Eurosport - Fri, 10 Jul 11:04:00 2009
Australia captain Ricky Ponting and opener Simon Katich scored unbeaten centuries during a second-wicket partnership of 189 on the second day of the first Ashes Test against England.
At the close, Australia had reached 249 for one in reply to England's 435 all out with Ponting on 100 and Katich on 104.
Ponting, who became the fourth man to score 11,000 Test runs, scrambled a single to reach his 38th Test hundred off the penultimate ball of the day.
Katich's painstaking innings, his eighth Test century, lasted nearly four and a half hours.
England captain Andrew Strauss rotated his bowlers, adjusted his fields and tried every ploy he could think of but was denied a breakthrough by the combination of a slow pitch and the skill and unremitting concentration of the two Australians.
Andrew Flintoff, returning to the team after a knee operation, took the only wicket to fall during a magnificent six-over spell immediately after lunch.
Australia opener Phillip Hughes, who scored 415 runs at 69.16 in his debut series in South Africa this year, gave a glimpse of his penchant for the unorthodox by slashing four boundaries through the off-side before lunch.
After the interval, Strauss threw the ball to Flintoff and the big all-rounder responded by charging in from around the wicket from the River end and bowling four bouncers in his opening over.
He regularly exceeded 145km an hour, beat Hughes several times outside the off-stump and dropped Katich on 10 from a difficult return chance low to his right hand.
Flintoff was finally rewarded when Hughes, who had scored only eight runs in 24 deliveries after lunch to reach 36, edged a catch to wicketkeeper Matt Prior who took a fine catch low to his right.
Graeme Swann, whose breezy 47 not out from 40 balls in the morning session helped push England beyond 400, bowled five maiden overs in a row from the Cathedral Road end.
But the Australian batsmen resolutely refused to take any chances with Katich content to work the ball both sides of the pitch and Ponting pushing it for singles with the occasional swift-footed pull.
James Anderson failed to get the ball to swing, Monty Panesar's left-arm spin proved innocuous and fast bowler Stuart Broad left the field for treatment on a calf strain.
At the start of the day England added 99 in 16.5 overs after resuming on 336 for seven.
Swann added 68 for the ninth wicket with James Anderson (26) and looked set to reach his second Test half-century when Monty Panesar was caught at slip by Ponting off off-spinner Nathan Hauritz for four.
Comment 27 - 46 of 46
The Australian top five batsmen was always a very strong line-up and anyone knew that long before they landed;but what seems to me to be the real difference so far is that the Aussie batters are playing test cricket - that is, batting over 5 days rather than 5 overs - which is something some of the English batters have forgotten, if they ever knew it in the first place. In the first innings of a test-match you need two centuries from your top six to make a decent start - not fifties and sixties.
well no wonder the poms can,t win all there supporters think they got no chance .
come on let have a great game of cricket after all we Aussie's love to win hate to lose .
so please make it a contest .
And can,t you poms just one stop wining about your players get behind them .
And may the best team win .
Come on Aussie's come on
The Transporter
Here comes the rain thank god for british weather.
I wonder what the excuses will be today. Wrong make of ball?? Too warm, too cold,?? not enough breeze, too humid,?? pitch, tide, umpires,??
The simple facts seem to be that our openers cannot perform unless every condition is perfect, our spinners don't seem capable of spinning unless the pitch is broken up, and Freddie can only bowl in short bursts.
I hope I am proved wrong because I would love us the beat the Aussies, but I can't see us taking 20 wickets.
Ex Sydney Sider,
Go on cobbers,Sort the poms out.
One thing I've noticed, and feel free to say I'm barking up the wrong tree, but the Aussies have always had the right combination of openers to build a score and more importantly, scuff up the new ball. Langer & Hayden were a great combination. Hayden was a bludgener of the ball who knocked it so hard that it's effectiveness was wasted after 8 overs. Langer on the other hand was a shot player and much more orthodox, technical player. the combination meant a good opening partnership & a lot of overs with an average ball. Katich & Hughes are much the same. Hughes came out and knocked the skin off the ball, Katich played technical shots. They built a good foundation and scuffed up the ball which meant the quicks were less effective.
now look at England. Cook & Strauss are both excellent batsmen, but are both of the same mould. Technical and attractive (shot makers!). But they don't damage the new ball enough, so the Aussie quicks are able to use it's effectiveness for much longer. Just my thoughts, and I'm no expert, but it does answer some questions.
