Eurosport - Tue, 07 Jul 13:50:00 2009
Roger Federer will set about extending his collection of Grand Slam titles way beyond the record breaking 15th he won at Wimbledon, after declaring that the 'old Federer' was back.
Those words should have all his rivals quivering in their shoes.
"(Eighteen or 19 slam wins) definitely seems possible. I've reached 16 out of 17 Grand Slam finals in a row now, so I definitely have a shot for the next few years," the 27-year-old, who beat Andy Roddick in five titanic sets in the Wimbledon final, said.
In case anyone has forgotten, the old Federer was ranked on top of the tennis world for a record 237 weeks, collected around a dozen titles a year and relished the opportunity to pulverise his opponents.
By his own high standards Federer went through a lean patch in 2008, when he suffered a bout of glandular fever at the start of the season and then reached three Grand Slam finals but only lifted the US Open.
He lost his number one ranking to Rafael Nadal last August but recaptured that crown with his Wimbledon triumph.
On Sunday Federer was hailed as "an icon and a legend" by Pete Sampras - the man whose milestone of 14 slams he obliterated from the record books - and the Swiss said on Monday he was eager to add more weight to his already creaking trophy cabinet.
"I'm still young in tennis terms, I think. It's only after 30 the clock starts ticking, you know, how many more years you've got left in your mind... because normally it's also the body that gives," Federer said.
"Pete always said one Major a year is a good year. I really feel I have chances in all four Majors to wins. That's what maybe gives me a bigger chance to win some."
Federer has rediscovered his sublime touch and precise footwork.
Four Sundays ago he became only the sixth man to complete a career Grand Slam of all four Majors when he finally got his hands on the French Open trophy.
On that day, Federer announced he could play the rest of his career without pressure. He has been true to his word and a relaxed Federer is an unwelcome sight for any of his rivals.
The secret of his success?
"I have no more back pain," laughed the genial Swiss, who also reclaimed the top ranking with his Wimbledon triumph.
"I'm not scared anymore of going into the very corner of the court and digging out the ball, which I was scared of doing at times. That's why my serve sometimes faltered, like in important moments, because I did not have enough belief that my body was holding up.
"Now I feel so much better, I can play the way I normally play. Use offence, use defence, my serve's clicking. I know in the important moments I will take the right decisions.
"Now I feel like the old guy again."
That 'old guy' was trying to come to terms with just how quickly he had surpassed Sampras's benchmark.
It took the American 12 years to fill his trophy cabinet, Federer scooped up number 15 in just six.
When Sampras broke Australian Roy Emerson's previous record of 12 at Wimbledon in 2000, and then extended it at the 2002 US Open, most people thought that landmark would last a lifetime and Federer was almost apologetic for surpassing it so quickly.
"Being on the same level in Majors as Pete, that was kind of important for me and not really breaking his record. I almost feel a little bit bad if I'm quite honest," said Federer, who looked extremely fresh despite getting only two hours sleep.
"It's like disbelief almost that I've got more slams then Pete, who's my hero."
Comment 148 - 167 of 207
Roger is the greatest ever to play tennis and we all know it good luck in everything you do Roger.Hope baby is healthy when it comes you will be a great dad and husband.
Ruan Z, of course I admint it. He deserves it all. I just wish I made one hundredth of the money he has made (never mind the glory) considering all the hard work and dedication I put into my line of work.
Hanna43 thanks. And I must say I don't understand why they hide the comments with the low ratings. What is the reasoning behind it? Lots of people don't agree with what you said, so we'll hide it? As if it's porno or something.
unzwa - I think you are one of those who actually think it is Nadal who banged Federer's wife in order to beat him everywhere, right?
