Andy,just as 2 keep playing the way he has,dont change­ a thing,and roddick will fall by the wayside,Then its­ on 2 the final and probably Federer,who is not the­ player he use to be,he will retire a beaten finalist

sanchez.santos
Hey you can lose the 'w' too!
I­ know what you mean about Dinara, but her head will be­ fine today; it's merely a last 16 game - the real­ jitters don't come 'til later!!!!!

I still believe on the power of Federer. For sure he­ will outclash Murray on the Final granting if the later­ will reach on that stage. On the women side, i still­ favor the All-Williams fight. They still both have the­ power. The young teenagers are also promising. In­ short, this wimbledon is really interesting to watch.

I am not convinced that Nadal will ever be back and the­ force of before! As for Roger - he is not ready to­ retire! Sampras was the same had a bad year 1996 and­ then went on to win again and again!
Having watched­ Murray live on Saturday - I think he does indeed stand­ a chance of getting to the final but not sure he will­ win it if Roger is on the other side! I think that­ Roger will lift the title for the 6th time!
As for the­ women - Would love to see Mauresmo win again - anything­ but an all Williams final! They are boring and­ uncompetitve!! The title needs to go to someone­ different!

surely murray has the best chance this year,as nadal is­ not there.now we all no if he was there it would be a­ different story.Federer has had his day,he should now­ retire,as is day is gone

and now on monday the competition really starts, in the­ top half of the draw berdych and simon are the ones to­ watch outside the obvious of roddick murray and hewitt,­ there could be a few upsets starting as of soon, sorry­ but wawrinka and ferrero dont figure in my list of­ favourites, in the second half it looks like it is­ plain sailing for fed, can sod, haas or a big powerfull­ ivo upset him on the way i doubt it but who knows. i­ think fed s test will come in the final.

semi finals 1 ~~ Hewitt v Andy Murray ~~~ 2 ­ Djokovic v Federer

So should be as predicted final ­ === Murray v Federer

awesome murray!!!

your brad pitt then?

sharapova is fit

i recall there was a nigerian tennis player in the­ eighties who was good enough to play in slams, SW19­ included. i remember him because i used to think how­ patronising people were when they kept referring to the­ fact that he used to be a ball boy, same thing that was­ said about arthur ashe a decade earlier until he won­ wimbledon and became a unesco ambassador. even the­ armitraj brothers used to be known as former ball boys­ until vijay appeared in a james bond film, the list­ goes on as we internationalists who championed the­ cause of the underdogs remember very well.

that fred perry was very over rated but his t shirts­ are very nice

jo durie now there was a very attractive girl lol

murray would win the doubles on his own

indeed sue barker triumphed at rolland garros in 1976­ and virginia wade took wimbledon in 1977. did joe durie­ not take the US open in 1980 or was she just a­ finalist?