Eurosport - Sun, 19 Jul 16:31:00 2009
Russia's Sergei Ivanov (Katusha) won stage 14 of the Tour de France on a day when American George Hincpaie came within five seconds of the yellow jersey.
On a day for veterans, 34-year-old Ivanov continued his fine season with a powerful solo win after breaking clear from his fellow escapees with 10 kilometres of the 199km stage left to ride.
It was the Russia's second Tour stage victory and added to Ivanov's win in the Amstel Gold spring classic earlier this year.
Team Columbia Highroad's Hincapie, riding his 14th Tour at the age of 36, finished in the chasing group 16 seconds down on the Russian but more than five minutes ahead of the peloton, which included race leader Rinaldo Nocentini.
Both Ivanov and Hincapie were part of a 12-man breakaway which formed early on in the 199km stage from Colmar to Besancon.
With the break building up a gap of nine minutes at one point it became clear that the yellow jersey of Ag2r's Nocentini was under threat on the eve of the race hitting its decisive Alpine section.
Hincapie, who was in 28th position five minutes 25 seconds down going into Saturday's stage, was riding as virtual leader of the race for a significant portion of the day.
But the American was denied the second yellow jersey of his career after the peloton edged across the line 5:36 down on stage winner Ivanov.
Ironically, it was Hincapie's Team Columbia Highroad team-mate Mark Cavendish who was forced to up the tempo of the bunch in the closing moments as the Manxman made a bid to gain valuable points in the race for the green jersey.
Cavendish finished 13th on the day, one place ahead of green jersey holder Thor Hushovd - but was susbequently deducted his points after race officials judged him to have boxed the Norwegian too close to the barriers. Click the link beneath the picture for full details on the story.
Hincapie is now second in the overall standings, one second ahead of Spain's Alberto Contador (Astana) and three seconds ahead of his friend Lance Armstrong (Astana).
Frenchman Christophe Le Mevel (Francaise des Jeux), who was also involved in the breakaway, moved ahead of Britain's Bradley Wiggins to take fifth place, 43 seconds behind Nocentini. Wiggins, still set for the best Tour finish of his career, is three seconds further back in sixth.
Ireland's Nicolas Roche (Ag2r) took second place in the stage which was marred by news of the death of a female supporter who was hit by a policeman's motorbike.
The Tour continues on Sunday with the 207km stage from Pontarlier to the ski resort of Verbier, the race's second summit finish.
Although there are no out-of-category climbs on the agenda, stage 15 is expected to see a major shake up in the overall standings as the main contenders finally get a chance to do battle.
Comment 47 - 66 of 66
Scotl_99, you've done a very good explaining of the stategies involved and I understand better now. I know that the analogy with golfing doesn't stand but in was in response to a previous comment about sportsmanship. I understand when on one-on-one whoever's sealed the Tour steps aside for the other guy to take the glory for a day. On stage 13 though I was under the impression that Columbia had asked (or was silently expected) that a few teams (not two riders, but 20 plus) slow down enough to calculate that their rider in front,GH, gets the yellow even if everybody is expecting him to lose it the next day! Why Garmin's and AG2r acceleration was not sportsmanship that I don't understand. At least you explained that strategically was a lot of effort. What they got out of it no one knows. On a simpler note I enjoyed yesterday's last 5 km when at last everybody raced for themselves.
In regards to post number 67. Ivanov did run a brilliant stage. His escape at the end was a thing of beauty. No one should suggest that he shouldn't have competed and that it wasn't a deserving victory. This isn't about Ivanov, Roche or anyone else in the breakaway.
Garmin should be working to get their two top ten riders into the best possible position in the GC. Again, though, you have to look at the tactics used in terms of the overall strategy. Neither Wiggins or Vandevelde was in position to gain time yesterday. While it could be argued that it might be tougher to tack time back from Columbia than AG2RR, this point is rather moot as Nocentini won't be in yellow by the end of Tuesday's stage and AG2RR has been shaky the last couple of days. Hincapie also won't be able to stay with the top GC contenders through the time trial stage. Garmin going to the front and riding tempo seems like an awful lot of effort for very little reward.
I haven't seen anyone decry what happened yesterday as an injustice. It just didn't make strategic sense. Cycling is a sport of alliances. Columbia and Hincapie will remember this and sometime when Garmin needs help with something, it won't be available from them.
The Tiger Woods analogy doesn't fit either. Golf as a competition is a four day event. No prizes exist for having the best score after the first day and none exist for other skills. The Open Championship doesn't have a best putter award or a longest drive award. Everything is focused on one goal. The Tour de France has four separate overall competitions and 22 separate races. The goals, focus and motivations of the riders varies greatly. Success is defined many ways in a stage cycling race. In golf, success is defined only by having the lowest score after four rounds.
