Lotus return to F1 as Sauber miss out

Eurosport - Tue, 15 Sep 23:36:00 2009

Lotus, one of the most successful and glorious names from Formula One's past, will return next year with a Malaysian-owned team replacing BMW-Sauber as the 13th entry on the starting grid.

FORMULA 1 - Ayrton Senna's 1986 Lotus car
 - 0

The governing FIA said that, after due diligence and an intensive selection process, it had chosen Lotus.

The new outfit will be called Lotus F1 Team and is a partnership between the Malaysian government and a consortium of Malaysian entrepreneurs.

"The cars will be made in Malaysia, by Malaysians," the Malaysian government said.

The vacancy arose after BMW announced that they were withdrawing at the end of the season, following a path already trodden by Japan's Honda.

The FIA said BMW-Sauber, who are still seeking a buyer, had been given a reserve slot to fill any vacancy that might occur between now and the start of the 2010 championship.

"In addition, the FIA believes that a good case can be made for expanding the grid to 14 teams," added the FIA.

"The FIA will be consulting urgently with the existing teams regarding the introduction of an appropriate rule change to expand the grid to 28 cars in time for the first Grand Prix in 2010."

Leading Malaysian entrepreneur Tony Fernandes will be Lotus team principal.

The 45-year-old set up Asian budget airline Air Asia, currently sponsoring the Williams team, and is Malaysia's 15th richest man with a net worth of £133 million according to Forbes Malaysia 2009 rich list.

Technical director Mike Gascoyne was previously with Force India, their predecessors Jordan, Toyota and Renault.

"It will be a big challenge to get on the grid but certainly by mid-season I think we'd clearly like to be the best of the new teams and by the end of the year I would hope we have broken into the top 10 overall," Gascoyne told autosport.

"With the team that Tony Fernandes has put together, and the backing of the Malaysian government, it has the opportunity to be something really big. We are aiming to take this team to the very top level in the long term."

As part of its application to compete in the 2010 championship, the Lotus team agreed an engine supply deal with Cosworth.

Lotus will initially be based in Norfolk, some 10 miles from the original Lotus Cars factory in Eastern England, but the future design, manufacturing and technical centre will be purpose built at Malaysia's Sepang International Circuit.

"The team will announce its two drivers by October 31, 2009. Currently six local and international drivers have been selected," the Malaysian government said.

Three teams had been on the FIA shortlist for the 13th slot: Lotus, a BMW-Sauber entry to be renamed under eventual new ownership and Spain's Epsilon Euskadi.

The original Lotus won seven Formula One constructors' titles and six drivers' crowns between 1963 and 1978 under the inspirational leadership of the late Colin Chapman, one of the most innovative engineers in the sport.

Chapman died of a heart attack in 1982 and the company slid into administration in 1994 after giving the late Brazilian Ayrton Senna his first victory in 1985.

British great Jim Clark spent his entire F1 career with Lotus, winning two titles. The team's other champions include compatriot Graham Hill, Brazilian Emerson Fittipaldi and American Mario Andretti.

In 1970 the team's Austrian driver Jochen Rindt became the sport's only posthumous champion.

The right to the Lotus F1 name was acquired by David Hunt, brother of the 1976 champion James, while the British-based car company was bought by Malaysiam state-owned Proton.

Reuters

Comment 169 - 188 of 188

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. Anderson Y, Malaysian driver Fairuz Fauzy out-classed­ Jamie Alguesuari in first race of Renault 3.5 world­ series last night at Nurburgring to finish second on­ the podium. Overall Fauzy is only 13 points behind­ Jamie, who is currently second in the championship with­ another 3 race to go. If Torro Rosso can have faith in­ Jamie as their F1 replacement driver, dont see why­ Lotus F1 can't give a Malaysian i.e Fairuz Fauzy a­ shot at it too. Not all successful F1 drivers have to­ come through GP2, and neither is it something new that­ some teams would at times put in preference for­ national drivers.

