Eurosport - Mon, 06 Jul 08:00:00 2009
Roger Federer won a record 15th Grand Slam after beating sixth seed Andy Roddick in an epic fifth set 5-7 7-6 7-6 3-6 16-14 in the Wimbledon men's final.
Federer's victory was all the more incredible for the fact that he recovered from one set down, and trailed 6-2 in a second set tie-break before he won the next two sets to seize control of a scintillating encounter on Centre Court.
Roddick refused to be denied, and the American fought back against the world number two with ferocious intensity, and clinched the fourth set 6-3 with real conviction.
The fifth set was a positive barrage of aces from the rackets of both players but finally, serving to stay in the match for the 11th time, Roddick was broken as Federer sealed a monumental win.
At 27 years old, Federer has now overhauled Pete Sampras's incredible tally of 14 titles, among which he can count six Wimbledon crowns to surpass Bjorn Borg and Lawrence Doherty's five.
For Roddick, it was a third defeat to the Swiss in finals at the All England Club to follow similar results in 2004 and 2005, and to compound the American's frustration, his nemesis now holds a staggering 19-2 career advantage over him.
The artistry of the Swiss generally trumped the 26-year-old's punch and grit and, in playing in his seventh straight Wimbledon final and record 20th Grand Slam title match, the world number two looked utterly composed.
Both players settled incredibly quickly, finding a good rhythm on serve and looking comfortable in the process, as the first 10 games were rattled through with consummate ease.
Indeed, Roddick did not commit an unforced error until the set was locked at 5-5, despite Federer having sauntered through his service holds in a more serene fashion.
The American was forced to save three break points in his sixth service game, and even had to challenge a line call to save the second, but held his nerve impressively.
Perhaps a touch of complacency set in to Federer's game, as he drilled two erratic forehands wide and long to hand Roddick the crucial break which clinched the first set for the American 7-5, to the crowd's disbelief.
With the second set mimicking the first on the most part, the only game which was not taken with assurance on serve was at 5-5, with Federer double faulting for 30-30, but again he came through unscathed.
Roddick began the second set tie-break with a 143mph ace and, having won 26 out of 31 breakers this season, the American looked invincible as he raced into a 6-2 lead.
The turning point was perhaps an inexplicably mishit backhand volley from the sixth seed, and his four set points slowly and painfully eroded before him as Federer stormed back to clinch the second set with his first opportunity at 8-6.
While Federer proceeded to cruise through his service games at the start of the third set, Roddick was forced to battle valiantly to save a break point at 30-40 in the sixth game, as the Swiss turned the screw.
Roddick showed real resilience in forcing a second tie-break, and this time the roles were reversed as Federer raced into a 5-1 lead, pouncing on two tepid second serves from the American.
The sixth seed clawed his way back into the breaker, and demanded of his opponent that he hold his nerve at 6-5 to serve out for the third set: Federer duly did just that.
Roddick was undeterred by having slipped behind in the match, and broke the Swiss in the fourth game of the fourth set, slamming a backhand down the line to re-exert his authority.
Federer smelt an opportunity after the American had double faulted at 30-30 with a 4-2 lead, but the sixth seed won an epic 21-shot rally with a powerful forehand, and followed it with a booming ace to consolidate his break.
Federer surged into a 0-30 lead with Roddick erring slightly as he served for the fourth set, but the American harried superbly to win an extended rally, and delivered another stunning first serve out wide to take the match into a fifth and final set.
In just the second game of the final set, Roddick continued his unblemished record of saving break points in the match, and rescued a sixth with an emphatic first serve out wide after Federer had won an 18-shot rally with a deft forehand.
Both players refused to compromise on their serves, crunching big deliveries seemingly at will, as Federer unthinkably out-aced his opponent with a count of 50 as the final set coasted along through 6-6 and beyond.
With the set locked at 8-8, Roddick found an exquisite backhand passing shot down the line to prompt two set points, but somehow Federer wrestled his way out of trouble in the manner of an escapologist, holding after deuce.
As both players grew wearier, their impeccable standards finally began to wilt, and two overhit backhands from Roddick handed victory to Federer, his record-breaking victor in the most dramatic manner.
The match was the longest ever men's grand slam final in games, clocking up a total of 77 across five sets, and at 16-14 the fifth set was also a record.
Prior to the final Federer stood, in many people's eyes, on the cusp of ending the perennial debate over whether he is the game's greatest ever player. His record now stands alone.
Comment 412 - 431 of 431
There is no doubt Roddick played a great match, his variety of serve was amazing. However winning titles depends on stamina, concentration and the ability to play the important points well. His inability to take the set points he had created his problem, and Federer simply kept up with him and had the advantage of serving first in the final set. But when you look at the statistics Federer hit many more winners than Roddick, and in the end outlasted him, when Roddick's serving percentage dips he will always be vulnerable even though his overall game has improved immensely. Good on him for reaching the final and providing a riveting match.
