fagucodonosor I said if you had any pride or dignity­ you would stop posting. That was a rhetorical question­ as obvioulsy you don't so that was why I asked who­ you thought the GOAT was. God you really are stupid­ arn't you? Such a poor grasp of how the English­ language works. LOL what a r.e.t.a.r.d. Still won't­ answer the question will you? What a loser!

Oh and he­ thinks we're ganging up on him? Ha ha ha how weak­ is that! Why don't you go and cry to Mummy­ Fagcodosor. Your nothing on this site. Everyone laughs­ at you! You know nothing about Tennis and your just a­ sad loner with no life. Is that why you hate Federer?­ because you sent him a Gay love letter and he­ didn't reply back? Oh of course it all makes sense­ now!

Btw, I love how you little wusses gang up on me like a­ group of sixth graders on a ninth grader. It shows the­ relative strengths of our positions really.

"­ If he had any pride or dignity he would stop­­ embarassing himself and stop posting.

By the way­­ Fagucodonosor since you could not answer any of­­ Checkerboards points why don't you say who you­­ think is the Goat then??"

He tells me to stop­ posting, and then begs me for an answer. Make up your­ mind, tard.

LOL nicely done Checkerboard!! the word ownage­ dosen't do justice to how much you pawned this­ little b.i.t.ch! Of course Nabucodonosor like most­ trolls knows little to nothing about the subject he­ constantly comments on. Your best not wasting your time­ as a brick wall will provide far more articulate and­ intelligent feedback then fagucodonosor here. Your too­ good for him as he has demonstrated in his responses.­ If he had any pride or dignity he would stop­ embarassing himself and stop posting.

By the way­ Fagucodonosor since you could not answer any of­ Checkerboards points why don't you say who you­ think is the Goat then??

Im the real Nabtard folks. SUCK ON IT­ hahahahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHA

Nabucodonosor I have done something rare here because I­ have actually OVERESTIMATED your Intelligence. It would­ not suprise me if you did actually believe Krajicek was­ as good as Sampras. Notice you couldn't counter any­ points I made? Oh and here is something for you to­ learn today. Consistency is the key to EVERYTHING in­ sport. You can't win the league in football if your­ not consistent can you? It's not a minor element­ that Federer has. Maybe your just some punk child­ playing on his mommys computer. That would explain­ alot. A child with no friends either given how often­ you comment on Eurosport Tennis storys.

To­ aeronick2000, your wrong Agassi was the first to Win­ Grand slams on all surfaces, Grass, Clay and Hard­ court. In Laver's day there was only two different­ surfaces. Also they did not have to play 7 best of 5­ matchs to win a slam plus there was a hell of alot less­ players on tour in his day. Interesting point John­ McEnroe made at Wimbledon this year, he said that the­ 100th ranked player today would probabley be around the­ top 50 10-15 years ago. Says something for the strength­ in depth of Tennis today compared to eras gone by.

Hey Nab you gone all red and steamy? I recommend a­ nice, cool, ice-bath, son!

@ checkerboard: That was single-handed the biggest­ ownage in eurosport blog history. Nabucodinosaur will­ be evading this blog for a few days probably.

Lol @ checkerwhore. It wouldn't be a Fedtard if it­ wouldn't go into hysterical fits every time the­ legitimacy of the "messiah" was questioned.­ Why can't you Fedtards just accept that you're­ stupid and others have better taste? I mean how hard­ can that be?

And btw, just to piss you off a little­ more, Kraijcek, at his best, was about as good at­ Sampras, only a lot less consistent. Wrap your little­ brain around that.

As for the best player in history,­ that's easy. The best player ever is Dominik­ Hrbaty. Common knowledge for the connoisseurs of this­ sport, really.

Preach on checkerboard5000, perfectly said. Although,­ two things I disagree with. Even as big a fan of­ Federer I am, wouldn't go as far as saying that­ Federer is better than Rodney Laver. Its a unique­ acheivement winning all four slams in a year. It­ implies a supreme ability above all on all surfaces, it­ also takes focus and calm of an ice-cool character. You­ find those people once every half a century, and in­ men's tennis there are a whole lot of hungry dudes.­ I doubt we'll find a grand slammer in our lifetime­ in men's tennis. But if Fed does, that will take to­ the brink of retirement on 20 slams.
Put it this way,­ Federer is better than Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Del­ P. But in order to do the grand slam, he'll have to­ beat every single one of them anytime he meets them in­ a slam plus a whole lot of potential banana skins like­ Verdasco, Tsonga, Haas, Soderling, Gonzalez. Thats the­ challenge ahead of him if he wants 'the mother of­ all acheivements'. Now tell me, even with a man of­ Federer's talents, How on earth is he going to­ that?
Second disagreement cross-eyed inbred with­ siblings as his biological parents?? Even for someone­ as stupid as Nabucodonosor, thats a bit too harsh!

Nabucodonosor, I usually ignore filth which is beneath­ me but your last comment needs to be dealt with as­ people need to see how your really just a cross eyed­ jealous inbred who is the product of a brother + sister­ relationship.

