Renault handed suspended ban

Eurosport - Mon, 21 Sep 21:18:00 2009

Renault have been handed a two-year suspended ban from the Formula One world championship after admitting to race-fixing while Flavio Briatore has been banned from the sport.

FORMULA 1 2009 Italian GP Renault Fernando Alonso Foro: EFE - 0

The French car manufacturer, appearing before an FIA World Motor Sport Council hearing in Paris, had said it would not contest accusations the team ordered Brazilian Nelson Piquet Jr to crash his car into a wall at last year's Singapore Grand Prix so that Spanish team mate Fernando Alonso might win.

"The ING Renault F1 team admitted that the team had conspired with its driver Nelson Piquet Jr to cause a deliberate crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix, in breach of the International Sporting Code and F1 Sporting Regulations'" the FIA statement read.

The suspended ban will last until the end of the 2011 season, and the World Motor Sport Council will "only activate this disqualification if Renault F1 is found guilty of a comparable breach duiring that time".

The statement added: "The World Motor Sport Council considers Renault F1's breach relating to the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix to be of unparalleled severity.

"Renault F1's breaches not only compromised the integrity of the sport but also endangered the lives of spectators, officials, other competitors and Nelson Piquet Jr himself."

Former team boss Briatore was banned from any further involvement in Formula One, including driver management. The team's head of engineering Pat Symonds was banned for five years from FIA-run events.

Double world champion Fernando Alonso was exonerated of any involvement at the hearing.

"Mr Alonso was not in any way involved in Renault F1's breach of the regulations," the FIA said.

Piquet Jr had been granted immunity by the FIA before the hearing.

FIA president Max Mosley said after the hearing that the team would remain in Formula One, but Renault F1 chairman Bernard Rey did not comment.

Reuters

Comment 375 - 394 of 394

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. dsor.
    I'll tell you what. Try this for an­ experiment. Fit a set of racing slick tyres to your­ car. Then when it next rains, try to drive it full­ speed.
    Then get a computer wheeled to your hospital­ bed and tell us how it went.

    From big_davey_b, on Wed 23 Sep 4:50AM
  2. Perhaps FIA should have sentanced the Renault bosses to­ be crashed into a wall at high speed to see how they­ liked it!!Punishment handed out shows no bottle on FIAs­ part
    if Mclaren had been involved, it would have been­ the management that would have been suspended, not the­ sentance!!! Does Moseley have a secret sponsorship from­ Renault??

    From WILLIAM, on Tue 22 Sep 1:52PM
  3. To all those muppets who say that MASSA should be­­ Champion. Err, don't think so. Since Renault­­ cheated and if TEFLONSO was stripped of his win and­­ disqualified then the other finishers in the Singapore­­ race would all move up one place. ROSBERG would get­ his­ maiden win. HAMILTON would get 2 more points and­ MASSA­ would move from 13th to 12th. MASSA lost the­ WDC­ because his pit crew let him leave the pits with­ his­ fuel hose still attached. I know it was a great­ laugh­ but it cost MASSA the WDC, it was NOTHING to do­ with ­ the NP jnr crash.

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 11:38AM
  4. #399: If he still had laps of fuel on board why did he­ pit? He left the pits with his fuel hose still­ attached! His pit crew cost him the race and the WDC.­ Watch the video! Some muppets will cling to any­ misguided belief because they hate to think that LH out­ drove the Ferraris.

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 11:37AM
  5. richardwilson147 @392 Why did Ron Dennis walk?

    From Zak, on Tue 22 Sep 11:25AM
  6. @396 , no impact on the race, you are talking with your­ trousers down, who was leading with still laps of fuel­ on board, before the accident?

    From Zak, on Tue 22 Sep 11:21AM
  7. @(394)Renault (and Toyota) are going to withdraw before­ the­ begining of the 2010 season, you are joking, not­ with one of Frances idols taking over, go to France­ Yahoo my friend.

    From Zak, on Tue 22 Sep 10:36AM
  8. Marino: Can you stop posting in CAPITALS, it makes it­ very hard to read and it is the equivalent of SHOUTING.­ Thank you.

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 10:27AM
  9. Renault (and Toyota) are going to withdraw before the­ begining of the 2010 season anyway so it is no­ punishment at all. When these two teams have gone­ perhaps the FIA can make a rule that the big­ manufacturers can only supply engines and gear boxes­ instead of holding our sport to ransom and­ blackmail.all the time. And that includes Mercedes.

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 10:24AM
  10. HELLO MY LITTLE HOT HEADED BUNNIES, WHAT VERY HOT HEADS­ WE HAVE, IT'S VERY EARLY MORNING OVER HERE IN CHILE­ AND THE AIR IS CRISP AND COLD, A BIT LIKE THE WELCOME­ MAT HERE ON THIS SITE. A TWO YEAR SUSPENDED BAN FOR­ RENAULT........WELL MY F1 BUDDIES, WHAT EVER THE­ PUNISHMENT IT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAVE ANY BIT, RENAULT­ LIKE TOYOTA ARE VERY, VERY LIKELY TO WITHDRAW OUT OF F1­ BY DECEMBER THIS YEAR, THIS WHOLE SAGA WILL TAINT THE­ BACK YELLOW BOARD OF THE RENAULT LOGO VERY DARK, AND­ DURING THESE TIMES RENAULT WON'T BE ENJOYING THIS­ KIND OF EXPOSURE. WITH FLAVIO AND SYMONDS FALLING ON­ THEIR SWORDS AND PIQUETS SHOWING MORE SPITE THAN GUTS,­ HAS MAD THE LITTLE BUNNIES IN THE RENAULT MANAGEMENT­ HOT LITTLE BUNNIES, BOILING THEIR MINDS OUT. RENAULT­ CAN'T AFFORD THIS KIND OF EXPOSURE AND I SAY EXPECT­ A DECISION FROM RENAULT SOON. WITH ALONSO GOING TO­ FERRARI AND NO ONE GOING TO RENAULT, RENAULT WILL CUT­ OFF THEIR INVESTMENT INTO THE RENAULT TEAM, DON'T­ BE SURPRISED IF RENAULT CONTINUES ON AS AN ENGINE­ SUPPLIER, TWO MORE NEW TEAMS MEANS TO MORE CUSTOMER­ TEAMS LOOKING FOR ENGINES. LISTEN MY F1 BUDDIES,­ DON'T WORRY ABOUT JUSTICE FOR RENAULT, JUSTICE IS­ ALREADY SERVED.