ALL TENNIS MATCHES ON INTERNET: AUSTRALIAN OPEN, WIMBLEDON, ROLAND GARROS, US OPEN, , DAVIS CUP , FED CUP, ATP INTERNATIONAL SERIES, MASTERS SERIES, ATP CHALLENGER SERIES, ATP FUTURES SERIES AND MUCH MORE
I cant understand why people dont appriciate Federer. This guy is sooo good he can do everything on court and at the same time he's quite modest and not as arrogant as many other players that dont even come close to Swiss legend. There is no doubt that for today he is the best tennis player of all time and though I respect Rafa Nadal and really think that he is really special tallant and special player I cant compare himto Roger. Federers tennis is perfect and thats why he is injury free while Nadal will have permanent troubles with his physical condition because his game involves inormous physical strength. So Federer is perfect he is the legend and I advice everyone to love him or at least respect;)
andy roddick was the better player federa only broke his serve once as for andy murray someone called him a cry baby bet that person is english andy murray his great and one day he will be the greatest
Nadal - Federer 13-7 and Nadal is 5 years younger too, stop jumping on the bandwagon, nadal is already proving better and has 5 years to win 9 slam titles to match federer's feat yesterday, which he could definately beat if fit enough.
Action,emotion,passion and a great match!!!!
hey people! wake up!....the match was between FEDERER and RODDICK!!! WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT NADAL?....and by the way if NADAL would have played with roddick hE would have lost!coz' andy played great. so shut up and be fayr play once for all....BECAUSE IF YO WANNA TALK ABOUT NADAL I LL TELL YOU SOMETHING: IF FEDERER WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SICK NADAL WOULDN'T HAVE WON A THING!!! THE KING IS BACK! YOU LIKE IT OR YOU DON'T!
hey people! wake up!....the match was between FEDERER and RODDICK!!! WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT NADAL?....and by the way if NADAL would have played with roddick hE would have lost!coz' andy played great. so shut up and be fayr play once for all....BECAUSE IF YO WANNA TALK ABOUT NADAL I LL TELL YOU SOMETHING: IF FEDERER WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SICK NADAL WOULDN'T HAVE WON A THING!!! THE KING IS BACK! YOU LIKE IT OR YOU DON'T!
To GOD be the Glory.
re: 425 msg... what on earth you talking about, did andy murray sign any autographs when he got starched by roddick? no instead he swore and acted like a big baby
nothing against nadal or any of the other greats but how dare you all put roger ferderer down if the world of tennis thinks hes the best of our time then who are all you no all f**k alls talking about get a life n would love 2 see any of you out there .
Although Federer won I think Andy played the better tennis and deserved win more than that gold wearing p00f, only reason he wins is because everyone gets nervous playing him but if they thought differently he would get tanned every year.
roger is not that much of a snob as why would he be on facebook
how manty titles has nadal won and how many fed period you muppets
First things first, what an amazing achievement by Roger Federer, Congrats!!! Second, All I want to say about his personality to all those mispercieving people in this forum and on this entire website is that they should not CONFUSE arrogance with self confidence. Arrogance is a result of no self confidence.. And self confidence is not something that Roger lacks, and that of course has its reasons.. 15 GRAND SLAM TITLES!!!!!
Congratulations to Federer. He is the best. He deserved to win. Once more he showed how great player he is. Roddick was also good. Better luck next time.
About Federer being a true sportsman....he's such a snob....Has anyone ever noticed that he doesnt sign autograghs even after the tremendous support he gets from his fans....he simply waves. he once said that he doesnt sign autographs because he knows one day he'll be so great and years later, people will sell his autograph and make lots of money from it...whom does he think he is......
I agree with comment 423-raed i, Federer, the greatest of all time is a no no...comparing the conditions, rules and changes in the game for the last 60 yrs.....Rod Laver should take that credit....
Federer was lucky Nadal has not played Roland garros or wimbledon otherwise he would not even have gotten to 14th. Nadal is the only man who has ever beaten federer in a grandslam and Fed well knows that.......
Nadal is gonna come back even stronger, i heard that he's missing the Davis cup quarter finals but he's trying hamburg and he'll definately play at Montreal to defend the Roger's cup title he won last year. We miss u Rafa, Tennis is not the same without u. Gell well soon. LoveXXXX
Everyone knows deep in his heart that claiming federer is the best ever is just a CLAIM when you are NOT THE BEST IN YOUR ERA it is laughable to claim that you are the best ever. Federer is so lucky that he came in the weakest era of tennis but when a decent player emerged he lost time and again to him and he lost comprehensively when he wanted most to win (5 out of 7 GS finals ) when your head to head record with your direct rival is 7-13 that means one thing and one thing only that is your rival is superior than you. period.
andy roddick has survived for years only with his service,being humilliated every time he met a decent player.i agree that in the last months he improved a lot his tennis,but that doesn't mean he deserved to win.roger had more than 100 winners,while roddick had onnly 70 .that is what makes the difference between the two of them.of course we can always find excuses and reasons to hate someone.but it is not an accident that roger is world number one and that he has beaten andy 19 times in a row.so,maybe it was luck that made roger win OR MAYBE ROGER IS SIMPLY BETTER.SO PLEASE STOP FINDING REASONS TO TAKE ROGER'S CREDIT FOR TAKING HIS WIMBLEDON CROWN BACK. goodluck roger .u are SIMPLY THE BEST,BETTER THAN ALL THE REST,BETTER THAN ANYONE I'VE EVER MET!!!!!!!!!
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account