Eurosport - Thu, 07 May 13:58:00 2009
The Champions League semi-final between Chelsea and Barcelona was like witnessing a fight between a flamenco dancer and a chav.
For the majority of the match at Stamford Bridge the action could have been played out in a West London wine bar.
You stand there watching as a beautiful, curvaceous senorita whirls before you, beckoning all the while. You feel small leaps of joy inside your chest.
Yet the large, muscley, chavy girl from your hometown you are ashamed to have taken up with is blocking her path.
You suddenly have a thirst which the margarita in your hand could never quench; as time goes on you start to worry that in fact the big-boned Londoner will prevent any contact between you and the chica.
There is a future date on May 27, in Rome, where an English girlfriend of yours will be present; she and the chav met a year ago in Moscow, and while the outcome of their fight was entertaining, it was not a pretty outcome.
You don't want to go through that again.
And - to dispense with this now-tedious analogy - you find yourself grateful to mistress fate when the chav panics, allowing the senorita to finally break through and provide the match with a finish it deserved.
The lack of penetration was not, for the most part, the fault of Barcelona. Chelsea, commendably solid at the Camp Nou, took their refusal to string more than two consecutive passes together to new heights at home.
Perhaps credit is due: they were a kick away from the final, after all, and denied at least one clear penalty after monopolising the goalmouth incident market.
Either way, it highlights Barca's weaknesses ahead of the final against Manchester United: at the root of these is the realisation that the teams who sit so deep in La Liga, whom Barca nearly always break down eventually, are simply not as good at it as the English clubs.
United will not be as solid defensively as Chelsea were on Wednesday night, but they are strong enough while offering a good deal more going forward - and this against a defence which encountered all sorts of problems with simple, direct tactics and the occasional diagonal ball for Florent Malouda.
Club captain Carles Puyol will be back to fill in at centre-half for Yaya Toure, often out of position against Chelsea and greatly missed in midfield, while Sylvinho will replace the sent-off Eric Abidal like-for-like at left-back.
That leaves the right-back spot to be filled, with Seydou Keita the more likely to deputise for Dani Alves, harshly booked for jumping to head the ball - although Xavi or Andres Iniesta, being the most technically gifted, would do the best job, Pep Guardiola will surely not want to leave his midfield-attack bereft of its two most important components.
Chelsea's goal gave the match a fabulous beginning, Michael Essien's left-footed, both-feet-off-the-ground volley the equal of Zinedine Zidane's strike in the 2002 final at Hampden Park.
However if there was any hope of Chelsea stepping out to attack in numbers, even on the counter, it was effectively killed at a stroke.
We should be grateful for the atrocious defensive positional play of Barca - and the endeavour of Didier Drogba, Nicolas Anelka and Malouda - as it gave us an end-to-end encounter where there should have been none.
Whenever Lionel Messi, Iniesta or the disappointing Samuel Eto'o came forward on to the ball, you could count eight men in front of them in two lines five yards apart: the polar opposite of the disjointed away back four.
It was interesting because you couldn't see Chelsea doing that against Man Utd, who also employ two wide attackers and a man down the middle; for Iniesta read Wayne Rooney, for Messi, Ronaldo.
There is great fear of Barca's attacking abilities but United will not sit that deep in a European final; while Chelsea's success from the Jose Mourinho era onwards has been built on percentages.
Alex Ferguson's side pride themselves on their pedigree on the continent and with Ronaldo in the team, they will also look to attack, when it suits.
There will be no Darren Fletcher to deny space in the middle of the park, leaving perhaps Anderson to sit deep alongside Michael Carrick. John O'Shea could do a job, but will Ferguson want to pit him against the Catalan club's midfield?
Chelsea threatened Barca from set-pieces, such as Drogba's narrow-angle free-kick and John Terry's header almost deflected home by Alex, while Frank Lampard caused problems when freed from his defensive shackles and Drogba should have scored in the second half.
That is in stark contrast to Barca - usually so devastating - for whom Xavi disappointed on those rare opportunities to get the ball into the danger area while Alves's final ball was appalling and Iniesta looked for the pass when the goal opened up for a shot.
So back to the senorita: by the time she comes face to face with that attractive, experienced girl from Manchester - herself the vanquisher of a fleet-footed vixen in the semis - it will almost certainly be a case of the queen of one country versus that of another, a battle between the two most respected leagues in the world.
