players grew wearier, their impeccable standards finally began to wilt, and two overhit backhands from Roddick handed victory to Federer, his record-breaking victor in the most dramatic manner.

The match was the longest ever men's grand slam final in games, clocking up a total of 77 across five sets, and at 16-14 the fifth set was also a record.

Prior to the final Federer stood, in many people's eyes, on the cusp of ending the perennial debate over whether he is the game's greatest ever player. His record now stands alone.

Dan Quarrell / Eurosport

Comment 412 - 431 of 431

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. There is no doubt Roddick played a great match, his­ variety of serve was amazing. However winning titles­ depends on stamina, concentration and the ability to­ play the important points well. His inability to take­ the set points he had created his problem, and Federer­ simply kept up with him and had the advantage of­ serving first in the final set. But when you look at­ the statistics Federer hit many more winners than­ Roddick, and in the end outlasted him, when­ Roddick's serving percentage dips he will always be­ vulnerable even though his overall game has improved­ immensely. Good on him for reaching the final and­ providing a riveting match.

    From annemcnaughtan, on Thu 9 Jul 1:28PM
  2. ALL TENNIS MATCHES ON INTERNET: AUSTRALIAN OPEN,­ WIMBLEDON, ROLAND GARROS, US OPEN, , DAVIS CUP , FED­ CUP, ATP INTERNATIONAL SERIES, MASTERS SERIES, ATP­ CHALLENGER SERIES, ATP FUTURES SERIES AND MUCH MORE

    From WWW.PREMIERSHIP.ALTERVISTA.ORG, on Mon 6 Jul 6:54PM
  3. I cant understand why people dont appriciate Federer.­ This guy is sooo good he can do everything on court and­ at the same time he's quite modest and not as­ arrogant as many other players that dont even come­ close to Swiss legend. There is no doubt that for today­ he is the best tennis player of all time and though I­ respect Rafa Nadal and really think that he is really­ special tallant and special player I cant compare himto­ Roger. Federers tennis is perfect and thats why he is­ injury free while Nadal will have permanent troubles­ with his physical condition because his game involves­ inormous physical strength. So Federer is perfect he is­ the legend and I advice everyone to love him or at­ least respect;)

    From AvtoT, on Mon 6 Jul 5:36PM
  4. andy roddick was the better player federa only broke­ his serve once as for andy murray someone called him a­ cry baby bet that person is english andy murray his ­ great and one day he will be the greatest

    From byrondavies171, on Mon 6 Jul 1:20PM
  5. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    Nadal - Federer 13-7 and Nadal is 5 years younger too,­ stop jumping on the bandwagon, nadal is already proving­ better and has 5 years to win 9 slam titles to match­ federer's feat yesterday, which he could definately­ beat if fit enough.

    From jayci, on Mon 6 Jul 12:41PM
  6. Action,emotion,passion and a great match!!!!

    From Tham, on Mon 6 Jul 12:37PM
  7. hey people! wake up!....the match was between FEDERER­ and RODDICK!!! WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT NADAL?....and by­ the way if NADAL would have played with roddick hE­ would have lost!coz' andy played great. so shut up­ and be fayr play once for all....BECAUSE IF YO WANNA­ TALK ABOUT NADAL I LL TELL YOU SOMETHING: IF FEDERER­ WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SICK NADAL WOULDN'T HAVE WON­ A THING!!! THE KING IS BACK! YOU LIKE IT OR YOU­ DON'T!

    From lorelai_c_22, on Mon 6 Jul 12:21PM
  8. hey people! wake up!....the match was between FEDERER­ and RODDICK!!! WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT NADAL?....and by­ the way if NADAL would have played with roddick hE­ would have lost!coz' andy played great. so shut up­ and be fayr play once for all....BECAUSE IF YO WANNA­ TALK ABOUT NADAL I LL TELL YOU SOMETHING: IF FEDERER­ WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SICK NADAL WOULDN'T HAVE WON­ A THING!!! THE KING IS BACK! YOU LIKE IT OR YOU­ DON'T!

    From lorelai_c_22, on Mon 6 Jul 12:18PM
  9. To GOD be the Glory.