You say Federer is consistent? Er does­ it not take take supreme skill to be THAT consistent??­ Form is temporary and class is permanent. 4 Grand slam­ finals this year? How many times has Federer done that­ now and how many people in HISTORY have ever done that?­ NOT the people you have mentioned.

You say there is­ not much difference netween him and Nadal, Murray,­ Djokovic etc. Well Krajicek has a 5-4 winning record­ over a PRIME Pete Sampras. When you saw them play­ Sampras didn't seem that much better but who had­ the 14 slams to Krajiceks 1? Thats right you loser of­ course Pete was better. Same that Hewitt had a 5-4­ record over Pete including 2-1 on grass not to mention­ when he anihalated Sampras at the U.S open final. Again­ no sane person thinks Hewitt was a better player then­ Sampras (except maybe you)

You analysis of Federers­ game is laughible. Typical armchair idiot who knows­ little about the technical side of Tennis. You have no­ idea of the mechanics of the game of Tennis if you­ seriously believe what you wrote.

Tell me then who you­ think is the greatest and I will destroy that view with­ a few simple facts. By the way you do know Philipousis,­ Henman.Safin and Agassi all said Federer was alot­ tougher to play against then Sampras and that he was­ the better player? Also Sampras was rubbish on clay and­ basically blasted his opponents off the court with his­ serve and huge volley? Once it was slowed down on clay­ he was barely a top 20 player. Funny how Roger could­ play on ALL surfaces. Nabucodonosor you really are a­ fraud and if you dare talk about Laver being the best­ then I will humliate you on that front as well. Loser­ get a life

Nabucodonosor, I usually ignore filth which is beneath­ me but your last comment needs to be dealt with as­ people need to see how your really just a cross eyed­ jealous inbred who is the product of a brother + sister­ relationship.

You say Federer is consistent? Er does­ it not take take supreme skill to be THAT consistent??­ Form is temporary and class is permanent. 4 Grand slam­ finals this year? How many times has Federer done that­ now and how many people in HISTORY have ever done that?­ NOT the people you have mentioned.

You say there is­ not much difference netween him and Nadal, Murray,­ Djokovic etc. Well Krajicek has a 5-4 winning record­ over a PRIME Pete Sampras. When you saw them play­ Sampras didn't seem that much better but who had­ the 14 slams to Krajiceks 1? Thats right you loser of­ course Pete was better. Same that Hewitt had a 5-4­ record over Pete including 2-1 on grass not to mention­ when he anihalated Sampras at the U.S open final. Again­ no sane person thinks Hewitt was a better player then­ Sampras (except maybe you)

You analysis of Federers­ game is laughible. Typical armchair idiot who knows­ little about the technical side of Tennis. You have no­ idea of the mechanics of the game of Tennis if you­ seriously believe what you wrote.

Tell me then who you­ think is the greatest and I will destroy that view with­ a few simple facts. By the way you do know Philipousis,­ Henman.Safin and Agassi all said Federer was alot­ tougher to play against then Sampras and that he was­ the better player? Also Sampras was rubbish on clay and­ basically blasted his opponents off the court with his­ serve and huge volley? Once it was slowed down on clay­ he was barely a top 20 player. Funny how Roger could­ play on ALL surfaces. Nabucodonosor you really are a­ fraud and if you dare talk about Laver being the best­ then I will humliate you on that front as well. Loser­ get a life

Based on current form, I would say Nole. But form­ eventually ends (as Murray at US Open)
Roger's­ achievements speak for him so he should not be­ discarded. Some say 22 yr old Murray is yet to win a­ slam. So what? Look up Alex Corretja (incidentally one­ of Murray's coaches) in '98 and David­ Nalbandian in '05.
As for Nadal being only to one­ final since May? Same identical case for Nole last year­ !
Take a chill pill guys, everyone has a shot

I think Federer can make it, those guys are just plain­ lucky !

Sjhill96, a Djokovic-Nadal final, well i doubt very­ hard if thats possible, i mean he plays soderling first­ match and soderling is a indoor-hardcourt player, dont­ forget he stunned nadal on his FAVOURITE surface, so i­ think everything is in advantage for soderling, and if­ you look at his next opponent: davydenko, nadal has­ still a record against him on CLAY, and all those­ meetings davydenko has won are all on hardcourts, and­ this court seem to be very fast, and at least djokovic,­ in the last two meetings on hardcourt djokovic simply­ crushed him, so lots of work to do for nadal. Im saying­ this without the bad conditions of federer and the­ losses is because its almost impossible to be a­ djoko-nadal final, id rather say a delpo-djoko final or­ delpo soderling ...

Hehe Nabucodonosor, well i agree with you for the first­ time, finally some nice words, but what i still have­ not heard is that you call him fraud. U have prove he­ has token meth also?? or is it the challenge thing he­ complained about? :)

THE AGASSI BOOK HAS QUITE A FEW FANTASY DREAMS TO FILL­ THE PAGES

WELL KATY 16
IN AGASSI RECENT COMMENTS --- HE READILY­ ADMITTED HE CHEATED
WITH HIS ILLEGAL DRUG TAKING
AND­ WAS WILLING TO REFUND SOME TO SAMPRAS