Hamilton handed eight-year ban

Eurosport - Wed, 17 Jun 08:31:00 2009

American Tyler Hamilton has been given an eight-year ban by the United States Anti-Doping Agency after testing positive for a prohibited substance for a second time.

CYCLING 2007 Tinkoff Tyler Hamilton - 0

The 38-year-old, who captured the gold medal in the individual time trial at the 2004 Athens Olympics before slipping into a series of doping scandals, had already announced his retirement from the sport in April.

"In the sport of cycling, eight years ineligibility for a 38-year-old athlete is effectively a lifetime ban, and an assurance that he is penalised for what would have been the remainder of his competitive cycling career," USADA chief executive officer Travis Tygart said.

Hamilton acknowledged in April that he had tested positive for the steroid DHEA (Dehydroepiandrosterone) during an out-of-competition test on Feb. 9 while he was training for the Tour of California.

The American said he was battling depression and admitted taking an over-the-counter homeopathic anti-depressant containing DHEA.

Hamilton's Olympic victory was tarnished by doping allegations. Later that year he was suspended after testing positive for blood doping at the 2004 Tour of Spain.

Reuters

Comment 5 - 24 of 24

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. Depression - more like cold turkey.

    From John, on Sun 21 Jun 7:34PM
  2. His depression was probably brought on by his­ underlying feelings of guilt knowing that he was a­ cheat & a liar & knowing that his many fans (me­ included) thought he was an honest clean rider.

    From Bikefan, on Thu 18 Jun 6:47AM
  3. 8 years is too much no?

    From Ferenc, on Thu 18 Jun 6:07AM
  4. Let's not forget that doping or no doping, the man­ still came in 5th in the TDF with a broken collar bone.­ Doping aside, that takes guts.

    From Samuel, on Thu 18 Jun 2:46AM
  5. Blah Blah Blah he already retired USADA snooze you­ lose.

    From Tasus, on Thu 18 Jun 1:30AM
  6. too little too late, if they had given him an 8 year­ ban 5 years ago we wouldn't have to tolerate­ reading about this @#$% now

    From colesaunders502, on Thu 18 Jun 12:02AM
  7. and this is "news" because? We just cannot­ seem to stop glorifying these @$$holes with our­ attention, (me included)

    From David, on Wed 17 Jun 6:09PM
  8. c'mon guys... he's lying... AGAIN!! stop being­ such suckers for the BS!

    if he was legit depressed­ and wanted meds for it he could have gone to a doctor­ at any drop-in clinic and got meds and the UCI would­ have not banned him... he might have even got meds that­ didn't contain any banned substance.

    he has some­ of the stupidest, nonsensical excuses for using dope...­ this one makes about as much sense as the vanishing­ twin excuse from the last time around..

    as P.T Barnum­ said... there's a sucker born every minute... and­ it seems a lot of them frequent this board.

    From tmartine, on Wed 17 Jun 4:30PM
  9. @dellortodavide - c'mon, making the racing shorter­ does nothing to reduce cheating, shorter races are just­ ridden faster.. and people will still dope.

    do people­ take dope for the shortest events... 60m, 100m in track­ and field.. HELL YES!! some of the biggest­ violators... this distance, number of days changes­ nothing.

    From tmartine, on Wed 17 Jun 4:21PM
  10. it is known that when a rider is sick and the Docter­ can justify given him a medication that contain banned­ substance that the Rider wil NOT be banned and will be­ allowd to take his medication....the think is that­ Hamilton could not and can not justify taking what he­ call medication against depression...in fact there is a­ lot of medications against depression that not contain­ any banned subctance.
    to me he is a disgrace to cylcing­ trying to aproche cylinig supporters as riduculous­ peoples..h's A sample tested positif in olympic­ gams but he have the honor to keep the medal..maybe­ this is the reason why he become depressif!!

    From Ra, on Wed 17 Jun 3:26PM
  11. He should never be banned. It was his twin what done­ it!

    From keir_williams, on Wed 17 Jun 3:22PM
  12. I've always liked Tyler, and I'm sad to see his­ career come to an ignominious end. I don't like the­ fact that cyclists feel they need and/or want to dope­ to be competitive, but it's just human nature. I­ hope he can find some peace, and a meaningful way to­ give back to cycling eventually.

    From Jerry, on Wed 17 Jun 2:30PM
  13. I find the sudden enthusiasm for outrightly condeming­ guys for taking drugs to be somewhat hypocritical.­ Speeds in racing are much faster than in my days racing­ in Italy, and the calendar longer with commercial­ pressures unfair. If one looked at the past records of­ the TDF, TDI, and the TDS, and all the classics of the­ past I am sure it would be unrecognisable if you were­ to ban and relegate all the riders that we still­ idolise today who probably took­ "medicine".
    My answer? Make the 3 Tours 2­ weeks instead of 3, it was formulated nearly 100 yrs­ ago. You could do the same with other races and they­ would provide more exciting racing. Modern cycling has­ become boring what with electronic aids and­ development, i.e. whenver you turn on the TV you can­ forecast that there will be a breakaway that will­ probably be caught ,and if not possible, the pelotin­ will virtually give up.

    From dellortodavide, on Wed 17 Jun 2:22PM
  14. that is true but depression, if indeed it was­ depression, has an effect on the person mind so they do­ no think straight or pay attention to details such as­ communicating the medications they take to UCI. I hope­ they investigated the case in a sensible way otherwaise­ it might have a dangerous effect on hamilton.

    From alexmn85, on Wed 17 Jun 1:49PM
  15. If they didn't give him a ban think how many­ cyclists would be blaming their positive tests on their­ "depression".

    From loriblack18, on Wed 17 Jun 1:33PM
  16. It's not tricky judgement or cruel - this guy was­ caught using a banned substance, simple as that. If an­ athlete has an illness that requires medication on the­ banned list they sould inform the anti doping agency in­ advance and not use it as an excuse in after testing­ +ve. All pro's know the system.

    From John, on Wed 17 Jun 1:14PM
  17. By 8 years they are effectively skipping through the­ generation that knows he was a liar so that USA Cycling­ can take him back in as some sort of coach on a US­ Continental Pro Squad touting his­ "achievements". A favor from someone he did a­ favor for earlier in his career.

    From Worldwide, on Wed 17 Jun 11:32AM
  18. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    they're all doping (except for a tiny few) it's­ blatantly obvious - how else could they do the miles­ they do with such little reovery time between rides!

    From Andre C, on Wed 17 Jun 11:11AM
  19. Yes it's tricky to call judgement- we've heard­ cases of cyclists' asthma inhalers containing­ banned traces, a certain skin moisturer too and even­ the cyclist in 2004 who ate sweets given by his­ grandmother that contained traces of some banned­ drug.
    '
    What we don't know is whether the­ amount of DHEA in Hamilton could be attributed to the­ anti-depressant or whether that was just a mask to­ deliberate cheating.
    '
    Takes years to build a­ reputation and seconds to ruin it.

    From p, on Wed 17 Jun 10:57AM
  20. walk a mile in his shoes before you make judgment. If­ he was suffering from depression but did not take a­ prescribed medication, you are just as wise about the­ ingredients as he obviously was.

    From chrystal_rainbow, on Wed 17 Jun 9:58AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account