I get it. Garmin with two riders in top 10 are short sighted morons for helping AGr2 in their "weak efforts" to keep yellow. Perhaps they both should have rolled over to the american cos he's nearing the end of career. Is it all about americans? How about GH in the days of LA always being the chaser? Other people have lost much more than GH for even a fraction of second. What's all this noise about "injustice" for not letting him getting the yellow just for one day? If he wanted it so bad he could have pushed a bit more instead of whining. How about "well done Ivanov"! Their beloved T.Woods wouldn't gift the Open to Garcia who's missed one by a single shot and may not get another chance, would he? In any other sport I don't hear so much noise for not calculating things enough to "gift" the glory to someone.
Bryan O is correct about the rules of sportsmanship in cycling. There is a degree of honor that is an expected part of the sport. It is quite common for someone to stop and wait for a rival after a crash. Armstrong did this for Ullrich. Ullrich got criticized for not doing a better job of this in 2003 when Armstrong crashed. I have seen the pace of the peloton slowed when a veteran rider was in danger of being disqualified in an attempt to allow them to continue the Tour, (I believe it was for Voight....he wasn't able to finish the stage..this was four or five years ago). Lemond did allow Hinault to cross first at Alp d'Huez. The other examples Bryan O cited were also on target. These things are more a matter of priority though than match fixing. Lemond had effectively wrapped up the tour so winning Alp d'Huez wasn't that important to him. Same with Armstrong with regards to Pantani on Ventoux. This isn't match fixing so much as being focused on a main priority and allowing others to be recognized for a good day.
In regards to Garmin on Saturday, the rationale given for them to be on the front was rather tepid and somewhat flimsy, (they were worried about a break in the peloton...). A team needs to follow a necessary strategy to win. However, not allowing Hincapie to get yellow really didn't have much to do with that for Garmin. Wiggins and Vandevelde would have faced essentially the same time deficits. Again, it is a matter of priority. Did Garmin's tactics truly fit their priorities as a team in regards to GC or the green jersey?
Ultimately, people are right that Hincapie shouldn't be given anything. In truth, he wasn't. Hincapie positioned himself well and more or less kept the break organized for a long period of time. No dishonor exists in coming up short. Getting the yellow would have been a fitting honor for his efforts. He wouldn't have held for more than a couple of days. He may have it after today.
My comment will seem naive to a lot of people but I like to follow the Tour though I understand little about cycling. Even less now! On a day when someone should be congratulated for coming first after 200km, this is called a disgrace for cycling because people didn't calculate well enough for GH in yellow or win the stage!? On the next stage could we please step aside and give yellow to BW or whoever? Just for a taste, then real contenders can have it back on the last day or something. It's not tough enough for an attack apparently even today. It seems more to be about politics, favours, calculations, then the approar that one day there were no radios to rely on. Every stage seems to be predicted, bunch sprint, wake me up on the last km to watch 2mins excitement; 20km flat to finish from a cat1 climb, no one will attack, there's no point. I thought it was supposed to be a race, why do people seem so peeved about GH, he's been on this Tour long enough to have done the same perhaps.
The last paragraph of my post got cut off towards the end. I wanted to finish it up properly:
While Hincapie is an all around cyclist, it is doubtful that his climbing or time trialing skills would be enough to keep him in yellow if he'd taken the yellow jersey today. It would not surprise me to see him in yellow after tomorrow. The Alps will open up the racing, but my guess is that the GC contenders will mostly end up riding together. Evans may try to go tomorrow, but I have a feeling that unless Silence Lotto puts up an extraordinary team performance he will be pulled back in. Neither Armstrong or Contador really will have impetus to attack tomorrow. They simply can wait for Nocentini to fade. Sastre is also likely to wait. Anything is possible, but I would not be surprised to see Hincapie one second ahead of Contador after tomorrow's stage. Contador will likely have the yellow jersey after the time trial on Thursday. Anything could happen on the road to Ventoux, but I think Contador is in good position.
Bryan O - In any other sport this would be classed as match fixing!
NO GIFTS! Do you guys even follow cycling? It's called sportsmanship. Alejandro Valverde allowed Sylvester Szmyd to win Mount Ventoux at this year's Dauphine Libere. Armstrong let Pantanni win Ventour. Armstrong let Basso win a stage. Hamilton slowed the attack on Tourmalet when Lance crashed. Lance waited for Ullrich when he crashed. There's a billion other examples of capable racers being given the glory of the day for their sponsors and their pro record.