    From David, on Tue 22 Sep 10:23AM
  11. This is a case of FIA fudging the issue by choosing to­ penalise the individuals involved and ignoring the fact­ that those to people were ultimately in charge of­ Renault. surely, if this is how such cases are judged,­ Maclarenon this basis should have their $ 100 million­ refunded and be given a retrospective suspende­ sentence, and the FIA should puinish the individuals­ concerned by bannbing them from all forms of top class­ motorsport.

    I would guess that the entire leniency was­ based on the fact that it was likely known that Renault­ would have quit the sport, if any draconian penalty was­ was made against the team. I bet Mercedes and Maclaren­ feel extremely hard done by.

    From Richard, on Tue 22 Sep 10:17AM
  12. SUSPENDED SENTENCE IS NOT ENOUGH.. BANNISH THIS TEAM­ AND ALL ITS DRIVERS, TOGETHER
    WITH RENAULT FROM FI­ FOEVER. THEY ARE NOT WORTH KEEPING IN SUCH A­ SPORT.

    BEL pa zed

    From Brian, on Tue 22 Sep 10:16AM
  13. SUSPENDED SENTENCE IS NOT ENOUGH.. BANNISH THIS TEAM­ AND ALL ITS DRIVERS, TOGETHER
    WITH RENAULT FROM FI­ FOEVER. THEY ARE NOT WORTH KEEPING IN SUCH A­ SPORT.

    BEL pa zed

    From Brian, on Tue 22 Sep 10:06AM
  14. SUSPENDED SENTENCE IS NOT ENOUGH.. BANNISH THIS TEAM­ AND ALL ITS DRIVERS, TOGETHER
    WITH RENAULT FROM FI­ FOEVER. THEY ARE NOT WORTH KEEPING IN SUCH A­ SPORT.

    BEL pa zed

    From Brian, on Tue 22 Sep 10:05AM
  15. SUSPENDED SENTENCE IS NOT ENOUGH.. BANNISH THIS TEAM­ AND ALL ITS DRIVERS, TOGETHER
    WITH RENAULT FROM FI­ FOEVER. THEY ARE NOT WORTH KEEPING IN SUCH A­ SPORT.

    BEL pa zed

    From Brian, on Tue 22 Sep 10:04AM
  16. So Maclaren get passed some papers by a Ferrari­ engineer and get a 50m fine and lose all thier­ points.
    Renault fix results and endanger the lives of­ other drivers and get let off scot free.
    What sort of­ judgement is this?
    Why didnt Alonso who was the­ benificiary of the cheating and almost certainly­ complicit not get banned for life
    We have seen Alonso­ cheat many times now and never get punished he must be­ Max Moseleys bum boy

    From militarysilks, on Tue 22 Sep 10:02AM
  17. MASSA lost the WDC­ because his pit crew let him leave­ the pits with his­ fuel hose still attached. I know it­ was a great laugh­ but it cost MASSA the WDC, it was­ NOTHING to do with ­ the NP jnr crash.

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 10:00AM
  18. Barrie c: What the #### has LH got to do with Renault­ cheating. FOOL

    From Biggles, on Tue 22 Sep 9:57AM
  19. If I were Martin Whitmarsh I can't help feeling­ that my team were penalised much harder than Renault­ have been for an incident that could have injured or­ killed someone, by comparison to stealing and lying. In­ the real world an attempted murder/manslaughter charge­ would have received a longer "stretch" than­ stealing/copyright infringement/corporate espionage­ would have, whether you admitted it or not.. I would­ also feel that the only reason Renault recieved such a­ lenient sentence was due to their perpetual threat to­ walk away from the sport. I as McLaren clearly­ wouldn't have had the option to use that­ "card" as I wouldn't have a business (not­ until Ron sorts out the car company that is!) left, and­ therefore will always be disadvantaged in all the­ decision making in F1 by the FIA, who will expect the­ likes of McLaren, Williams etc (the dedicated racing­ teams) to always be there and to have to accept their­ decisions. Unlike the part time teams of the­ manufacturers who are only there until they get bored­ with the marketing investment they are making and­ decide to focus solely on their real business, making­ consumer vehicles.

    The day the manufacturers decamp­ from running F1 teams will be a good day for sport.­ They will return to being part of the supply chain to­ professional racing teams again. The rules and­ decisions for those teams will be less biased towards­ one type of team to another one, as they will all be in­ the same boat, "garagistas". Who knows maybe­ even Bernie may remember his FISA/FOCA roots and­ reposition his business to support the full time racing­ teams again.. But what of Ferrari, or should that be­ Fiat!... Now there is a question...

    From stefan, on Tue 22 Sep 9:56AM
  20. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    what is important now is that cos of that accident in­ singapore,Massa lost his world champion,cos he was the­ leader when that accident happend....poor massa always­ bad luck

    From bilal h, on Tue 22 Sep 9:55AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account