Reuters - Wed, 28 Jul 20:55:00 2010
Young French sensation Christophe Lemaitre tore up the script at the European Championships to deny Dwain Chambers the one that got away and storm to 100m gold in Barcelona.
The gold medal appeared to be Chambers's for the taking with 30 metres to go but the Frenchman found an extra gear and roared home in 10.11 seconds, while Mark Lewis-Francis secured a shock silver.
It was to be Chambers's final step on the road from ruin to redemption but Lemaitre has been making ripples in athletics circles this season - and he downed the British veteran with a tidal wave in the closing stages.
The European Championships have never been kind to Chambers. In 1998 in Budapest he had to settle for silver and while he did take gold in 2002 in Munich it was then stripped away after he tested positive for banned substances a year later.
To rub salt into the wounds, Chambers did not even make the podium. The positions from second to fifth where all given a time of 10.18 and it was Britain's Lewis-Francis who took the most surprising of silver medals.
Bronze went to France's Martial Mbandjock while Chambers had to settle for fifth.
"I didn't have a good start in the final but picked up very well on my speed," said Lemaitre, the fastest man in Europe this year after setting a national record of 9.98 this month.
"It was a brilliant final and I'm very happy tonight."
Thrust to the fringes of his sport, Chambers was a pariah until he made his return to the global stage at the World Championships last year.
Beating Usain Bolt was never on the cards but a credible sixth place finish did much to enhance his reputation.
Chambers has mellowed with age and is at ease on the track these days but Lemaitre is the new kid on the block.
The disappointment was evident on Chambers's face but he was in philosophical mood after the most painful of defeats.
"I've come here and I've loved every minute of it." said Chambers. "Hats off to Christophe Lemaitre. He hasn’t put a foot wrong at all.
"Of course I'm disappointed and I'm sure it will sink in but for now I just want to say that it didn't go for me here but I want to look forward to competing next year."
While Chambers was left to rue another cruel twist of fate, Lewis-Francis's silver medal was just as surprising as his senior compatriot's failure to reach the podium.
The 27-year-old has, just like Chambers, spent his fair share of time in the wilderness with injuries and dips in form curtailing his progress since 2004 where he anchored Great Britain to sprint relay Olympic gold in Athens.
But Lewis-Francis, who sped down the same track on which Linford Christie blazed his Olympic trail of destruction 18 years ago, was quick to announce he is back with a bang.
"I came here on a lucky star and I was told I would not even make the final," said Lewis-Francis, who was originally only named in the relay squad.
"But I've came here and I've got silver and for all the knocks and the setbacks I've taken, this makes it all worthwhile.
"This is the start of the rebuilding of Mark Lewis-Francis.
"I can't say how much of an honour it is to be coached by Linford Christie. He has been an inspiration for me since I was a kid and he has motivated me in every race at these championships."
It is not the medal Great Britain were hoping for and it will not be around the neck of the expected recipient. But as the final chapter in Chambers's career may well have been scribed, a new one in that of Lewis-Francis may just be beginning.
More than the Games / ReutersSign up to our free daily newsletter to recieve the latest news straight to your inbox. Make sure you don’t miss a thing.
Sign up now
Yahoo! News Network
This site is Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! and Eurosport. All rights reserved.
Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our Privacy Policy | About Our Ads.


Comment 31 - 50 of 50
overpraise/ratied british
I am another one that is pleased that DC did not win.
Drug cheats should be banned for life.
What sort of role model is a drug cheat welcomed back in the English team.
I am ashamed and turn off the athletics when he appears.
One other point thats nothing to do with drugs.
Why o why do BBC and others have to play music with athletics and even while the commentaters are talking.
Please stop doing it.
Lematrie has obviously been looking at tapes of Usain Bolt. Remember, he is only 21/2 inches shorter that Bolt.
This proves that it is as much about technique as it is power.
Give him his due, he ran well, and some of the others didn't turn up.....
Chambers is a cheat end of story,in my opinion anyone found cheating by taking drugs in any sport should be banned for life,that includes "sportspeople" that dont turn up for testing so that would apply to Christine Ohurugu and Rio Ferdinand
time is low but keep in mind that Lemaitre had a very bad start
with a good start on this race is under 10sec
I waited for hours to watch this race but was absolutely disappointed with the time this guys where posting.
