Premier League - Garrido accuses hostile United

Eurosport - Tue, 22 Sep 08:34:00 2009

Manchester City defender Javier Garrido has accused derby rivals Manchester United of creating a hostile climate between the two clubs.

FOOTBALL 2007-2008 Premier League Javier Garrido, Manchester City - 0

Substitute Garrido was struck on the head by a coin as he headed down the tunnel at half-time of the derby at Old Trafford which United won 4-3.

"I've been in England for two seasons and this was the match with more fanaticism than any other," Garrido told the Daily Mail.

"I know other derbies but this atmosphere was incredible with insults flying as soon as we arrived at the stadium."

Garrido believes he was not the target in the coin-throwing incident.

He added: "I was hit by a coin on the head when I was just walking calmly down the tunnel but I believe the target was Carlos Tevez, but I was standing next to him at the time.

"This was seen by Manchester United staff but nobody offered any kind of reason.

"Manchester City have not provoked any of this controversy and United have created a climate of hostility against us."

PA Sport

Comment 66 - 85 of 85

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. "Manchester City have not provoked any of this­ controversy and United have created a climate of­ hostility against us."

    i take it Garrido­ conveniently missed the "welcome to­ manchester" poster??

    From mark, on Tue 22 Sep 6:20PM
  2. 1. We won the laegue las year dosent matter who we beat­ and who we didnt.
    2. We have made abetter start to this­ year without tevez and ronaldo.
    3. 30 seconds per­ sbstitute and per goal is in fifas rulebook. Hence 4­ goals 2 minutes. $ subs another 2 mins equals 4­ minutes.
    4. Goal and sub in extra time. Another minute­ but ref decide bellamy over celebrated.
    End of we were­ better than you and deserved the 3 points.

    From jeemy.wilson, on Tue 22 Sep 3:32PM
  3. The FACT of the matter is that Utd recorded more than­ twice the shots city did (21 to 10) 11 corners to­ city's 1, and 60% possession throughout the 90­ minutes and completely outplayed City in the second­ half, sure we didnt capitalise on the countless chances­ we had in the second half but it goes some way to­ showing how we controlled the play throughout. R.E #85­ Kevin Roberts, ok so even if only 3 goals had been­ scored and 2 subs before the 90 minutes was up that­ adds up to 4 minutes. As any delays after 90 minutes­ have to be taken in to account with added time the­ following is true. Bellamy's goal just before 90­ mins resulted in play not restarting until 91+, add on­ the 4 mins added time= 95 mins, then carrick sub adds­ another 30secs = 95 mins 30 seconds. Owens goal was 95­ mins and 28 seconds. Arguement over!!!!!

    From Christopher, on Tue 22 Sep 3:31PM
  4. wow post 77 do you even understand that what football­ is all about
    You are talking of us been given more­ time and the penalty in the arsenal game
    it all boils­ down to the fact that we played strong against arsenal­ and totally out play City in the second half
    the only­ solid thing city had was the bulldog Tevez and the­ ballamy Wonder goal apart from that we were all over­ city
    only 9% of playing happen in the United half in­ the whole second half and does that not tell you who­ the stronger team is.... Yeah CR is gone and Bulldog is­ wearing blue but we will still reign over the league­ like we always do so
    get your game head on and think­ logically 3yr in a roll well when was the last time­ anyone else did that in the premiership. Stop hating­ and pay respect to one of the greatest football clubs­ in the world at the moment ...
    Oh and stop hiding and­ get urself a name so we can call you out....

    From orakle77, on Tue 22 Sep 2:54PM
  5. Re. 72 Christopher - yeah, I WAS at OT for the game­ sitting with my Utd friends in the Exec area and
    (a) I­ had a clear view of Fergie's reaction to the board­ going up saying '4mins'
    (b) the score at that­ time was 3-2, therefore 3 (THREE) goals in the 2nd­ half, not 4 as you state...Bellamy's equaliser came­ after the board was raised;so by my reckoning on your­ spurious claim for 'goals allowances'­ (der...since when?!) there should have been 3mins, plus­ 3 substitutions at 30secs each, making a total of­ 4.5mins! so they completely got it wrong,plus by your­ reckoning the board should've read 6mins taking in­ the '4th' goal in the 2nd half !
    (c) there­ were no injuries at all of any consequence in the 2nd­ half to make up the time however you decide upon it­
    (d) all of my Utd chums were glad to get to half-time­ at 1-1, and to a man they conceded that 3-1 to City­ would've been a fair scoreline had Tevez/Lescott­ scored because, as one of them said to me,­ 'You're passing us off the pitch'
    (e) Utd­ raised their game in the 2nd half and could've­ scored a couple more; but like City in the 1st, they­ DIDN'T

    Get your facts right...