The Tour is not won in a day. No one views GH as a gc threat. Nearing the end of his career it sure would have been nice if the other American team allowed an American racer to get the yellow and a 2 second mention on ESPN's Sportscenter to promote cycling in the States. But short sighted morons supported AG2r in their weak effort to keep the yellow. LAME. Although their have been admirable breakaway efforts the Tour has been LAME since Andorra. Prudhomme even ruined Tourmalet with 70 km of downhill. If their is no race to the summit at Verbier tomorrow, I will follow the Tour and pro cycling with the same enthusiasm as most Americans and turn it off.
Well surely the best sprinter IS the most consistent finisher. That is what the jersey is all about.
Funny no one mentioned it but Spain's Alberto Contador only won the tour last time he raced because Rassmusen was ban so he won by default?
~~~~~ VERY STRANGE. I just saw him on _____LovingRich * COMe webSite________.Is he Sing-le again?
GOGOLE IT!!you will be surprised!
~He's with a hoT model there.
__
A few thoughts. First off, it is neat to see great classic riders having great stages. Ivanov and Heussler were both quite impressive as was Sorenson. Ideally, a stage race should showcase cyclists of all disciplines. I think that the various stages this past week were set up to do that. Secondly, the race for the polka-dot and green jersey's have been quite competitive. In terms of the green, this has gone back and forth. I think Hushovd has benefitted from his experience and better overall skills. Still, the Champs-Elysees should be quite interesting next Sunday. Pelizotti has done a good job of picking a goal and taking the steps necessary to accomplish it. This contest is far from over, though. The Alps could see someone else rise up and take the polka dots.
Someone said HTC has been looking increasingly fatigued. I agree with that. They have spent lots of time on the front and are bound to be wearing down. I think a bigger factor today, though, was the absence of Hincapie to help organize the sprint for Columbia. Hincapie's experience is vital to Columbia and all of its goals. His breakaway today deprived them of a needed element in the sprint.
While Hincapie is an all around cyclist, it is doubtful that his climbing or time trialing skills would be enough to keep him in yellow if he'd taken the yellow jersey today. It would not surprise me to see him in yellow tomorrow. The Alps will open up the racing, but my guess is that the GC contenders will mostly end up riding together. Evans may try to go tomorrow, but I have a feeling that unless Silence Lotto puts up an extraordinary team performance he will be pulled back in. Neither Armstrong or Contador really will have impetus to attack tomorrow. They simply can wait for Nocentini to fade. Sastre is also likely to wait. Anything is possible, but I would not be surprised to see Hincapie one second ahead of Contador after tomorrow's stage. Contador will likely have the yellow jersey after the time
iancampbell11 - Isn't the aim of this new team to have a British winner of the TDF and or to be based around British talent, thus, the first riders one would look at would be British then one would build a team around those riders. As he has only just started looking, I assume he would only be looking at British riders at this stage.
IT will be an English speaking rider that has the bio passport problem not necessarily a Brit.
Why should Garmin care about Hincapie one way or the other. I agree with comment 51 "no gifts", it really brings no credit to the yellow jersey to hand it round like an old boy's club.
to liz s if you have videoed the finish as you said, please look again and you will see the offence just before moving across and stopping thor you can clearly see cav look round and see him, he then pulls the oldest trick in the sprinters book and has a long look on the left hand side pretending no offence has been comitted !
and by the way the green jersey isnt for the best sprinter it is for the most consistent finisher,
Brailsford let it slip today that one of the riders he approached for his new team had an irregular bio passport. Could this be a British rider? As I imagine he would only be approaching British riders at this stage. I trust that he will be or has informed the UCI/ASO of his findings and when will this information be made public?
I think Cav's behaviour today has been a somewhat disappointing. I noticed that he had an attitude with one of the Soigneurs (but with no sound on the footage) as he got onto the team bus. I suspect it had something to do with Hincapie taking priority over his green jersey. Cav you're a brilliant rider but don't let yourself down, don't blow your cool.
RIDICULOUS HEADLINE EUROSPORT!!
IVANOV DIDN'T DENY HINCAPIE. ACTUALLY HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FRONT GUYS TO GO FASTER AS THEY HAD TO PURSUE HIM FOR STAGE VICTORY.
Armstrong said himself after the 2000 TdF, there are no gift stage wins or yellow jerseys. So why does he now think Hincapie deserves some sort of a gift? If George had won the stage, he'd be in yellow. Simple as that.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account