Eurosport - Tue, 07 Jul 13:50:00 2009
Roger Federer will set about extending his collection of Grand Slam titles way beyond the record breaking 15th he won at Wimbledon, after declaring that the 'old Federer' was back.
Those words should have all his rivals quivering in their shoes.
"(Eighteen or 19 slam wins) definitely seems possible. I've reached 16 out of 17 Grand Slam finals in a row now, so I definitely have a shot for the next few years," the 27-year-old, who beat Andy Roddick in five titanic sets in the Wimbledon final, said.
In case anyone has forgotten, the old Federer was ranked on top of the tennis world for a record 237 weeks, collected around a dozen titles a year and relished the opportunity to pulverise his opponents.
By his own high standards Federer went through a lean patch in 2008, when he suffered a bout of glandular fever at the start of the season and then reached three Grand Slam finals but only lifted the US Open.
He lost his number one ranking to Rafael Nadal last August but recaptured that crown with his Wimbledon triumph.
On Sunday Federer was hailed as "an icon and a legend" by Pete Sampras - the man whose milestone of 14 slams he obliterated from the record books - and the Swiss said on Monday he was eager to add more weight to his already creaking trophy cabinet.
"I'm still young in tennis terms, I think. It's only after 30 the clock starts ticking, you know, how many more years you've got left in your mind... because normally it's also the body that gives," Federer said.
"Pete always said one Major a year is a good year. I really feel I have chances in all four Majors to wins. That's what maybe gives me a bigger chance to win some."
Federer has rediscovered his sublime touch and precise footwork.
Four Sundays ago he became only the sixth man to complete a career Grand Slam of all four Majors when he finally got his hands on the French Open trophy.
On that day, Federer announced he could play the rest of his career without pressure. He has been true to his word and a relaxed Federer is an unwelcome sight for any of his rivals.
The secret of his success?
"I have no more back pain," laughed the genial Swiss, who also reclaimed the top ranking with his Wimbledon triumph.
"I'm not scared anymore of going into the very corner of the court and digging out the ball, which I was scared of doing at times. That's why my serve sometimes faltered, like in important moments, because I did not have enough belief that my body was holding up.
"Now I feel so much better, I can play the way I normally play. Use offence, use defence, my serve's clicking. I know in the important moments I will take the right decisions.
"Now I feel like the old guy again."
That 'old guy' was trying to come to terms with just how quickly he had surpassed Sampras's benchmark.
It took the American 12 years to fill his trophy cabinet, Federer scooped up number 15 in just six.
When Sampras broke Australian Roy Emerson's previous record of 12 at Wimbledon in 2000, and then extended it at the 2002 US Open, most people thought that landmark would last a lifetime and Federer was almost apologetic for surpassing it so quickly.
"Being on the same level in Majors as Pete, that was kind of important for me and not really breaking his record. I almost feel a little bit bad if I'm quite honest," said Federer, who looked extremely fresh despite getting only two hours sleep.
"It's like disbelief almost that I've got more slams then Pete, who's my hero."
Comment 188 - 207 of 207
what if this is just a trick pulled off by ATP trying to add a little excitement to this sport. I doubt Federer and Nadal were having or have had injuries or medical problems.
And now a little bit about doping, I don't thing Federer's and Nadal's doping tests will ever be positive, regardless of what "performance enhancers" they might be using and let's admit that it takes a little bit more than a genius personality to sustain their amazing performances... If each one of them is tested positive then it's the end of this sport, it will be the worst imaginable nightmare in the history of tennis.
this ruan Z guy, can you do anything but insult d people you debate? that's so juvenile, learn to be an adult a little. You sound like djokovic a litle when he sounds so spikey, just try your best to get attention without insulting, people will still read your opinions. remeber the guy you love so much is the guy journalist claim to be so graceful, try to be graceful a little. good luck man!
i still believe rafa will come back better than ever i believe coz i know he can
I am FEDERER all the way...but u must give credit to Nadal and Djocov and the andys and co. The mens game get tougher with time and those guys are trying so hard.
Nadal is a fantastic player with a diff dimention to the game...he just has a set back and i know he'll be back.Federer deserves all that he gets and even more for his consistency and the out look he gives to the game . I wish his Gods blessings,good health and greater success.
General.
AFTER HE RECLAIMED THE TOP SPOT, THERE CAME BACK HIS NEMESIS NADAL.............................
I am a great Nadal fan, but I am starting to realize that whenever he is talked about the phrase "fully fit" before his name is starting to sound like it's his christian name. We don't say "Rafa Nadal can beat Federer" but "a fully fit Nadal can beat Federer". This sort of makes all these discussions pointless. I think we can make no predictions but just wait and see what happens, one tournament at a time, and hope that he can get rid of the knee problem once and for all.
Very well put no 200. Overall Federer is the better player. His 15 slams prove that. Only if Nadal beats that can he be called greater. My point is that now at this moment in time if Nadal is fully fit he is better than federer. Federer cannot go on and on always being better than others. His best years I believe are behind him and a fully fit Nadal is now the best player in the world. When Nadals superority was only on clay he couldn't be considfered better. But in the last year he's beaten Federer on grass and hard court. That I believe proves my point.
Nadal is a great player and I do like him for his humility and what seems to be a genuine kindness. The main problem he will face in later years will be physical, he has a type of tennis that can not be sustained for long period of times. He has a very unusual physique for a tennis player (you look at Federer and you can clearly see the difference). However, the way he plays puts an enormous strain on his body, particularly his knees and it has been a long time in coming but I think that the troubles will keep coming back.