    From kevin.roberts58, on Tue 22 Sep 2:52PM
  6. number 79 "rooney dived" at arsenal what i a­ load of rubbish if almunia well ok any keeper for that­ matter comes out and dives at a players feet he should­ be very careful to get the ball look at the incident at­ arsenal he DID NOT ill repeat NOT touch the ball he DID­ ill repeat did touch rooney its stonewall penalty when­ that happens im a keeper meself i know that keepers are­ allowed to use their hands but if those hands are used­ to impeed a player in the box in any way its a pen no­ arguments even if it was not intentional or malicious­ thats the rules with keepers on saying that i dont­ think almunia was malicious just had bad timing that is­ why the ref did not send him off if the ref thinks­ their was intent to get the player ie not accidental­ then the keeper will hit the showers early either way­ its going to be a pen! do i think rooney made more of­ it than he should have yes and no yes he made a bit­ much of it but if it is a definate pen like it was in­ that case rooney cud have done 3 back flips and landed­ in the crowd holding his face it would stil have been a­ penalty

    From steven_livingstone, on Tue 22 Sep 2:19PM
  7. Fact is in the end both teams had 97 min to score­ goals. It was a great derby and I look forward to­ seeing the united scum come to eastlands next year. ­ Maybe we will have some bricks instead of coins.

    From Tiger, on Tue 22 Sep 2:17PM
  8. #73
    +1 for Liveinthepast FC!!! :-)))

    From Roy, on Tue 22 Sep 2:01PM
  9. Post 79, I'm getting fed up with people on here­ making wild accussations based once again on no fact,­ Every commentator and analist agrees that the penalty­ decision against Arsenal in the Man Utd game was­ correct. Also go ahead and make my day and actually­ give evidence for the FA bias towards Man Utd, or are­ you as I suspect just one more man regurgitating the­ miss-informed views of others?

    From Christopher, on Tue 22 Sep 1:58PM
  10. i meant own goal not won goal lol

    From ANONYMOUS, on Tue 22 Sep 1:54PM
  11. Also for all you jealous types who have nothing better­ than to claim that Utd are somehow in bed with the FA­ and get far more extra time than other teams, the­ reality is as was discovered by Sky Sports that Man Utd­ are actually towards the bottom of the league with­ regards to extra time being added on in games!!! The­ facts speak for themselves people, stop jumping on the­ anti Man Utd band wagon and start looking at the­ facts!!! Cue randon Anti Man Utd comments based on no­ evidence whatsoever and a little 3rd hand rambling from­ a guy known only as "Dave" down the­ local.......

    From Christopher, on Tue 22 Sep 1:50PM
  12. post 73
    stfu what do you mean you have beat arsenal­ and city
    well i didnt say u didnt beat them
    but how did­ you beat
    1) arsenal = won goal and penalty did man utd­ have any real sniff at goal no jjust pure luck and tht­ diving bastrad rooney
    2) man city = umm no major­ delays in the game no injury for no reason 4 mins added­ time nd tht scumbag ref didnt blow the whistle after­ the four minutes u @#$% went on to socre at like 96­ mins
    but it is a shame tht its alex Ferguson that­ goes and harass the whole FA and press when any little­ thing happens to man utd
    u guyz shouldnt wprry
    sold­ ronaldo nd tevz to get umm owen nd valencia

    hopefully­ the stupid FA will stop being bias towards man utd nd­ handle a mtch fairly nd lets see how manyy big games­ those scumbags will win
    afterall last year they were­ beaten home and away by livepool got one pojnt outta­ arsenal and 4 points out of chelsea that was when they­ even had CR and tevez dw when the season settles in u­ will see tht man utd will regret those retarded­ transfers they made nd tht red nosed alckie will shut­ his motuh nd hopefully u guyz odont get refs tht are­ bias and mamn utd fans then see how many games u will­ win scum bagsz

    From ANONYMOUS, on Tue 22 Sep 1:47PM
  13. Ha! Garrido can't understand the heated atmosphere­ at a derby game!!!! What sort of players are the arabs­ millions buying ? Sounds like the responce of a­ mercenary who wants a nice easy time collecting his­ huge salary to me, Also, I was begining to think that­ Man City were serious title contenders, but with this­ spitefull, petty reaction after being beaten by the­ (far) better team says they are still a small chavvy­ bunch of pretenders.

