Eurosport - Wed, 08 Oct 22:31:00 2008
UEFA shares the growing concern about spiralling debt in football and has set up a working party to investigate ways of controlling it, according to general secretary David Taylor.
Taylor was speaking a day after FA chairman David Triesman said that English clubs had amassed debts of around £3 billion, that transparency in the game "lies in an unmarked grave" and that even the biggest clubs were not immune from collapse.
"I was very pleased to see the statements from Lord Triesman and we also believe that the European Union shares many of our ideals about the self-regulation of sport in a free market," Taylor said.
He told the Leaders in Football conference at Chelsea's Stamford Bridge ground that a working party would meet for the first time next week to begin investigating the issue.
"This is an attempt to find greater financial stability, especially at a time when banks are failing. Governments might bail out banks but they are not going to bail out a football club," he said.
"The current system needs to be looked at, it needs more transparency. We need to look at which areas we regulate to ensure the long-term stability of the clubs.
"It is not something that will happen overnight, we are still at the stage of investigating and developing solutions, but we are concerned about the longer term."
Taylor said that UEFA was a long way from coming up with any concrete proposals but was likely to favour an extension or revision of its current licensing system whereby clubs have to satisfy various off-field criteria before being allowed to take part in Europe's club competitions.
He also echoed Triesman in dismissing the current "fit and proper persons" test for ownership as of little use in establishing the financial credentials of people looking to take over clubs.
"We showed with club licensing that these things can spread through UEFA leadership, starting with our own competitions," said Taylor, formerly head of the Scottish FA.
Ultimately, as with the current licensing system, clubs could be barred from entering the Champions League if they failed to comply with the rules but that would be an extremely unlikely situation.
"We welcome investment in football but we want stronger roots for that investment and this is an attempt to find greater stability," Taylor said.
"Many new owners or investors are not giving gifts to clubs. In most cases they are loans and ultimately the club is indebted to its benefactor.
"There are no solutions yet but we are all convinced something needs to be done."
Comment 1 - 6 of 6
Uefa is just trying to find a way to get ride of more English clubs. Real Madrid over spends and you don't see them mentioned in any of the articles about this situation. The Champions league is suppose to be about the best teams in Europe going at it, that's why it's not just another tournament. You loose that and it will be just another tournament and no one will give them much respect for being the best club in Europe since truthfully they will not be playing the best teams in Europe.
Maybe they should just make it a rule that any money gained by in debt teams in the tournament has to go to paying off their debts. Might as well call it the UEFA European No Debt tournament. Anyone interested in watching that?
Why are they bleating about this...UEFA and FiFa have done everything to make the game a big global package and get the rewards, maybe, they are losing there grip. Football is a business, we all know that, we lost the game in the 50's, like the Banks..they are no longer invincible and there will be casualities. What is happening now is nothing new but the reality is closer
Unfortunately most of the Premiership teams have been living far beyond their means for many years. Their income from gate receipts, sponsorship deals and TV money has been falling short for years. One of the main reasons for this is the greedy egotistical footballers they have to employ. Most of us mortals have to put up with pay rises of 2-3% per year where-as players demand 20 - 30 % rises or they have hissy fits and demand to leave. They still get their £100,000 a week if they are in the reserves or are injured. Why does anyone need £100,000 a week?? The Premiership is just a small example of how our countries finances have gone belly up by us living way beyond our means. I can see the time when the TV money will be reduced, due to lack of sponsorship etc, and then what will all the clubs do?? Pemiership football needs a reality check.
the champions league would be a right laugh if it was full of clubs with no debt, problem is, I dont think sunday laugue teams will be as good to watch.
who have debts? the liverpool and manchester united takeovers were both debt financed! hows that for a high profile mess up?
Who have debts?
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account