It will be a fitting face-off for the greatest club fixture on the planet, for once a match truly reflecting the Champions League.
Let's hope the match lives up to the billing: for all the tension at the Bridge, the game resembled an attack-versus-defence training session, albeit one with exciting cameos of penalties appealed for and denied.
Comment 107 - 126 of 146
I discovered a hot place 、
------Wealth y F inder C o M------ where many sexy singles- who like dating and-- chatting there. I'm an open- minded girl from US, I-- am Waiting 4 u
you chelsea and english fagsssss, get the facts straight. If chelsea was such a better team, and palyed better than barca, why didn't they scored more goals? Barca was missing Henry, they were missing 3 of their best defenders, Puyol, Milito, and Marques, and still chelse could not score more than one goal, and that goal was lucky from eissen. Plus the fact that Barca was a man down and they still managed to score. Also, did you forget the match at Camp Nou, when ballack got away with the red card, and a penalty was not given to Henry, and Barca had 23 shots to 3 shots for chelsea, and when Barca fans were complaining, you chelsea fans were laughing. Guess what? It's pay back. Face it, Barca deserved to win, they played better in both legs, they had more possesion and more shots and played real football, and not antifootball like chelsea did.
Everybody only complaints:Penal should be here, penal should be there. But nobody complaints when Anelka and Drogba were one on one with Valdes and they blew it big time. So if you cant score in sytuation one on one DONT LOOK FOR PENAL!!!!!!!
kjvskvbdv ddv dv dv divndsv df v vdiv ońvn-ńthbebe n n e nrd dn hbbńoljc nbpudchoasdiubc
Will barca fans turn up in rome, cuz they have never turned up in any other final
17,500 tickets for two of the best supported teams in the world in a stadium that holds 70,000, no doubt the other 35,000 will go to the ponces, parasites and other assorted scumbags of eufa, get your head from up your arse platini.
looking forward to a man u barca final so we can win it proper this year rather than trying to get the ball past ten defenders
barca should watch it, man u has recovered from the defence lapses. viva man u for life
man utd will probably waste the game by defending all game like they did against barca last year.
the football purists all want barca to win.
no offence but man u defence are no better than chelsea.. chelsea defence is rock solid still Barca slipped thru.. epl stat can proved that..!
whoever wrote this should walk to the closest mirror and spit on himself, cant believe why they allow cows to post things on yahoo...
Good article. Barca are similar to Arsenal, they want to walk their way into the goal by passing their opponents to death. Chelsea have proved they can be stopped with a solid back line and some good holding midfield play. I can't see Barca breaking down Utd especially if Rio and Vidic are fit. Should be a fantastic match and I for one agree that these are the 2 teams worthy of a Champions League final.
Peter Cech almost fall asleep not forced to make any saves, then he caught dreaming with the sole shot on target.. flash Iniesta magic in dying minutes n he shot the ball straight to Rome..!!
Even the english hate the english team in the final!this lad is supporting barcelona.
what a @#$% artice, you know nothing about football, if chelsea was in the spanish leage they would easily get more goals than Barcelona do, and i dont even like chelsea....
VCFH1945 - what a @#$%! Just becasue you couldn't get the ref to give your ROSE PETAL GLASSES WEARING LIVERPOOL team another dodgy goal against Chelsea like you did a few years ago. You have some cheek saying Fergie buys refs. Benitez must have bought the refs in the Prem Leagus then with all the decisions you have gotten this year. When you cheated against Milan it must have been a "hollow final". Did you see the way Utd have been knocked out of the last 2 FAcup competitions by a refs decision? Did you see the ref disallowing Utd's goal in CL against Porto when they won it or Real Madrid defender saving a goal with his hand against Utd in 2000 when they won it.Ii feel sorry for Chelsea fans but I'm Not sorry for seeing the back of the Swim Dive team of Gerrard and Torres.
man u get ready for the assult you are next at rome and i hope u really live up to expectetions good football is what we need and ever pray for .mr alex 13 years ago you know what u did to barca so get ready for revenge barca for life and blood azugrana.
fergs is pissin himself at barca,s shots on goal!!
Nice one Griff. At least someone on here has a sense of humour and can take a bit of fun.
Apologies Pegez. You are of course quite correct old chap. Must have my dictionary to hand the next time I contribute to a blog! Very important to get these things absolutely right. Hope I have not offended you with any more spelling mistakes you prat.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account