Eurosport - Wed, 17 Jun 08:31:00 2009
American Tyler Hamilton has been given an eight-year ban by the United States Anti-Doping Agency after testing positive for a prohibited substance for a second time.
The 38-year-old, who captured the gold medal in the individual time trial at the 2004 Athens Olympics before slipping into a series of doping scandals, had already announced his retirement from the sport in April.
"In the sport of cycling, eight years ineligibility for a 38-year-old athlete is effectively a lifetime ban, and an assurance that he is penalised for what would have been the remainder of his competitive cycling career," USADA chief executive officer Travis Tygart said.
Hamilton acknowledged in April that he had tested positive for the steroid DHEA (Dehydroepiandrosterone) during an out-of-competition test on Feb. 9 while he was training for the Tour of California.
The American said he was battling depression and admitted taking an over-the-counter homeopathic anti-depressant containing DHEA.
Hamilton's Olympic victory was tarnished by doping allegations. Later that year he was suspended after testing positive for blood doping at the 2004 Tour of Spain.
Comment 5 - 24 of 24
Depression - more like cold turkey.
His depression was probably brought on by his underlying feelings of guilt knowing that he was a cheat & a liar & knowing that his many fans (me included) thought he was an honest clean rider.
8 years is too much no?
Let's not forget that doping or no doping, the man still came in 5th in the TDF with a broken collar bone. Doping aside, that takes guts.
Blah Blah Blah he already retired USADA snooze you lose.
too little too late, if they had given him an 8 year ban 5 years ago we wouldn't have to tolerate reading about this @#$% now
and this is "news" because? We just cannot seem to stop glorifying these @$$holes with our attention, (me included)
c'mon guys... he's lying... AGAIN!! stop being such suckers for the BS!
if he was legit depressed and wanted meds for it he could have gone to a doctor at any drop-in clinic and got meds and the UCI would have not banned him... he might have even got meds that didn't contain any banned substance.
he has some of the stupidest, nonsensical excuses for using dope... this one makes about as much sense as the vanishing twin excuse from the last time around..
as P.T Barnum said... there's a sucker born every minute... and it seems a lot of them frequent this board.
@dellortodavide - c'mon, making the racing shorter does nothing to reduce cheating, shorter races are just ridden faster.. and people will still dope.
do people take dope for the shortest events... 60m, 100m in track and field.. HELL YES!! some of the biggest violators... this distance, number of days changes nothing.
it is known that when a rider is sick and the Docter can justify given him a medication that contain banned substance that the Rider wil NOT be banned and will be allowd to take his medication....the think is that Hamilton could not and can not justify taking what he call medication against depression...in fact there is a lot of medications against depression that not contain any banned subctance.
to me he is a disgrace to cylcing trying to aproche cylinig supporters as riduculous peoples..h's A sample tested positif in olympic gams but he have the honor to keep the medal..maybe this is the reason why he become depressif!!
He should never be banned. It was his twin what done it!
I've always liked Tyler, and I'm sad to see his career come to an ignominious end. I don't like the fact that cyclists feel they need and/or want to dope to be competitive, but it's just human nature. I hope he can find some peace, and a meaningful way to give back to cycling eventually.
I find the sudden enthusiasm for outrightly condeming guys for taking drugs to be somewhat hypocritical. Speeds in racing are much faster than in my days racing in Italy, and the calendar longer with commercial pressures unfair. If one looked at the past records of the TDF, TDI, and the TDS, and all the classics of the past I am sure it would be unrecognisable if you were to ban and relegate all the riders that we still idolise today who probably took "medicine".
My answer? Make the 3 Tours 2 weeks instead of 3, it was formulated nearly 100 yrs ago. You could do the same with other races and they would provide more exciting racing. Modern cycling has become boring what with electronic aids and development, i.e. whenver you turn on the TV you can forecast that there will be a breakaway that will probably be caught ,and if not possible, the pelotin will virtually give up.
that is true but depression, if indeed it was depression, has an effect on the person mind so they do no think straight or pay attention to details such as communicating the medications they take to UCI. I hope they investigated the case in a sensible way otherwaise it might have a dangerous effect on hamilton.
If they didn't give him a ban think how many cyclists would be blaming their positive tests on their "depression".
It's not tricky judgement or cruel - this guy was caught using a banned substance, simple as that. If an athlete has an illness that requires medication on the banned list they sould inform the anti doping agency in advance and not use it as an excuse in after testing +ve. All pro's know the system.
By 8 years they are effectively skipping through the generation that knows he was a liar so that USA Cycling can take him back in as some sort of coach on a US Continental Pro Squad touting his "achievements". A favor from someone he did a favor for earlier in his career.
they're all doping (except for a tiny few) it's blatantly obvious - how else could they do the miles they do with such little reovery time between rides!
Yes it's tricky to call judgement- we've heard cases of cyclists' asthma inhalers containing banned traces, a certain skin moisturer too and even the cyclist in 2004 who ate sweets given by his grandmother that contained traces of some banned drug.
'
What we don't know is whether the amount of DHEA in Hamilton could be attributed to the anti-depressant or whether that was just a mask to deliberate cheating.
'
Takes years to build a reputation and seconds to ruin it.
walk a mile in his shoes before you make judgment. If he was suffering from depression but did not take a prescribed medication, you are just as wise about the ingredients as he obviously was.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account