Eurosport - Thu, 17 Sep 07:42:00 2009
Russian Nadia Petrova, stung by US teenager Melanie Oudin in the fourth round in New York, continued her rebound by reaching the quarter-finals of in Quebec.
Petrova, the top seed and defending champion, beat Madison Brengle 6-3 6-2 in 69 minutes, belting 10 aces past the 19-year-old American in their second-round clash.
It was the second quick win in as many days for Petrova, who steamrolled American Carly Gullickson 6-2 6-0 in the first round on Tuesday.
In the quarter-finals Petrova will face fifth-seeded Hungarian Melinda Czink, a 6-4 6-3 winner over France's Severine Bremond Beltrame.
Russia's Alla Kudryavtseva upset sixth-seeded American Jill Craybas 7-5 6-2 and awaits the winner of Thursday's match between third-seeded home hope Aleksandra Wozniak and Russia Regina Kulikova.
Eighth-seeded German Julia Goerges punched her quarter-final ticket at the expense of another Canadian, downing wild card Rebecca Marino 6-2 6-3.
Thursday's second-round matches will also include last year's runner-up, Bethanie Mattek-Sands, taking on fellow American Vania King.
Comment 1 - 4 of 4
to #2 - Where is Serena you ask? Are you freaking serious man? Did you even look at the damn draw? Petrova, the 12th ranked woman in the world, is the #1 seed. The next highest ranked woman in the draw, Aleksandra Wozniak, is ranked 35th in the world. And after her, the next highest ranked women in the tourney are Safarova and Czink, ranked 50 and 52 in the world, respectively. And after these two, the rest of the women are either outside the top 100 in the world, or BARELY inside of it.
Your question should not be where is Serena. It should be where are ANY of the top women in the game. None of them are playing in the tournament. So why should Serena? I bet Serena was like, "why would I play this tournament? there is absolutely no competition here." Do you think she'd play it for money? hahhaaha yeah right...she doesn't need money. lol why would they bother playing in a tournament that was a tier III tourney. LOLOL.
Serena doesn't need the points. ::giggle:: The notion that Serena needs the points is laughable. If anyone needs them, it's Safina. It's only a matter of time before Serena catches up and re-claims her rightful ranking. I'm surprised she hasn't already, but the fact that Safina plays every damn tournament she can (and she often does so strategically, playing the ones where the best players are not, so as to give herself a better chance of winning and therefore earning more ranking points) and had a very good season last season are the primary reasons. However, if she keeps choking and losing to these no-name players, Serena will be back on top even sooner. OHHHH and if Serena had not lost her temper at the US Open, she may have been able to come back and beat Clijsters and win yet ANOTHER US Open title. This is very plausible. She has come back from far worse deficits before. Just think, if she HAD done that, she would be #1 as of this very moment, if I'm not mistaken.
Next time t
Why do you think, comment No 2, that Serena needs the points more?
And how retarded are you to ask where Serena is at...dude, if you are a racist with no shame, you shouldn't expose yourself on a network like this. Go look for where skinheads bombard with hatred and senseless comments.
Gosh how much I hate those wicked people
So where's Serena attaha. She needs the points more than Safina does.
Russian Stallion on a lone mission, The rest are rsting. Safina should be here
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account