This one will be a draw unless Punter and Katich come out and knock it around a bit, and then the Aussies could edge it.
Englands bowlers and batsmen should certainly take head of the professional approach adopted by the Aussies. No flash reverse sweeps, playing across the line etc. Ok in 20/20, but this is REAL cricket. The England bowlers were also poor. A new ball is not going to change much unless they bowl line and length. Australia pace bowlers dug something out of the wicket by maintaining a good line and pitching the ball up. Who needs Brett Lee!! Anderson without assistance from the conditions is pretty ordinary, likewise Broad. Flintoff is a strike bowler for short bursts. The spinners are not getting anything either. England need a breakthrough and fast or Ponting and Katich will still be there over Christmas!
so much for england having good spin bowlers!
Nigel C is right. This game remains very much in the balance. With a couple of quick wickets today, and Australia having to bat last, the outcome could be a spine-tingler
Still all to play for people, the wicket may favour the bowling in the 2nd Aussie innings, they are still a bit of a way behind us, so lets not slate the guys after 2 days of the series, lets back 'em all the way coz that's what they really need to help them perform to their best. C'mon England you've had your warm up, lets knock 'em over today..............Failing that,... pray for rain !!!
After reading all the above,once again,denigration comes up trumps...A lot of what is said is basically true, but the simply fact is, England are lacking on the opening bowling front, sheer pace, line,length and team work...
Take Statham & Trueman,, Shatham,line, length and pace, Freddy, sheer (Yorkshire)pace to knock um over..No prisoners!!
All we can do is support what we have,,,so come on,,debating the problems want make any diffrence, they are still Pontin in the right direction...
THON BYE AT NAMBAR 16 FINKS I HAY LOADS A NEEMS. A DINNAE. A ANLAY HOV TEEM FAE WAN. OM A BASAY MON YEES SEES.
A OM FINKAN AV GETTAN MESELL A CRACKAT BOT OND GOAN DOON TAY THA LOCAL CRACKAT PATCH TAY HOV A WEE GEEM A CRACKAT. BAT ANLAY FING AS A HAY NAYWAN TAY PLAY WATH. SA WAT OM GOANAY DAY AS TEECH ME WEE DOOGIE HOO TAY BOWL OND THAN A CON FROW AT TA MAY OND THEN ILL HAT AT TAY FACK.
The England Team fell behind on day 1, the pitch has done nothing for 2 days, it was horrible shots that cost Petterson's wicket and Bopari shows that he is really just a mediocre batsman, the openers was suspect, England had the better of the condition If the likes of Bopari, Petterson and Collingwood was still around on day 2, England would be looking at 600 in 2 days, the pitch does nothing at the moment, none of the batsmen was tested on day 2, England just stuffed up on day 1, which cost them any advantage
The problem is every time the media 'hype' up the England team the Aussies set the record straight, as they did today,as far as Harmison is concerned he would struggle to frighten an old lady, Flintoff's time has come and gone, the rest of the England bowlers are simply not test quality, as confirmed by today's effort, same old problem, selectors again letting the country down, plenty of good players not being given a chance, Ned Kelly
attaha
God you not half spout some garbage; you are bad enough on the tennis forums, don't come on here stirring your racially inflammatory nonsense!
lol there are no decent black players in english cricket at the moment .. and the last decent one was chris lewis and he is a druggy lol .. you see its simple balck cricket people are usually of jamacan origion and ususally are proud of this and would prefer to represent there "home" nation .. and to right ...
attaha are you for real? The west indies is predominantly black, and I dont know of any decent black English cricketers at the moment, but if you know any please let me know. We have plenty of british asian players in or around the team at the moment.
Attaha, that's a very good question. I would prefer to think it wasn't a matter of racism and I don't think the evidence supports it. For instance there are many young Asian cricketers playing first class cricket and making it into the England team. There are some young black professional cricketers but many, many more black professional footballers. I suspect the youngsters are nowadsys more inclined to try to make it a footballer as the financial rewards are that much greater.
Just to continue from what i was writing earlier, al I read coming into this ashes series is that England have a far superior bowling line up, to which I agree, compared to that of Australia. Problem is that we have some bloody good batsmen as well. The bowlers can only do so much, the rest comes down to what the Captain can bring to the game, an where good Captains(Waugh, Vaughan, Border etc), can change a game. Lets hope for the game and series that Struass has something up his sleeve, (which I am sure he has)
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account