    From Ade Irawan D, on Sun 20 Sep 8:26AM
  2. For the 1st season of Lotus F1, no Malaysian should be­ driving for Lotus F1. Send those local driver to GP2­ first. They can only graduate to F1 if they can get top­ 3 in overall GP2 championship! Do the right thing­ Fernandez! Don't be the typical stupid Malaysian...­ They are very little smart people in Malaysia,­ hopefully Fernandez is a smart one to realize no­ Malaysian driver is good enough for F1. I know the­ Malaysian Government is full of stupid people who wants­ a Malaysian driver to drive in Lotus F1, hopefully that­ get no say in driver line-up. Merit should be above­ everything, nationality of driver should not play a­ role in deciding driver line-up. Smart people will know­ that, stupid people will say Malaysian should get an F1­ seat in Lotus F1.

    From Anderson, on Thu 17 Sep 1:01PM
  3. jdjrf1, what u r saying is Gascoyne can contribute to a­ F1 car. However, he is unable to improve in further to­ make it a winning car. U said Gascoyne design the 05­ renault, but someone else improve it in 06 to make it a­ winning car. Gascoyne again design Force india car in­ 07 and 08, after he left, someone else improve it to­ make it so competative now! It's much easier to­ design a F1 car than to improve it to a winning F1­ car!! Clearly Gayscone cannot design a winning F1 car­ and are unable to improve the car he designed. Lotus F1­ really needs someone more capable than Gascoyne

    From Anderson, on Thu 17 Sep 12:52PM
  4. Just a quick note on the GB, UK, England thing... It­ was ALL considered England before WW II... The History­ of England included Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland,­ Canada, Australia, etc. The distinctions between­ England and the rest of GB/UK have only arisen­ relatively recently. (But Harleyboy is a fool­ nonetheless).
    :)

    From Abbinator, on Thu 17 Sep 3:28AM
  5. octaneoverboost,thanks for your advice. However­ I'm 63 so I'm not a kid. I well remember Lotus­ (for many years painted BRG) and a winning tradition­ with drivers such as Clark, Hill, Moss, Rindt,­ Fittipaldi and Andretti as I was a big Lotus fan. ­ Regardless, I'm not saying that the Malaysians­ don't have the right to buy a team, clearly they­ do. But they really only bought the name, not the­ history. And if their automotive advances are as you­ say, wouldn't a new name reflecting these advances­ possibly highlighting their Malaysian roots be more­ appropritate?

    From David, on Thu 17 Sep 12:57AM
  6. Anderson. If it wasn't for mike gasgoyne alonso­ wouldn't have won his titles. He designed the 05­ and that was the basis for the 06. He tends to set the­ groundwork for a good car

    From jdjrf1, on Wed 16 Sep 7:34PM
  7. ddtruax, You're obviously a kid, or you're from­ another planet. Where do you think the Timberland shoes­ are made now? You've no knowledge about the­ Malaysian's advancement in auto technology, please­ go to back school.

    From Overboost, on Wed 16 Sep 4:59PM
  8. if it wasn`t for proton and malaysia lotus would be­ nothing but a memory. think back to minardi italian or­ english force india indian or english who cares as­ long as theres good racing!!!!!

    From jumbuck1968, on Wed 16 Sep 3:03PM
  9. If the F1 cars are to be built in Malaysia, they're­ not Lotus F-1's. Maybe the owners and investors­ bought the rights to the name, but they should consider­ renaming the team.

    From David, on Wed 16 Sep 2:41PM
  10. Lotus owned 100% by Malyasians,cars designed and bulit­ in Malaya,then its not
    a Lotus is it? Colin Chapman­ and Jim Clark must be turning in their graves.

    From ANDREW G, on Wed 16 Sep 2:20PM
  11. 12- Yes, I am stupid and yes Toyota are based in­ Germany, but the point is even more valid because of­ this.

    From Cashel, on Wed 16 Sep 1:49PM
  12. The Ashes are a waste of time..they will be hoovered­ up­ the next time we can be bothered vacuuming the­ place.

    From corneilius, on Wed 16 Sep 1:10PM
  13. It's stupid to get Mike Gascoyne involvements. Mike­ Gascoyne is always in the team that never perform well­ and that's because Mike Gascoyne never done his job­ well. With over 20 years of experience but no­ constructor championship for the team he works for­ during his employment, Mike Gascoyne is definitely not­ a good option and it seems like Malaysian have a­ tendency to make stupid decision.