    From Amaka, on Mon 6 Jul 11:58AM
  10. re: 425 msg... what on earth you talking about, did­ andy murray sign any autographs when he got starched by­ roddick? no instead he swore and acted like a big baby

    From dark_angel9583, on Mon 6 Jul 11:42AM
  11. nothing against nadal or any of the other greats but­ how dare you all put roger ferderer down if the world­ of tennis thinks hes the best of our time then who are­ all you no all f**k alls talking about get a life n­ would love 2 see any of you out there .

    From yolantaemma, on Mon 6 Jul 11:34AM
  12. Although Federer won I think Andy played the better­ tennis and deserved win more than that gold wearing­ p00f, only reason he wins is because everyone gets­ nervous playing him but if they thought differently he­ would get tanned every year.

    From allie8, on Mon 6 Jul 11:32AM
  13. roger is not that much of a snob as why would he be on­ facebook

    From JUNE, on Mon 6 Jul 11:24AM
  14. how manty titles has nadal won and how many fed period­ you muppets

    From james t, on Mon 6 Jul 11:03AM
  15. First things first, what an amazing achievement by ­ Roger Federer, Congrats!!! Second, All I want to say ­ about his personality to all those mispercieving people­ in this forum and on this entire website is that they­ should not CONFUSE arrogance with self confidence.­ Arrogance is a result of no self confidence.. And self­ confidence is not something that Roger lacks, and that­ of course has its reasons.. 15 GRAND SLAM TITLES!!!!!

    From rubendelange, on Mon 6 Jul 11:02AM
  16. Congratulations to Federer. He is the best. He deserved­ to win. Once more he showed how great player he is.­ Roddick was also good. Better luck next time.

    From Jovan, on Mon 6 Jul 10:43AM
  17. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    About Federer being a true sportsman....he's such a­ snob....Has anyone ever noticed that he doesnt sign­ autograghs even after the tremendous support he gets­ from his fans....he simply waves. he once said that he­ doesnt sign autographs because he knows one day­ he'll be so great and years later, people will sell­ his autograph and make lots of money from it...whom­ does he think he is......

    From Immac Reno, on Mon 6 Jul 10:14AM
  18. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    I agree with comment 423-raed i, Federer, the greatest­ of all time is a no no...comparing the conditions,­ rules and changes in the game for the last 60­ yrs.....Rod Laver should take that credit....
    Federer­ was lucky Nadal has not played Roland garros or­ wimbledon otherwise he would not even have gotten to­ 14th. Nadal is the only man who has ever beaten federer­ in a grandslam and Fed well knows that.......
    Nadal is­ gonna come back even stronger, i heard that he's­ missing the Davis cup quarter finals but he's­ trying hamburg and he'll definately play at­ Montreal to defend the Roger's cup title he won­ last year. We miss u Rafa, Tennis is not the same­ without u. Gell well soon. LoveXXXX

    From Immac Reno, on Mon 6 Jul 10:11AM
  19. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    Everyone knows deep in his heart that claiming federer­ is the best ever is just a CLAIM when you are NOT THE­ BEST IN YOUR ERA it is laughable to claim that you are­ the best ever. Federer is so lucky that he came in the­ weakest era of tennis but when a decent player emerged­ he lost time and again to him and he lost­ comprehensively when he wanted most to win (5 out of 7­ GS finals ) when your head to head record with your­ direct rival is 7-13 that means one thing and one thing­ only that is your rival is superior than you.­ period.

    From raed i, on Mon 6 Jul 9:57AM
  20. andy roddick has survived for years only with his­ service,being humilliated every time he met a decent­ player.i agree that in the last months he improved a­ lot his tennis,but that doesn't mean he deserved to­ win.roger had more than 100 winners,while roddick had­ onnly 70 .that is what makes the difference between the­ two of them.of course we can always find excuses and­ reasons to hate someone.but it is not an accident that­ roger is world number one and that he has beaten andy­ 19 times in a row.so,maybe it was luck that made roger­ win OR MAYBE ROGER IS SIMPLY BETTER.SO PLEASE STOP­ FINDING REASONS TO TAKE ROGER'S CREDIT FOR TAKING­ HIS WIMBLEDON CROWN BACK. goodluck roger .u are SIMPLY­ THE BEST,BETTER THAN ALL THE REST,BETTER THAN ANYONE­ I'VE EVER MET!!!!!!!!!

    From iulias, on Mon 6 Jul 9:41AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account