Championship - No replay for 'phantom' goal match

Eurosport - Tue, 23 Sep 11:08:00 2008

The Football League have announced that the 2-2 draw between Reading and Watford which featured a 'phantom' goal will not be replayed.

FOOTBALL: Reading manager Steve Coppell - 0

Linesman Nigel Bannister flagged for a goal instead of a corner when the ball crossed the goal-line well wide of the post during a goalmouth scramble from a corner at Vicarage Road.

Referee Stuart Attwell, who became the Premier League's youngest official last month at the age of 25, awarded a goal despite not a single Reading player appealing or celebrating the 'strike', which at the time was accredited to John Eustace as an own goal.

The match finished 2-2, denying Watford all three points.

Andy Williamson, the League's chief opperating officer, said: "The Laws of the Game give no discretion in these matters - the referee's decision regarding whether a goal is scored or not is final and binding. Given this explicit position, the League cannot intervene".

On Monday, Reading boss Steve Coppell (pictured) admitted he was willing to replay the match after reviewing the evidence.

"If the authorities decide a replay is the correct thing to do then I've got no objections whatsoever.

"I'm not sure there's a precedent but if that's what people decide then I am quite happy to do it.

"We don't want to be seen to be taking advantage of anything.

"I have sympathy with Watford and I really don't know what to say to make it right.

"But if the Football League phone me now and say something was definitely wrong I'm happy to go along with it."

The decision has been roundly condemned as the worst decision seen on a football pitch, a view backed up by Reading midfielder Stephen Hunt even though he has retained some sympathy for the officials.

Hunt said: "It was a screamer! No, it was probably the worst decision I have ever witnessed.

"We can't do anything about it. It's not our mistake, but what can you do? You can't say 'no ref, it wasn't in'.

"He seemed all right. He's a young referee. But after this he'll probably be sitting at home next week. I've had him before and he's been all right.

"It was just a bad day at the office. He talks, he respects you and you respect him. I can understand Watford's frustration, but everyone makes mistakes."

Mike Hytner / Eurosport

Comment 29 - 48 of 68

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. Terrible unjust situation, something must be done!

    From kenyon634, on Mon 22 Sep 8:30PM
  2. I think that Watford must be allowed three points as­ that was not a goal and its wrong

    From kenyon634, on Mon 22 Sep 8:29PM
  3. The fa are a disgrace and I am not sure if I can take­ football seriously anymore.
    What now, refs have a bet,­ make up a goal and win money?
    Give Watford the points­ for a win!

    From kenyon634, on Mon 22 Sep 8:27PM
  4. this is the F.A all over!! They make the rules up as­ they go along! Eric Cantona cracked a thug who ran 20­ rows to shout insults about his mother. The thug was­ sentenced got found guilty of threatening behaviour and­ smashed up the court room! Cantona gets a 9 month ban.­ Joey Barton the serial thug voley's a fellow team­ mate in the face and hospitalises him and gets a six­ game ban. Rio Ferdinand misses a drug test and gets a 9­ month ban and a £50,000 fine. Adrian Mutu tested­ possitive for coke and got a 7 month ban and a £20,000­ fine! It's clear that was not a goal so how the­ hell can they let it stand! What a disgrace! They can­ wipe out John Terrys red card but they can allow a non­ goal to stand!! This game should be replayed or the­ fake goal should be wiped off! shoking events and­ shocking response from the F.A

    From glen, on Mon 22 Sep 8:19PM
  5. consider the scenario a couple of years back when both­ were in premiership...Imagine this phantom goal put­ reading into europe and watford relegated to C/Ship?

    From joe.allen73, on Mon 22 Sep 7:40PM
  6. I trust Reading would also grant free admittance to the­ 'replay'?

    newtonpm:
    The 1999 Arsenal v Sheff­ Utd cup tie was a perfect opportunity for Arsenal­ players and Wenger to demonstrate sportsmanship. The­ captain (not sure if it was Bould or Parlour) could­ have instructed his players to allow Blades player to­ score at the other end unopposed. Instead MOTD gushed­ about Arsenal's sporting gesture by offering a­ replay. How sporting, another 40,000 Highbury gate -­ yeah right. Had Arsenal granted free entry to the­ replay and travel expenses from Sheffield, that might­ have appeased 5,000 Yorkshiremen.

    From joe.allen73, on Mon 22 Sep 7:31PM
  7. how are we ever going to respect the referees if the­ top men in the FA don't even deserve it?

    From Sam H, on Mon 22 Sep 7:28PM
  8. They should replay the game... why wouldn't they?