I mean the time the top three posted was so "1970". They need to step their game up big time cos' that time will not even get them into semi-finals in the World Championship next year. So lets not get carried away. Tyson Gay and Powell are running sub 9.90sec constantly and still can get near Bolt so i wonder how far back this guys will be from Bolt.
I think it is unreasonable to say that Chambers is a 'flop'- after all many of the runners were given the same time at 10.18. Lets wait and see how he gets on through the summer.I wish him good luck. I believe that he should be given a second chance despite the previous drug history.
Lemaitre was the fastest man in Europe this year after setting a national record of 9.98 this month and he managed to keep his head after a slower start to bring home the gold. It was a good performance from and this should give him confidence for the future, how much faster he can run time will tell but he is still young.
As for the Chambers debate, yes he took drugs and in many peoples eyes, like anyone else taking performance enhancing drugs should have been banned for life, but the IAAF ruling was that at that time anyone found guilty should be banned for two years *(it has now been altered and the ban is four years)* so he served his ban and returned, as is his right like any other athlete, people can moan about it but until the IAAF impose a lifetime ban then it is just going to be talked about agian and again every time he runs.
48, i agree. lets face it the time was slow and against the jamacans and americans it wouldnt even be a qualifier for the final at the worlds or olympics so mlf will still have his critics bacause he cant get down to sub10 secs.
well done the french guy..but lets be honest chambers is not world class!!world class 100m sprinters regularly run sub 10 secs especially in major comps chambers never even got in top 3.. his career is never going to progress much further now.and i agree with the others that said he should be banned for life.look at all the medals and glory he stole from the other athletes he beat in the past....
Sorry I forgot. It must be his 'natural ability.'
How silly of me.
Yes.
I find it rather peculiar that Dwain Chemicals can run 60m faster after his ban whilst 'totally not druggy' than before it when he was 'roided off his face.
@42 - 'are you suggesting thta you have never done anything wrong.'
~
Yup. I've never cheated at sports. Thanks for admitting that you do.
I'm a proud brit and it shames me to see chambers in a GB vest whether he wins clean now or not, all the people saying he has paid his dues may be correct in saying so in the eyes of the law but morally the cheating scum will always have dirty hands. the punishment should be a life ban if caught cheating. at the moment the wrong message is being given out that says if you are caught cheating you get suspended where you can train as much as you want, take what you want while you are suspended and come back even stronger. the whole punishment doesnt fit the crime.
Awww....don't you like the truth?
Chambers is a great athlete, no matter what he has doe in the past. He made a mistake and paid the price but he has come back bigger and stronger. When there was no difference in time between 2nd and 5th doesn't suggest that he faded but Lemaitre did run a great race.
All those that are knocking him for his past, are you suggesting thta you have never done anything wrong. Chambers was proudly representng his country last night, what have you ever done to get noticed
So Jamaican schoolkids run faster than 10.11 .............well they would would,nt they
they all take drugs just like their Olympic team
dc "The Brits think that they are so perfect"? Puzzled, I doubt if there is a more self-effacing nation anywhere.
As for your comment about Chambers being the United Kingdom's best hope of a Gold in 2011/2012?
I would submit the women's (and increasingly men's) 400M; men's triple jump; both men's relays; men's 400H;
these are hardly no-hopers and I take it you are only referring to track and field.
semut - it is hardly unreasonable for a broadcaster/media to appeal to their target audience. The hint here is that it is British Eurosport, therefore there is an emphasis (not an exclusivity) on British athletes. If I was in an hotel room in Moscow watching Russian television, I would expect that they would concentrate on Russian athletes (let us not forget Pravda).
@9 & 10
'ppl get over it hes white so wat a great runner is not made great by the colour of his skin'
~
'it dosent make u faster by being black,'
~
Actually it helps if you're a sprinter. Every single Olympic 100m Champion since 1972 (with the exception of 1980 when no-one of note turned up) can trace their ancestry to a geographical area of North West Africa.
Good to see Dwain Chemicals (who is still cheating btw.) fail like a c@nt last night.
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account