He is an amazing player , I just hope his run­ hasn't come to an end .

fedex the best man who made tenis look so great

Could'nt stand roger's way to greatness i­ should say

Funny this robert boy. He's been brandizing roger­ as cry baby. He's so bitter I can picture him­ fantically wailing probably because the player he is­ obscenely fantazising could stand roger's way to­ greatness.

robertxxx111
Try to come up with a new comment. You­ have already posted that one several times.

Stick to­ the facts about Federer's competition was a good­ idea, but you missed lots of names undermining your­ argument.

Your comments lack objectivity which is a­ shame because I am sure that a good case can be made­ against Federer being the best of all time.... however,­ you got it plain wrong. Period.

oDDo:
everybody says that Federer won because Nadal or­ Djokovici lost. Well....why did they lost? I wonder..if­ Federer would have lost in 2008 at Wimbledon before the­ final, they would say the same thing, that Nadal only­ won because Federer didn't make the final....this­ is so stupid...Federer won beacuse , this year he was­ better then the others ( Nadal, Djokovici,­ Davidenko,Murray, Roddick, Blake,Gonzalez,­ Soderling,Haas, Monfils, Matthieu, Acasuso, del Potro­ etc).I think these are big names...so the era dilema is­ also just stupid.
If nadal were that good, he­ would've made the final...

Federer is the best but watch out for Nadal. Time is on­ his side. Anyone who thinks the competition is poor­ knows nowt. The world number 100 would dominate tennis­ if you threw him back 15 years, players have improved­ so much. Its the same in all sports.

I think Roger is the greatest SINGLES player,­ especially with his shot-making ability. Last­ year's press about him being past it was laughable.­ Laver with 2 GS and Borg with 5 Wimbledon's had­ greater opposition I think (Laver had Emerson,­ Newcombe, Roche, Stolle, Rosewall and Borg had McEnroe,­ Connors).

McEnroe is the best ALL-ROUND player though­ as he was great at singles and doubles (though his­ playing character left something to be desired). Laver,­ Emerson, Newcombe must be close.

Nadal (as Connors,­ McEnroe, Sampras) have mental strength I think Roger­ slightly lacks. More interesting to me is how long­ Nadal will last in terms of injury. Most commentators­ seem to think his superlative aggressive style is not­ maintainable injury-free over several years.

It amazes me some of the critics of Federer. When­ confronted they always seem to know little about the­ actual game of Tennis. Always finding excuses for­ things.

Common one is that Federer had no competition­ compared to Sampras. I disagree. Roddick and Hewiit­ were his competetion and he just dominated them in­ Grand Slams finals and semi-finals. Hasn't he also­ beaten Murrey and Djokovic in the U.S Open finals and­ beated Novak in the semi-finals last year?

To the­ Federer haters that won't be enough but what about­ this?

Tin Henman played both Sampras and Federer in­ their primes and says Roger was the better all round­ player.

ANDRE AGASSI played both Sampras and Federer­ in their primes and said Roger was the tougher opponent­ to play.

Not to mention Conners, McEnroe, Laver,­ Agassi and Sampras all say HE IS THE GREATEST OF ALL­ TIME!

Do the words of Tennis legends mean nothing to­ the Fed haters? Or do you prefer to live in a fantasy­ world of denial of reality!

It amazes me some of the critics of Federer. When­ confronted they always seem to know little about the­ actual game of Tennis. Always finding excuses for­ things.

Common one is that Federer had no competition­ compared to Sampras. I disagree. Roddick and Hewiit­ were his competetion and he just dominated them in­ Grand Slams finals and semi-finals. Hasn't he also­ beaten Murrey and Djokovic in the U.S Open finals and­ beated Novak in the semi-finals last year?

To the­ Federer haters that won't be enough but what about­ this?

Tin Henman played both Sampras and Federer in­ their primes and says Roger was the better all round­ player.

ANDRE AGASSI played both Sampras and Federer­ in their primes and said Roger was the tougher opponent­ to play.

Not to mention Conners, McEnroe, Laver,­ Agassi and Sampras all say HE IS THE GREATEST OF ALL­ TIME!

Do the words of Tennis legends mean nothing to­ the Fed haters? Or do you prefer to live in a fantasy­ world of denial of reality!

heartiest congrats from your favourite 66 yr. old fan. ­ I never miss a match of yours as you are a dream to­ watch. None of your grunting, etc. we see from so many­ of the players. Just pure speed and gracefulness and­ perfect shotmaking. Keep it up and I'm looking­ forward to Wimbledon already. You are such a­ gentleman, never swearing like Murray and others. Good­ luck to Merka and baby.

WOI fan

"robertxxx111"is another username by­ "Rc_Alcock".This m o r o n just proved to the­ world how i d i o t i c he is and always will­ be.He's the greatest loser in this forum/Roger IS­ THE BEST PLAYER OF ALL TIMES.RESPECT Mr FEDERER...

Opinions are like a face; everyboby has one,and they­ are entitled to be seen. Who is better or best is­ always a passionate relative argument anywhere,­ anytime, anyplace. However, facts and statistics speak­ for themselves and are undeniable: The only players to­ win 14 GS are Sampras and Federer, and between the two­ of them only Federer has won a career Grand Slam, so­ you be the judge. The arguments about era are also­ relative, and besides I used to read on this same page­ how Federer was finished, in decline etc. It begs the­ question: What happened to Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, and­ co? They all played in this years RG and none of them­ even made the semifinals. When you compare that to­ Federer who has made Five consecutive GS finals (I will­ not try to count consecutive GS semifinal appearances)­ you are looking at a man who has to be appreciated.­ When Legends like Agassi, Sampras, Borg, Mcenroe are­ acknowledging him, I really wonder why ignorant people­ (myself inclusive) should question their judgement.­ Finally, all the hate-mail and emotion-ridden opinions­ on this page amount to NOTHING. The man (Federer) is­ winning more titles, making more money, and frankly­ doesnt give a f*** about all our talk.

All these guys that still failed to accept RF as the­ greatest are just bunch of fools who doesn't know­ anything about tennis.They needs to be told the history­ of the game by the former champion and even the current­ players 'Nadal , Murray , Gonzalez

All these guys that still failed to accept RF as the­ greatest are just bunch of fools who doesn't know­ anything about tennis.They needs to be told the history­ of the game by the former champion and even the current­ 'Nadal'.

robertxxx111.............. I think you are sick. Do you­ have any medical record in the past. Be mindful of your­ words before everyone classfy you as an enemy of­ success. ENVY - is feeling that someone got what you­ deserved.

this robertxxx111 guy is interesting, he posted the­ same rubbish last week, i dont think he is real, dont­ take what he says to heart.

I am very sorry for you robertxxx111. You are so­ miserable,but whatever you write you can not change the­ fact that Roger Federer is one wonderful tennis player,­ maybe the best of all time.

The fact that Melvin listed Henman and Bjorkman in­ Sampras era tells you all you need to know about this­ stupid so called Tennis fan.

Also wasn't Hewitt­ in Rogers so called era? what about Agassi? Henman?­ Haas? Mark. P (philiposis) as you called him? He has­ beaten these people in grand slam finals and­ semi-finals. Also erm who did Roger beat in Aussie­ open finals? Gonzales and Bagdatis? as well as­ Djorkovic and Murray in the U.S open finals!

What a­ loser! Ignorant on absolute basics of Tennis. Just­ ignore this idiot everyone. Clearly knows nothing about­ the game.