Premier League - Cahill appeals Emirates red

PA Sport - Mon, 13 Sep 14:53:00 2010

Bolton defender Gary Cahill has appealed to the FA against the red card he received in Saturday's Premier League match against Arsenal.

Miss a Match? We didn't

Watch Arsenal's 24-pass masterpiece

Cahill was dismissed for his foul from behind on Arsenal striker Marouane Chamakh after 64 minutes of the Emirates Stadium clash.

Arsenal, who led 2-1 at the time, went on to win the match 4-1.

The appeal will be held by a regulatory commission on Tuesday, the FA announced.

Bolton manager Owen Coyle was disappointed by referee Stuart Attwell's decision to judge the foul as a sending-off offence, saying on Saturday: "I don't think it merited a red.

"All of a sudden we were playing Arsenal with 10 men, and it is difficult at the best of times with 11.

"We had put so much into the game that at that time we looked like the team who would get the equaliser."

Miss a Match? We didn't

Arsenal 4 Bolton 1

PA Sport

Comment 1 - 11 of 11

Sort comments by: Most recent | Most rated
  1. Arsenal were very lucky they had Stuart Attwell on­ their side for this match .... i wonder how much it­ cost you to pay him off?

    Cahill's tackle WAS NOT a­ red card, and what happened when Lee was fouled seconds­ earlier ... oh no foul, what a surprise.

    Another case­ of the Bolton School of Football vs the Arsenal School­ of Falling Over and Bribing Refs!

    From S, on Wed 15 Sep 3:47
  2. maybe we should call #3 shuja.......NOT, lol

    From sanchez.santos, on Wed 15 Sep 0:56
  3. @ No. 3 Shuja i don't think you are an Arsenal fan,­ neither do you know the rules of the game that football­ is seriously! I am surprised that you can claim that­ the challenge on Chamakh did not warrant a red! Cahill­ infact should be banned for 3 games. Just the fact that­ Chamakh did not feign serious injury by being a real­ sports person does not mean there was real danger to­ his tools of trade(Legs). Even boxing, wrestling and­ rugby the most violent games have rules and if you­ flout you get punished for it. Remember a referee does­ not have the benefit of a replay and time to analyze­ like you, he does a split second decision with the­ rules at the back of his mind. How serious the foul is­ or was will be left to you and me to judge later. By­ the way Shuja means brave in my Swahili language and­ your comments does not depict bravery.

    From alfred, on Tue 14 Sep 23:38
  4. Coyle, just because you feel sorry for yourself and­ your wasted fouling efforts, doesn't mean the foul­ wasn't an attempt to slaughter the player from­ behind. Are you going to appeal to get Robinson's­ hack on Diaby a red card while your there too, and what­ about Davies consistent lunge attempts to kill­ someone?

    It was a rather pub-like performance,­ rubbish.

    From chris, on Tue 14 Sep 21:15
  5. shuja, I guess you should look in the rule book as you­ don't seem to have a clue yourself. When you have­ both feet off the ground you have no control of your­ tackle. This is why it is deemed dangerous. Luckily­ this time there was no injury. But what would everyone­ say if he done that on someone like Rooney or Milner­ and broke their legs. Everyone would be calling for a­ long ban.
    However on your second issue on 2 yellow­ cards you have a point. Yes a player should get red for­ something like 2 bad tackles, or deliberate handball.­ But should he go for somthing like showing passion and­ taking off his shirt? But this is more down to the­ rules not the refs. Maybe some lesser offences a player­ could just be reported by the ref, but not issued a­ yellow card in the game. This way he can still be­ punished for the offence, but gives the ref a chance to­ keep 11 v 11 on the pitch

    From JULIAN B, on Tue 14 Sep 15:27
  6. shuja (post 3), if a footballer tries to punch someone­ in the face but misses he'll still get sent off.­ The red card is not for how much or how little damage­ is caused to the player, but for the potential for it,­ and the offending player's recklessness. The law of­ the game says that a straight red card should be issued­ if a tackle is deemed to be dangerous, and a two footed­ tackle from behind IS dangerous - on two counts! If­ Cahill had caught Chamakh square on his ankle there is­ no way he could have pulled back from the challenge,­ and Chamakh could have been out for half the season­ with a broken leg. We've seen it happen to Arsenal­ players three times in very recent history, and­ it's about time the law was applied properly,­ strictly, and fairly. If that means there are red cards­ shown every week then, personally, I'm all for it,­ as long as it makes the game safer. Players have to­ learn to control themselves, both in the game and in­ life. There's nothing worse than seeing players­ getting injured in the way Diaby, Eduardo and Ramsey­ have been, whatever team they play for.

    From MK, on Tue 14 Sep 13:34
  7. Sorry Mr Cahill but a two footed challenge from behind,­ it's a straight red card ! Why are people­ complaining? Because Chamakh didn't get his leg­ broken? And what about Kevin Davies challenges on­ Rosicky and then on another player? Should have been 2­ yellows ! What about Robinson tackle on Diaby? The lad­ had to come off the pitch !! Not even a foul. So stop­ complaining Bolton though I can understand a 4-1 loss­ is hard to take...

    From teapsky, on Tue 14 Sep 7:03
  8. They Should Call it two yellows ,As he is an England­ player Now he obviously needs to be like the rest of­ the England team and be protected by the FA.

    From Elliot Fairclough, on Tue 14 Sep 7:02
  9. That was never a red card. Max was yellow. He did catch­ the player from behind but all he clipped was the guys­ ankle/heel. In fact, ref should have allowed play to­ continue & then come back to book Cahill. If you­ genuinely believe that tackle warranted a red card then­ you don't have a clue about football - seriously!­ And i'm an arsenal fan & i like to see our­ players play without being hacked but you got to accept­ physical contact in the game. Not every foul can be­ deemed a yellow. Look at lee catermole, his second­ offence warranted a yellow card but did his 1st tackle­ warrant a booking? I don't think so but cos­ he'd already been booked he had to be sent of and­ the game was ruined. That's how ref's ruin good­ football games!

    From shuja, on Tue 14 Sep 7:01
  10. I'm a Cahill fan yet I think the tackle warranted a­ Red. The biggest problem is that he quite rightly got­ sent off but Colocinni dished out a worse tackle and­ got a yellow. The consistency is dreadful

    From Paul C, on Tue 14 Sep 6:12
  11. Two footed off the ground challenge from behind, that­ says it all. Hope they increase the ban for a frivalous­ appeal.

    From Fed up with Britain, on Tue 14 Sep 5:48
Sort comments by: Most recent | Most rated

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account