    I just hope there is­ no more stupid decision from this Malaysian teams. But­ there is one stupid decision that is likely to be made;­ they will put a Malaysian driver. At the moment no­ Malaysian driver is good enough to be in F1 because­ they are not champion in GP2 or any other Formula­ races. Only when a Malaysian driver is a GP2 champion­ or A1GP champion, then he deserve an F1 set

    From Anderson, on Wed 16 Sep 12:14PM
  14. It's stupid to get Mike Gayscone involvements. Mike­ Gayscone is always in the team that never perform well­ and that's because Mike Gayscone never done his job­ well. With over 20 years of experience but no­ constructor championship for the team he works for­ during his employment, Mike Gayscone is definitely not­ a good option and it seems like Malaysian have a­ tendency to make stupid decision.

    I just hope there is­ no more stupid decision from this Malaysian teams. But­ there is one stupid decision that is likely to be made;­ they will put a Malaysian driver. At the moment no­ Malaysian driver is good enough to be in F1 because­ they are not champion in GP2 or any other Formula­ races.

    From Anderson, on Wed 16 Sep 12:04PM
  15. hi cashel are u stupid toyota f1 cars are not built in­ the uk they built in germany

    From 12, on Wed 16 Sep 11:43AM
  16. I reply to no one with the word PINGU in the middle of­ his name lospinguinosnovuelan.

    From Cashel, on Wed 16 Sep 10:44AM
  17. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    I have entered here just to see if your countrymen­­ Mr.hamilton is OK after kissing the wall in the last­­ lap... but I can see no information about this­­ issue¿?¿?
    In case that wall has to be re-built up­ again,­ please contact me.
    Best regards,
    Spanish­ builder.
    PD We­ can offer you discounts... 3 walls for­ the price of­ 2,etc

    From lospinguinosnovuelan, on Wed 16 Sep 9:41AM
  18. Oh by the way, on the drivers front, F1 is a commercial­ enterprise and Drivers with something to offer in the­ way of sponsorship etc have been employed for decades.­ Colin Chapman used to employ them, thats how Nigel­ Mansell got his break, with Lotus. He PAID for his­ drive in his first year. I too hope that the drivers­ are selected on skills alone, but no one here is­ slating the long line of Japenese drivers that have­ occupied a car that just happens to have a Japenese­ engine. Go all the way back to Lotus again in the­ 80's who had a third wheel of a driver just to­ secure there engine deal and Williams today. Stop all­ this half arssed snobbery! The world don't work­ like this and there are plenty of examples both past­ and very present that people are choosing not to see.

    From Cashel, on Wed 16 Sep 8:37AM
  19. There seems to be alot of bad feelings because Lotus is­ now Malaysian. I don't see a problem with this. No­ one complained when Jaguar came to race, they where­ american. No one complains about the German Merc engine­ that is winning all the races at the moment, its­ designed and built in the UK. No one complains that­ Renault, a French team, are built and designed in the­ UK, same for the Japanese Toyota and until recently­ Honda. So what, they are Malaysian and they SAVED lotus­ from the scrap heap, turned out some great sprots cars­ in the true spirit of Colin Chapman, so as some of you­ are suggesting, Colin Chapman would not be turning in­ his grave, he loved racing and I personally think that­ not only would he be proud of cars like the Elise etc­ that have been built on his principles of a sports car,­ he also would like to see team Lotus still racing. Most­ of the teams on the grid today where founded by long­ dead racing giants (or at least retired) and there­ companys have changed hands many times in one form or­ another. Mr Mclaren no longer runs Mclaren are Ferrari­ are just a branch of Fiat. Having an unbroken heratige­ means nothing. No one slated BMW for being Swiss and­ setting up there racing team again did they. Companys­ change hands, if not in name then in share holders etc.­ If you can't handle this then stop supporting F1,­ because what have you got left, Mr Williams (god bless­ him) and um well, I am sure there are one or two more,­ isnt there? Oh Red Bull, thats another morfed team,­ built in the a country far away from its owners? Do you­ think that Ken Tryell would want Renault to fail just­ because they bought the team (then Benneton) or would­ he like to think "thats the team I started, look­ at them go". Who can say!

    From Cashel, on Wed 16 Sep 8:27AM
  20. Bikefan @170. it will take 300 idle people here to run­ it.

    From , on Wed 16 Sep 8:05AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account