Eurosport - Sat, 20 Dec 23:16:00 2008
Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has hit back at criticism from Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo by detailing how much more money the Italian team receive from the sport than their rivals.
"They know exactly what they get, they are not that stupid, although they are not that bright, either. They get about $80 million (£54m) more," added the Briton.
"When they win the constructors' championship, which they did this year, they got $80 million more than if McLaren had won it."
Ferrari are the sport's most glamorous and successful team and the only ones still in Formula One who were also present at the outset of the world championship in 1950.
It has never been a secret that the Maranello team receive a greater share of the sport's revenues in recognition of their special importance but a figure has not previously been revealed.
Ecclestone's remarks followed comments by Di Montezemolo in which the Italian said Formula One was not run in a normal, transparent manner, did not need a dictator and that teams should get more of the revenues.
"The only thing he has not mentioned is the extra money Ferrari get above all the other teams and all the extra things Ferrari have had for years - the `general help' they are considered to have had in Formula One," said Ecclestone.
The Briton added that Ferrari benefited from agreeing a new deal with him after breaking ranks with the other manufacturers in 2003 when they were threatening a breakaway series.
"They were the only team that broke ranks with the other manufacturers - why did they break ranks?" he said. "That's where the $80 million comes in."
Ecclestone suggested Ferrari might like to share some of the money with the other teams rather than seeking more from him.
"What he (Montezemolo) should do, rather than asking for money, with all the extra money Ferrari gets, he should share all that amongst the teams," he said.
A Ferrari spokesman had no comment on Ecclestone's remarks.
"However, the topic of revenue is of the highest importance at this particular time in Formula One," he added.
Montezemolo also heads the Formula One Teams Association who have agreed a package of cost-cutting measures with the governing FIA to stabilise the sport in the face of the credit crunch.
At their last meeting, FOTA and FIA also agreed that they needed to sit down with Ecclestone's Formula One Management "to discuss the earnings of the Formula One teams."
FIA President Max Mosley has suggested that up to 12 teams should get at least $50 million each from the commercial rights holder to ensure full grids and a healthy championship.
Comment 614 - 633 of 693
Ginger I posted something very similar this morning.
I fist posted it some weeks ago and nearly got lynched for it!
Chris T,
totally agree with you sir, it's the same with the Honda fuel cell, and the McLaren spy gate, or branded cheats, yet Ferraris, flexing wing and flexing floor, nothing. Who's the cheat?
Chris T,
yet Ferraris, flexing wing and flexing floor, nothing.
Chris T,
totally agree with you sir, it's the same with the Honda fuel cell, and the McLaren spy gate, or branded cheats,
MGA: I wasn't sure if it had run out or not, I only really used it as recogniseable terminology to identify the agreement between FOM and the teams for the distribution of monies among other aspects of the sport, my point was more a suggestion of the FOTA acting as a single negotiating body on behalf of all teams to formulate a single agreement that benefits no individual to the detriment of any other.
Perhaps the economic crisis will be the catalyst needed to bring common sense back to Formula One. The teams may have no other choice that join forces against Bernie and the FIA. Let's hope so.
It was fun discussing these matters with all of you. Have a nice evening.
Chris T: I say the following are all dubious and all benefitted Ferrari.....
1) Ferrari escape disqualification for illegal rear wing.
2) Ferrari escape punishment for illegal floorpan.
3) Rules redefined on "moveable aerodynamic devices" to outlaw Renault's Mass Damper after Ferrari become only team to really struggle to implement it.
4) Rules redefined on "moveable aerodynamic devices" to allow Ferrari to use wheel covers which were not only aerodynamic devices, but also technically moved.
5) Honda penalised when excess fuel could be argued to be ballast as the car would not move without it.
6) "Cool Fuel" issue at Brazil in 2007 which if deemed illegal would have stripped Kimi of his WDC and hadn't it to Lewis.
Now I'm sure there are some I have missed, and unfortunately I can't add balance by arguing the other side (and I actually would have liked to) because I can't think of any decisions in the same ilk that have penalised Ferrari or benefitted their competition.
MGA Pitpass carries the story . The Concorde Agreement has in fact expired although there is a letter of agreement standing
tele996 : I am not horrified by anything that happens in F1 and quite bluntly i don't see why anyone here is either. Does the Carry on Gang mean anything to you ? This is total entertainment and nothing else . What kind of reasonable and respectable business would be caught in such a mess. Constantly i hear the notions of F1 near the end , bad for the sport , etc etc and on the next page i read about all those who are investing in F1 . Right now there appears to be 4 different groups looking at Honda. If as many say F1 is finished , rigged , fixed then why would there be such an interest in Honda . Are these people just plain stupid ? Don't they know there's a recession right around the world? Don't they know only Ferrari gets good deals ? My guess is that they haven't found this forum yet. Hope they don't until they've bought.
I agree with you and do respect your opinion forza and I also agree with ginger gitts opinion that fota is a threat to bernie and the fia, it must be, anything that unifies the teams will be a threat. Bernie and the fia like to divide and rule and fota poses a big problem for them.
At this point I would like to scream about Renault's mass damper. Outlawed after over a season in use. Let Schumacher nearly take the championship from Alonso. Only an unusual breakdown of a Ferrari kept Alonso his title.
Gentlemen: MGA Forza, Slim, Paul, tele
I did enjoy that. I didn't get angry or insulted or removed once! A bit of tension earlier, but I suppose Slim had only read my err less than 100% serious comments.
I liked the bit about bouncing on the sofa with a cup of tea! Brought back memories.
SlimJ,
sorry I have to correct you their, Honda fuel cell, was found guilty by the FIA, on the grounds, that it was theoretically possible, for the car to be underweight. the car was never underweight, and if you remember, Honda's defence was, if the fuel cell was empty, the car would not move. The FIA dismissed that argument, and found them guilty, even though the car was not found to be underweight, and the truth of the matter is, they were a serious threat to Ferrari, just like McLaren was, same result.
Forza, nice to see you again, a reasoned pro-Ferrari stance has been a rarity, so welcome back.
I do think that there needs to be somekind of investigation into the true wordings of this agreement with Ferrari. And once that is done (and any reprimand has been handed out if it is required) ALL Concorde Agreements with ALL teams should be torn up. A new single agreement should then be drawn up between FOM and FOTA, so no single team can ever have the ability to influence the sport in such a way, thus forcing all teams to work together for the good of the sport.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone think this FOTA is a united alliance that actually scares the FIA and Bernie? All teams acting together as one (including Ferrari this time) could make a breakaway series a serious prospect as long as they are all singing from the same hymn sheet, but how much is that scaring people into the latest outbursts against Ferrari? $80million a year to "buy" Ferrari's loyalty and 5 years down the line they are not only now "on the other side" (so to speak) but are apparently the "enemies" new leaders.
It's no secret that Ron Dennis and Max are not exactly on each other's Christmas card list- and haven't been for many, many years.
tele996, I will answer honestly. I admit that many decisions have been made that seem to favor Ferrari. I don't necessarily buy into the conspiracy theory. I do believe, however, that the FIA has some kind of "vendetta" against McLaren, which naturally benefits Ferrari.
I have been watching Formula One long enough to know that things change. Ferrari used to get those same kind of penalties not so long ago. I seem to remember that Williams also suffered the same fate at some time in the past. Unfortunately, the FIA has a long history of inconsistency that leads to all kinds of theories.
MGA
Can we start chucking poo now?
I think they're hiding.
I must say, it is nice to finally have a discussion with varying opinions and no cheap insults. It looks as if the "locos" took a day off.
... and is it the left or right side of you?
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account