Eurosport - Mon, 18 May 15:57:00 2009
Formula One's insurgent teams will be back in deep conference early this week, as the battle over a budget-capped future continues.
F1 more cynical participants have long joked that the letters FIA really stand for Ferrari International Assistance rather than International Automobile Federation.
There have been moments in the past 60 years, and particularly during the recent Michael Schumacher era, when rivals have felt the governing body was too close to the Italian glamour team.
Not now, though, with Ferrari and FIA heading for the courtroom over the 2010 regulations and the champions threatening to quit the sport.
FIAT-owned Ferrari will seek an injunction in a Paris court on Tuesday to try to stop the FIA from introducing a £40 million ($60.82 million) budget cap.
"For us it (Formula One) is very important, it's our life," said Ferrari boss Stefano Domenicali last week. "We want to fight in order to make sure that we will be in the championship in the right way."
Even if Ferrari win the first round, the fight will not be over. The FIA has said it will appeal, a move sure to keep the pot bubbling through the weekend's showcase Monaco Grand Prix and beyond.
"I once said that they were the most important team and that got immediately interpreted as that meant that we gave them special treatment, which we don't and never have," FIA president Max Mosley said after meeting the teams in London on Friday.
"They race under the same rules as everybody else.
"From a public point of view, they are the most important team and that's reflected in the fact that they get the most money from their deal with (Formula One's commercial supremo) Bernie (Ecclestone)," he added.
"But the idea that they are indispensable is nonsense."
Ferrari, the only team to have competed in every championship since the first in 1950 as well as the most successful, and the FIA have been at loggerheads since the budget cap was first raised.
So to have Ecclestone, who on Friday branded the team 'idiots' for pursuing the legal action, and Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo.
The two men had a sharp exchange last year, with Montezemolo saying that Formula One did not need a dictator, and should be run instead in a normal, transparent manner with the teams getting a far bigger share of the revenues.
Ecclestone's reply was that Ferrari already received about $80 million more than anyone else in recognition of their special contribution to the sport.
"The only thing he has not mentioned is the extra money Ferrari get above all the other teams and all the extra things Ferrari have had for years - the 'general help' they are considered to have had in Formula One," he added.
Montezemolo, in a letter to Mosley last month expressing concern about the rules, alluded to Ferrari's special position when he complained that their "guaranteed rights" had not been respected by the FIA.
Four years ago, Ferrari broke ranks with other manufacturers planning a rival grand prix series and agreed to commit to the FIA's Formula One championship until the end of 2012.
"In 2005 we signed an exchange of letters with them saying that their rights and privileges under the Concorde Agreement would continue until 2012, whether or not we signed a new one," said Mosley.
"They were in a position where they had whatever they had under the old 1998 Concorde agreement in return for being loyal."
He maintained, however, that Ferrari had effectively forfeited their right to veto changes to the technical rules by forming the Formula One Teams' Association, chaired by Montezemolo, last season.
"It would be our contention that they walked away from this agreement some time ago," said Mosley.
"Essentially, they walked away by forming FOTA. They were always supposed to be loyal to the FIA, work with us and co-operate.
"Enzo Ferrari traditionally would sit in the middle between the British teams and the governing body and he'd move one way or the other according to his interest."
Comment 110 - 129 of 129
Roberta F: Yes I did, and funny you should say that.
111 - barry.lowers - The problem appear to be that the teams don't think that they need to save as much money as Mad Max and Bernie want them to. The dinamic duo (not) want more teams at the races but most everyone else is afraid of mobile raod blocks.
If they can't afford to compete they should stay away.
Reefgirl, did you read the article above? You speak like Mystic Mag.
6.The way I saw it yesterday is that, In Max's mind this HAS to work, he's put so much faith and energy into this that it would be deeply humiliating if it fails. But others (Ferrari, Red Bull, et al) feel that there is deception and deals being done in the shadows creating illusions. But there is opitimism on both sides that a deal can be done to sort this out in a way that will benefit both sides but discontent and nonchalence on both sides will hamper the process, both sides feel that they are bigger than the other and that public opinion is on their side. A logical and balanced deal will be needed in the end because the court's will rule in favour of the right cause.
Racism, Homophobia, sexism, paranoia, righteous indignation, mulitple personalities and rampant dyslexia. This thread is turning into an episode of Eastenders, or Jerry Springer
Well i keep putting Donkeys posts on to a translation site but it just keeps coming back with (talking sh i t ):-)))
I know that Francis' vocab is not hot but I can make out what he is saying and his #109 does make sense if you look into it more.
Thank you, adrian.
Well at current levels of spending Toyota & Renault are going to quit at the end of the season, so all those jobs will be lost anyway. Ther chances are that BMW will go soon as well, so further jobs lost. If the budgets are brought under control & new teams come in maybe Toyota & Renault will stay & there will be a net gain in employment.
Thats not so unreal,is it?
mr mga ther aint no one hear that dont undar stan wat i rigt . its jus complete morons like you tha cant comprimend wats hapinin.
why dont ya go cuddle up with tha gay owan ya geerbox
owen, I don't think anybody that speak that way has a point worth to express in proper English.
HeHeHeHe or should i say Heehaw Heehaw Heehaw look at stupid Donkey trying to get a point across but no one can understand it:-))
Get back to riding Dan Dan the cavity filling man (space is between his ears):-))))
No not the only reason,the show must go on with Ferrari and McLaren(and Brawn too if they can keep it up).Actually jobs do matter a lot to me Roberta.
harmione, we'll see about that.
Francis if you want to make it simple so people understand why don't you start writing in English instaed of donkeyspeak.
The whole thing isn't just about Ferarri; there are also Renault, Red Bull etc.. If you take away most of the big names and replace them with a budget capped race series you will lose most of the large corperate sponsors and Bernie E would not be a happy bunny.
I do not think that he will let that happen.
oh ya wizzo . i gus figur out the new 40 millin f1 . ya bild tha f1 kit in yer gerage at home . ya tak tha spec engine an tha spec body an spec suspesion an spec brakes an spec ecu an spec kars. than ya go to tha trak an race with tha othar spec cars . later on in tha day when ya go home ya can watch it on tha you tube caus yer friends did sum racordin fer ya . evan betar than f1 caus ther is no adverts.
wizzo, I can't believe that your real and only reason against the cap is the welfare of the mechanics and their families, come on!
At the end of the day the teams have to save money or there will be no more F1 BUT FIA have tried to use the big stick again and it is about time that they learn the hard way the fans go to see F1 cars and teams not two old men that want to be bigger than the sport it is time that FIA was managed by some one with more sense all the time that we the fans are paying £75 just to see F1 why do they care
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account