Ryder Cup - Jacklin: Faldo did nothing wrong

Eurosport - Mon, 22 Sep 23:54:00 2008

While European Ryder Cup captain Nick Faldo has been widely criticised for some of his decisions at Valhalla Golf Club, he has been strongly backed by one of his predecessors Tony Jacklin.

GOLF Tony Jacklin file photo - 0

"I don't think he did anything wrong," Jacklin said less than 24 hours after Europe had suffered their first Cup defeat in nine years with a 16-1/2 to 11-1/2 loss to the United States.

"I think the Ryder Cup was a very successful event and it is in very good shape after what happened at Valhalla. The best team won and Paul Azinger turned out to be a very good captain.

"You always feel sorry for the team who lose. They played so well and came up empty. It just didn't work out for Europe. By and large, though, I thought Faldo did fine."

Going into the last-day singles matches, Europe trailed the Americans 9-7 and Faldo was taken to task over his decision to send out his big guns at the bottom of the order.

Cup veterans Lee Westwood and Padraig Harrington lost their respective encounters long after the US had clinched the trophy for the first time since their Brookline win in 1999.

"I looked at the singles line-up yesterday and I could see a European victory in the morning," said Jacklin, who led Europe to two Ryder Cup victories and a tie in his four spells.

"I thought it lined up very well for Europe but young Anthony Kim never let (Sergio) Garcia into that first game and basically Europe didn't win enough of those first matches to allow the anchors to do what they might have done."

American rookie Kim crushed Garcia 5&4 in the top match to set the tone for the home team on the final day.

"Westwood really didn't come up with as many points as expected and Padraig looked like he struggled all week," Jacklin, 64, said. "There is risk in any way you put these out but I was very comfortable with the singles order."

Faldo was also criticised for overlooking Cup stalwarts Darren Clarke and Colin Montgomerie as his two wildcard picks, opting instead for Ian Poulter and Paul Casey.

"I was with him (Faldo) at Wentworth two days before he made his captain's picks and he was comfortable with his picks," said Jacklin.

"If he needed vindication with regard to Ian Poulter, he certainly got it because Poulter was man of the tournament."

Briton Poulter, the most controversial wildcard choice, won four points out of a possible five at Valhalla, the most on either team.

"I personally was always on the fence with regards to Poulter," added Jacklin, the 1969 Open and 1970 US Open champion.

"He has never won anything in this country in America and, even though he has won a few times in Europe, I still wasn't sure what he was made of.

"But he showed us at Valhalla and came through as a star. It could well take him to the next level. We can criticise that Nick didn't bring Darren but then who are you going to leave out? Maybe Europe need more picks."

Reuters

Comment 1 - 10 of 10

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. whe will azinger pay his fine

    From Sfa D, on Wed 24 Sep 10:37AM
  2. I feel Faldo has been much maligned and Jacklin got it about right.
    His list on day 3 got us after the opening finishes within a point, and it was the middle order (all by right yeam qualifiers) who lost it to some excellent US play.

    From nthescout, on Tue 23 Sep 2:33PM
  3. AZINGER SHUD BE BANNED AND FINED FOR INCITING CHERRS FOR OPPONENTS MISSED SHOTS

    From raymonda222, on Tue 23 Sep 12:20PM
  4. I'm sure Monty and Clarke could well have been there had Faldo had 4 picks instead of 2 and certainly Westwood would have played better had he had Clarke there. Luke Donald would more than likely have played had he not been injured, which would have had a positive effect on Casey. However, I'm not sure if some of the negative comments are coming from people who actually watched it. The golf was stupendous - nobody really 'lost' their matches, they were 'won'! What can you do when the likes of Boo are 7 under after 10 holes?! Apart from the odd stuffing like Garcia's, all the matches were pretty close and the crowd played a big part in that. It's amazing how often the harder putts go in on the home team's side as opposed to the visiting side. It must make all the difference when you're standing there over one and 40,000 people are right behind you and willing it in rather than willing you to miss. I thought the crowds were great, the golf was great and the Ryder cup is alive and well! The US players surpassed themselves, they all seemed to have wanted to be there and looked like they have found that team spirit that seemed to be lacking for the last few Ryders - Azinger has to be congratulated for that. However, roll on 2 years for the European revenge!

    From justin.earley@..., on Tue 23 Sep 11:19AM
  5. I have no idea why all this @#$% is being written about Nick Faldo. If three of your biggest stars don't play well, what do you expect. The decision he did make about picking Poulter was the right one...so the thing you really can hold him against, he did well in. In addition a lot of matches were very close and if things had gone just slightly differently or if this year had been on European soil, then the results could have been very different and then everyone would be writing about how brillant he was. Just because the team lost doesn't mean that someone is automatically useless.

    I would like him to have a chance to put this right in the future...who knows Tiger might be back and that will give Europe a real chance of winning then!!!

    From DomP, on Tue 23 Sep 8:08AM
  6. Kevin, I noticed that you forgot to mention the fact that Faldo's wildcard Poulter picked up four points for Europe over the weekend. Had he been as lame as Harrington, Westwood and Garcia then I guess you'd have room to complain.
    Also the you forgot to mention that the Americans played some stunning golf and never let Europe get their necks in front.
    Its easy to criticise people who have always attracted criticism, but maybe you should take a step back and look at it again. Cos I think you'll find that actually Faldo made a lot more good decisions than bad.
    Had Garcia and Westwood gone out on saturday morning and got mauled, Faldo would have been blamed for that....He made the difficult decisions to attempt to get Europe back into it. At the end of the day had some of the other players who were there by right been able to compete with the likes of Weekley, Holmes, Furyk, and Perry then Europe would have won. As it is the only Europeans other than Poulter who competed were Rose Karlsson and McDowell.

    From awkwardspike, on Tue 23 Sep 8:07AM
  7. Faldo was a total disgrace. He dropped Monty and Clarke - the soul of the team - and did the damage right there. You just had to look at the EU team - no life in their faces. Then Faldo screwed up completely on the last day – what sort of backwards logic was he applying there? Finally, he wasn't even gracious in defeat and didn't congratulate the US team properly. He should be kicked out of his captaincy for ver.

    Jacklin, in not criticizing Faldo, is being a coward. He is simply thinking of his own vested interests in Golf, and is doing damage to the credibility of objective value in the Ryder Cup as a competition and on paving the way for future captains to screw up and not be held responsible.

    The bottom line is that Faldo was a vacant, stupid captain with no strategy, no soul, no sense of the big picture and no loyalty.

    Kevin Nolan,
    Dublin.

    From Kevin Nolan, on Tue 23 Sep 3:18AM
  8. Faldo is the best british golfer in modern times. Why do the pundits keep knocking him? is it because they are jealous. I thought some of the comments on 5 live by a former captain were totally out of order.

    From pete.major@..., on Tue 23 Sep 12:21AM
  9. Lets not forget we do not have a devine right to always win. The law of average says the US would win sometime and now this fuels the next Rydet Cup in Wales to be just as good. The golf on Sunday was at its best. Poulter was great as was all of the young guns.

    From bpcrutchley, on Mon 22 Sep 9:24PM
  10. Perhaps it would help to retain a level playing field if Ryder Cup rules stated how many picks each captain was allowed. If not, then it makes sense to provide the European captain with as much flexibility as the USA captain. It's rather too simplistic to presume that players dominating tour competitions throughout the previous years will automatically perform in this type of event (has Tiger really done himself justice in previous Ryder Cups? - although you would leave him out deliberately at your peril!)

    From ROY R, on Mon 22 Sep 9:11PM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account