well done Nole:)

Bloody hell what has poor Novak done to deserve such­ antagonism? He's a really nice bloke and it's­ silly to thumbs down people who congratulate him. If­ Roger had won, I would have congratuated him - but he­ didn't. No big deal. And no need to be childish,­ after all Mr Fed has won quite a few tournaments­ hasn't he?? (Just a few!!!!!).

thanks Nicholas :-)
.. why 20 negative votes ? read­ post #36..

Lol Igor, I posted No 12 and got over 20 negatives what­ did I say? Was there a spelling mistake?

Igor I'm a big Murray fan as you know, but having­ Djokovic back playing great tennis again makes such a­ difference I must say. We are all very lucky! ;)

Djokovic is simply the best

Joker is also not joking ajpbolton ;-)

well Nicholas, I already wrote this on Murray’s­ page:
"Murray and Djokovic are the future of­ tennis, some like it or not"…
… but in which order­ No1. and No 2.. time will tell ;-)
I can say for­ Novak, that he is definitely number two after AO, cause­ I don’t see potential from Nadal currently to defend­ the title, sad for his fans, and I admire his game, but­ I think he can’t.

Milos surely you mean
Well done Novak, well done Murray­ Next year No.2 & No.1 ;)
What say you Igor?

Well, Ray V - you've got two out of three, actually­ - the win and the medical timeout.

That Federer lost­ his focus on winning a fourth successive title in his­ hometown tournament because of Djokovic being on the­ other side is, on the other hand, fairly gratuitous on­ your part. Oh, and it's 'lose' and not­ 'loose'.

thanks igor k! i wasn't joking though.

ha ha ha ajpbolton you are so funny man :-)

Did Djokovic deserved the win?
Yes(thumbs up)­­
No(thumbs down)

.. and Ray, we all know what you are writing about Nole­ for a long time..
At least, you coud congratulate­ him.
I hope one day you will learn..

True that match was not on very high level - both were­ making lots of mistakes. Federer made more, and that­ maybe decided the match. But take this in mind: Novak­ always had a game plan to defeat Federer, he is­ tactically playing well, with deep balls, and making­ the Roger run more from side to side, which is forcing­ good part of his errors. But Novak sometimes does not­ have stability to fulfill this plan. Sometimes he’s­ playing to soft, letting the initiative to Fed, who­ then takes this "gift" with both hands.
But­ not this time ! what Novak showed on this tournament is­ that he is grown up person, stabile, he acted very­ calmed and determent in hard situation.. didn’t lose­ the nerve, didn’t brake the rackets ;-) I’m very­ pleased with the whole picture - I see again the player­ who aiming to the real top, one day.
Federer didn’t­ look very good yesterday, and through the whole­ tournament.. looked like “I’m to old for this @#$%” ;-)­
but I learned that never he is to be underestimated,­ And I’m sure he has still lot more to show of his magic­ ! maybe outcome of this match could be different if he­ maybe didn’t felt the pressure of home ground, I think­ he did.. this was disadvantage, not a boost this­ time.
Anyway very good work Nole.. , great achievement­ :-)

Well done Novak,well done Murray.Next year No.1 &­ No 2.

Well done Novak,well done Murray.Next year No.1 &­ No 2.

What a refreshing change! x

My wasn't Fed v Djok match televised. i dont watch­ murray's matches as they are so bias in the­ commentry. i would love to being british, but it must­ be fair commentary. over the years i tend not to watch­ any british players matches including Tim Henman. i­ would have loved to see Fed v Djok though. If you could­ have non bias commentary then i would once again watch­ the british players.