    From mgodsall, on Tue 22 Sep 1:37PM
  14. Comment 71.
    the facts are the home team always gets the­ benefit of the watch and that is a fact. This has­ happened numerous time to Liverpool and Chelsea aswell.­ The problem is everyone jumps on the bandwagon when its­ United. But if uz really care that much take it to Fifa­ its there refs adding the time on not United. Bottom­ line is you play to th whistle i learned that at 8­ years old. Citys own fault for thinking the game was­ over. Latly if u notice the guardians report inly­ included United home games. What happened to the other­ 40 games in those 3 seasons..

    From jeemy.wilson, on Tue 22 Sep 1:12PM
  15. #71, and also "matched Utd Toe to Toe", dont­ make me laugh, were you even watching the match????­ watch the second half again and see if your willing to­ make ignorant comments again.

    From Christopher, on Tue 22 Sep 1:07PM
  16. Post 59.
    Slipping away. Havent we just won the title 3­ years on the trot again. Havent we just beat City­ already beat Arsenal. One bad performance against­ Burnley and everybody thinks we are losing it. People­ like you need there had examined United are still the­ most dominant team in England and until the title is­ away for more than 5 seasons that will continue to be­ the case. You say take off the red misted glasses I say­ go and buy a pair. We are 2nd at the moment and­ everyone knows we have always been slow out the blocks.­ City spent how much money 120 million and we could of­ and probably should have put 6 past them.
    I wonder what­ team you support?
    Its got to be either City or­ Livinthepast FC.

    From jeemy.wilson, on Tue 22 Sep 1:05PM
  17. #71, what do you mean there was no justification for­ the 4 minutes of extra time? It is standard procedure­ to add 1 min per goal of which there were 4 in the­ second half. As for extra time being added on to these­ 4 minutes in the second half, the extra time as­ indicated by the fourth official is a MINIMUM amount of­ added time to be played and any delays to play after­ normal time has come to an end must also be taken in to­ account! It has also been proven that Owens goal came­ only 1 second after added time and delays so please get­ your facts straight everybody. The important thing to­ remember is that City were lucky to even be 3-3 come 90­ mins and Man Utd had peppered the goal for the best­ part of 30 mins with the ball barely ever making it in­ to Utds half. Remember also that City had the extra­ time too, just because Man Utd had the skill to­ capitalise only goes to show how vast the gap between­ the two teams still is!!!

    From Christopher, on Tue 22 Sep 1:05PM
  18. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    City should've defended better at 3-3, for sure,­ but the facts are (1) when the score was 3-2 and the­ 4mins extra time was posted, Ferguson went ballistic­ with the official, querying the length of time arrived­ at (2) apart from the 2 Utd & 1 City substitutions­ in the 2nd half, there was no justification for these­ 4mins extra time (3)read today's Guardian for an­ analysis of how Utd benefit regularly from additional­ time set by the officials.

    Had City scored twice to­ win 4-3 I would still be saying the same thing about­ this and other recent controversies - we have the­ technology to prevent problems arising with goalline­ incidents/timekeeping and so on. We should use it like­ other sports do. When multimillions are at stake with­ such things, it beggars belief that­ FIFA/UEFA/Premiership administrators drag their feet on­ the introduction of such technology.

    As for the game,­ it WASN'T the best ever 'derby', no way­ with the two awful defences on display (if City got­ '3 lucky goals', Fergie, then thank your lucky­ stars that Richards gave you nos. 1&4, whilst­ Lescott/Toure were at fault for nos. 2&3 without­ any question)

    Finally, the game was a statement of­ intent from City, we matched Utd toe-to-toe on their­ own patch AND as team that's only been together for­ 4/5 games AND without 4 players who'd walk into any­ Premiership side. Given that we played Utd's best­ XI, it will be interesting to watch what happens when­ City's squad is fully fit and the team beds in. And­ not only that, come the next transfer window, who's­ going to have the money to spend on players to kick on,­ rather than servicing gross corporate debts...? Utd?­ Liverpool? Arsenal? Chelsea (double-whammy with the­ ban)? I think not...

    From kevin.roberts58, on Tue 22 Sep 12:32PM
  19. our ground with adebayor cant wait

    From drew86, on Tue 22 Sep 12:31PM
  20. joe90, YOU ARE DELUDED IF YOU THINK OUR CROWN IS­ SLIPPING

    From the silent assassin, on Tue 22 Sep 11:54AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account