    From Sam H, on Mon 22 Sep 7:27PM
  9. As a Watford fan,i'am staggerd by this decision,but­ why have a go at Coppell or the Reading players ?? The­ error was made by the officials,they are there to­ decide the outcome of such issues.Mistakes are made in­ every match (not all as obvious as this one­ granted),goal kicks instead of corners,free kicks etc­ etc, which could & has led to a goal being­ scored.If the "goal" had been awarded to­ Watford,i think our players would have done exactly the­ same as the Reading players.If it was left to the­ players to decide every incident then why have any­ officials ?? imagine the problems that would cause !!

    From tanker69692000, on Mon 22 Sep 7:17PM
  10. The FA are just like the Government, usless when the­ truth is put in front of them. The FA should re-write­ the rules that states, what ever the linesman says­ goes, so if he says the team that kicked off the first­ half, can also kick the second half off then thats­ fine. Where are we going next?? Both oficials should be­ suspened and I agree with brian b, the states the ball­ has to cross the line BETWEEN the goal post and the­ cross bar.

    From Ken R, on Mon 22 Sep 7:15PM
  11. its wrong

    From Rachael, on Mon 22 Sep 7:11PM
  12. Coppell knows the match will never be replayed I always­ thought he was a gentleman prior to this but he must­ have known from his own players reaction that it wasnt­ a goal.Why would one of his own players kick it back­ into play if it was going into the net?? Reading had a­ chance to rectify the situation by letting Watford­ equalise both immediately afterwards and after half­ time,they clearly chose not to!! Heard Murty on Radio 5­ and he talked a load of rubbish,he wasnt even playing!­ Perhaps they will let Watford score straight away at­ Reading,then my faith in Coppell will be restored.As­ usual the FA have come out with a pathetic do nothing­ statement washing their hands of everything.Why dont­ they speak in language people understand.The ref also­ booked watford players as a result of this and sent­ Boothroyd to the stands all this should be rescinded.

    From mark.154bishop, on Mon 22 Sep 6:53PM
  13. oh well at least next year we all know the answer the­ BBCs Question of sport "what happened next"­ and out of interest if the referees decision is binding­ how come John Terry was playing yesterday against Man­ Utd. Thought the ref gave him a RED CARD

    From paul, on Mon 22 Sep 6:41PM
  14. dont you think its time we had goal line technology? as­ for respect for the refs, i say lololololololol, stop­ it your killing me, lolololol

    From wilfyboy, on Mon 22 Sep 6:21PM
  15. what i don't understand why the supposed acting­ assistant referee didn't find it a little strange ­ it was a "readng " player trying to hook the­ ball out of the goal or was he colour blind and all the­ players were wearing the same coloured socks

    From paul, on Mon 22 Sep 6:14PM
  16. Coppels no mug he knew by saying he would welcome a­ reply it was gonna be a non starter. It makes him look­ good in everyones eyes. The ball went out of play and­ was kicked back into play.....No goal... correct. So,­ why is everyone talking about Coppel, the ref and the­ linesman. A goal was not scored, this being the case­ then Reading should lose that goal. Final score 1-2­ to Watford. sorted. If it never was a goal, then it­ shouldn't stand. Game over.

    From martin a, on Mon 22 Sep 6:11PM
  17. The Football League have exposed themselves as­ 'idiots'.

    All this talk about 'explicit­ position' & 'no discretion' - I think­ they need to wake up and make the right decision. There­ is no excuse given the proof they have in front of­ them.

    I hope Watford miss out on promotion by 1 point­ and sue the FL...maybe not, that won't do any­ good...

    ...how about the Reading players actually­ saying to the ref 'It wasn't in..' they­ have been caught out on TV as cheats - or why couldnt­ they have let Watford score immediately from the­ re-start.

    shame on Reading and the FL...

    From BillB, on Mon 22 Sep 6:02PM
  18. Sorry HarryP, don't think people have missed the­ point at all. You can't say giving a goal to a side­ that didn't score, is any different in principal­ than giving a red card to a player that didn't­ foul.

    On many occasions goals have been given that­ 'didn't go in', this just happens to be a­ ridiculously extreme example. I appreciate that i'm­ the umpteenth person to say this, but it doesn't­ change the fact that a referee's decision is final.

    From Bry, on Mon 22 Sep 5:57PM
  19. Ron I watch the other leagues as well and accept that­ there are fewer mistakes by refs however this could be­ something to do with the pace of the English game. We­ play a far more Gung Ho end to end game. More pace more­ aggression, more room for a refs error.

    From AndyH, on Mon 22 Sep 5:51PM
  20. fair play reading nows it was wrong and have offered­ the replay thats what u call sportsman ship not like­ these premiership players who moan there playin too­ much already

    From Danny P, on Mon 22 Sep 5:44PM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account