Jimmy 157: you are forever the gentleman and a really nice person! Thanks for this comment and peace! Hanna43
Alaye 124: Well said. No doubt many will brand you as a "Federer hater" (eurosport is hiding my comment #113 for low rating!!!!!) but I think your comment is realistic and fair and I agree with you! Hanna43
Hey, the bitter has been bitten before. Let's not forget that Roger claimed Wimbledon title because Rafa was not there. If the lion recovers all the hypes about Federer will be easily contained, and will even spell dooom for Federer himself. Sometimes last year during the comprehensive beatings by Rafa, it looked as if the doom had already come for Roger.
siskra83 - I think that emotions deserve to be revealed. If Federer wanted to cry because of a heavy defeat let him do so. After all, as far as I remember he did not yell like a small baby he only cried like an any young man does sometimes when something goes wrong. I do not know if this can be taken as disrepectful to the winner. The only thing I know that it is propably emotionally exhausting moment to be there in front of the whole world and win it or loose it. I wouldn't discredit Federer because of it and call him not humble enough. On the opposite - I would say he was so humble of his vanquisher that he must have cried to show his instantaneous weakness. He gave his "enemy" the best reward he could - he cried in tears respectful of his power which had just overcome him.
Jimmy, fair enough. But you must admit he deserves at least some of that money or glory. It takes a lot of hard work and dedication to achieve what he did. Oh yeah and i cant stand Murray either. Lol!
@risimko...you are wright about the tears of joy, I like to see them on the face of the winner. I was talking about the tears after a lost match. I will try to explain why. Every real sportsman coming in the court knows (no matter how confident he is) that he can win, but also that there is a possibility to loose. You cant think about yourself only willing to be in a center of attention. Crying because you lost the match shows, in my humble opinion disrespect to the winner ( I have the same opinion for Safina at RG 2009, although she didn't cry). We have different opinion about humbleness, too. I respect your opinion, but I have a different one. The only thing that I don't respect is an attitude " All who don't share my opinion is stupid, useless hater, moron...."
Ruan Z, of course it's not important that I don't like Roger. And it's not important that you like him either, since he doesn't know either of us exists. What's important is that he pockets the money and he basks in glory while we pass the time of day arguing who is best and finding this way to have fun when there is no tennis to watch. But I think I am allowed to have favorites and so are you. And to set the record straight I like just about everybody except Murray and Roger, in that order. I don't think it's really worth having a fight about it. Of course, it's fun, though. So, peace!
siskra83 - the tears of joy are part of life. If you think a man cannot burst in tears after winning or loosing a grandslam then you are truly a stone cold pathetic, sorry to say that. Emotions belong to a man just like his skin. This would be the last thing I would blame Federer for. As far as his off court behaviour goes I think only those who know him personally could answer this call. I don't know him and I assume you don't know him that way too. I also do not know what kind of humblesseness you would expect from a man who got 15 GS titles and has been among last 4 at GS events like 20 times in row. Do you have the feeling he hasn't got a right to give some advice? I think this myth of Federer being arrogant is an invention of those who cannot deal with the fact that we are facing a historical phenomenon.
Oh yeah and Jimmy about your other comment, its not important that you dont like Roger. The fact that he has the most fans in the history of the sport and wins the sportsmanship award just about every year is what matters. Stop being such a useless hater.
Jimmy, if im right it wont be the first time and it wont be the last time. Dont discount the possibility that he may retire soon.
Ateeq, im afraid you have completely lost it old sport.
Federer is the greatest of them all! No amount of "ifs" and "buts" by Nadal fans r going to change that!
Thank you jimmy, I also like very much your sophisticated style of expression and I mean it REALLY
Siskra83 well-said. I also enjoyed your comment about Federer wearing a crown instead of a bandana in another site. That's exactly what's wrong with him and why I might admire him as a player but I'll never like him as a person. I would only root for him if he played against Murray, who is another spoiled brat, but has no justification for it. At least for the moment Federer is indeed the best.
Recently, I discovered a hot place – SeekTall Co m -- where many sexy tall singles who like sports and chatting there. I'm an open minded girl from UK, I also like discuss sports and love with tall guys on it.
rafa will come back even stronger he still young he will come back as a #1 in tennis word mark my word to all rafa fans lets pray for rafa he is # 1 in all aspect not just #1 in court good bless rafa
rafa will come back even stronger he still young he will come back as a #1 in tennis word mark my word to all rafa fans lets pray for rafa he is # 1 in all aspect not just #1 in court good bless rafa
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account