Someone mentioned that a fully fit Nadal would have beaten Federer and I agree with that. He is, on his day, essentially unbeatable. However the question is more along the lines: will Nadal ever be fully fit again? It would truly be a shame as he is a fantastic addition to the sport but I can not see, given the way he plays tennis, how he will ever be able to sustain an entire season without injury...
The whole debate about who is the greatest is honestly pointless, the only thing I would say (given that I have been playing tennis since I was six years old) is that Nadal impresses me for his ability to fight a lost cause time and time again and his extraordinary physical shots and the way he manages to produce power from seemingly impossible positions. Federer, however, impresses because he makes supremely complex shots look like a walk in the park.
I admire one because he really is an athlete, I admire the other because he has mastered the technical aspect of the game to a degree that I had never seen before.
Sorry, it is a long post and I am neither pro or anti either of these players. I just think that trying to compare them is ultimately pointless.
All you Nadal fans, this article is about Federer and yes I think he is the greatest. In comparison Nadal is no where near as decorated. One good year does not make someone greatest. Being the greatest is about persistence and persiverence showing up the grandslam semis and finals and winning them even when you are having a rough day. I am sorry but until Nadal can rake up as many grandslam semis and finals and surpass Roger's record, he will just be Rafeal Nadal, perhaps the greatest claycourt player. Welldone Roger, truly deserve your number 1 status and the accolades to go with it.
Time will prove which one of us is right. And Nadal would have won W if he had got to the final, and was playing as well as he did last year. I'm afraid you lack serious comments to continue this discussion, as I say time will prove who s correct
wow ruan speaks of himself just like federer, clearly a fan
stuartlawrence27, im tired of hearing about a fully fit nadal. who is to blame for his physical state but himself? ive predicted this for years, its been a looong time coming. im sorry to burst your bubble but Roger is in better shape at his age then nadal and if you lose just one match in 4 slams you are the best. period. and im sooo tired of hearing nadals excuses. the fact his he plays a taxing game while Roger does not, just one of the reasons why Roger is better. Roger is much better then nadal right now, there is nothing to argue about. its irrelevant if he is fit or not, because he is not. and even if he was fit Roger would still kick his @#$%.i was sooo hoping nadal would make the wimby final again but the 'warrior' didnt even show up. you really need to get out of denial and face reailty. its the start of a new era and Roger will be number one as long as he wants to be, which means a looong time. nadal isnt far from burning out now. he could soon slip further down the rankings, in which case he will find it very hard to recover. you cant deny my infinite tennis knowledge and i think i am done arguing with you. you obviously lack the expertise to debate me.
Ruans Federer Blog
Jimmy i totally agree with you.
Ruan if you can't see that Fed played better 2 or 3 years ago than he plays now I find it incredible. Yes he's won 3 of the last 4 slams but that doesn't mean he's as good as he was. It shows how good he was in my opinion. Only looking at Fed blindly can anyone not see that he's finding it hard to accept others can beat him now. Afully fit Rfa is rightfully world no 1 now, that is obvious, and no one was more pleased than me when Fed broke the record on Sunday by the way. But I'm honest. At nearly 28 you don't expect to be as good as you are at 25. The only person who ruined Feds year in 2008 was Rafa no one else. If his problems were as bad as you say he would never have made the finals of rg and W or won the us open. Talk sense and don't be like some Nadal fans who can't see the truth beyond their idol. You will soon see that Fed will make more excuses as he loses more from now on. Unfortunately people like you still won't accept the truth
Once Roger said, when he was asked about his attitude, that when he saw one of his matches against Safin, where both guys were yelling and braking rackets he felt embarrased and he decided not to do it anymore. Maybe someone told him not to, maybe his couch suggested him to change his attitude or maybe he realized his attitude wasn't going to take him far and he decided to change, it's harder to change though and you should give him credit for that. But it's wrong to think that someone can just create talents out of normal people. It all depends on the player, what they want, how far one wants to go, and if you set big goals you have to change things that don't suit your goals, that's called determination. And what's wrong with being spaniard? As far as i know Spain is one of the most lovely countries, with the most friendly people.
Once Roger said, when he was asked about his attitude, that when he saw one of his matches against Safin, where both guys were yelling and braking rackets he felt embarrased and he decided not to do it anymore. Maybe someone told him not to, maybe his couch suggested him to change his attitude or maybe he realized his attitude wasn't going to take him far and he decided to change, it's harder to change though and you should give him credit for that. But it's wrong to think that someone can just create talents out of normal people. It all depends on the player, what they want, how far one wants to go, and if you set big goals you have to change things that don't suit your goals, that's called determination. And what's wrong with being spaniard? As far as i know Spain is one of the most lovely countries, with the most friendly people.
Sorry I meant prize money.
I think there is absolutely no way that matches can be fixed at this high level, because what's involved is not only price money and points and rankings, but sponsors and advertising, and that's where the real money is coming from. Rafa would have to be out of his mind in order to accept to jeopardize his business with KIA or Roger with Rolex and Gillette and what not? How much money would that be worth? Maybe matches on a lower level can be fixed by bookies, but not with the top players in the Grand Slams and the Masters Series.
when roger came he acted totally different, jelling, arguing, breaking, dont you think someone told him not to do that, they could leave him that way, and he could be one more one slam wonder. look at murray, he changed his attitude. rafa didnt have to change anything, maybe THEY dont like it. maybe there is time for rafa to make money for them, and maybe he is just spaniard
I don't see why they should find great players from not so great countries as you say rabbit. The talent goes where it goes. The small or the poorer countries have less opportunities to make a good living in something else out of the sports, and than no matter where you come from, the dream of almost every kid is to become a great athlete. I really don't see your point here, and even though Swiss is a small country, it's one of the most important countries in Europe, just for the fact of the banks let's say.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account