Eurosport - Tue, 29 Jun 09:11:00 2010
Frustrated Eurosport journalist Reda Maher gives a personal insight into England's footballing woes - and offers a solutuion.
Germany’s 4-1 pounding of England exposed serious problems in the national game, and a fatal shortage of what is required in tournament football.
“There is no ‘I’ in team” is a glib phrase but one that resonates somewhat shrilly after Fabio Capello’s side capitulated in their second-round World Cup humiliation at the hands of a largely pubescent Germany side.
This was the team of superstars, winners, experienced campaigners with medals galore that was destined to bring the trophy back to England after 44 years.
But with the gold-plated Bentleys come gold-plated, fragile egos, and it is this - and not any technical deficiency – that is the root cause of England’s problems.
Envy at the successful is human nature, and a particularly pronounced British trait - we love to build them up, knock them down and twist the knife. So it follows that the initial reaction is to point at overpaid rich-kids who don’t share the fans’ pride in the shirt.
But it is not a question of fame or money - Spain, Argentina and tournament favourites Brazil have squads jam-packed with men on £100k+ weekly salaries, holding domestic and continental titles to add to those won with their national teams.
It is, however, a question of what English players do with the money, and what British celebrity culture allows money to bring.
How could a team so dominant and successful in qualifying - remember, England beat Croatia 4-1 away and 5-1 at Wembley - turn into a damp squib of a side incapable of beating the United States (who are pretty good, nothing more) and Algeria (who are rubbish), before greeting a nervy, single-goal win over Slovenia with relief and joy?
From their teens, successful English players are given the cash that is warranted, we are told, by their ability to entertain and generate profit. It’s the free market, capitalism at its purest - although given the fragile financial state of many of our clubs, this model is not without question.
It is near impossible for young players to remain level-headed: unlike most European countries, the United Kingdom’s school leaver’s certificate is taken at the age of 16, not 18. Players abroad are not given first-team contracts until they have completed their education and spent a year or two in the U19 or reserve sides. Cases in hand - Thomas Mueller and Mesut Ozil. All ze Germans in fact.
Anyone with any knowledge of teenagers will appreciate the jump in maturity taken by young men in their late teens, and as it stands we are giving boys with little sense of responsibility tens of thousands of pounds a week for a half-day shift that is, in real terms, a lot of fun.
We have also developed - more than any other Western European nation - a culture that fosters ostentatious displays of wealth among people who either have little money or have recently acquired some: ‘bling’ is the much-touted term.
Then you throw in our frankly ludicrous, over- the-top-celebrity culture that fawns over the untalented for their twice-removed associations with the partially-talented, who associate with the mildly-talented to boost their own profiles.
Basically, most young English players think they are awesome. In reality, they often they are nothing more than decent. Which is the case the world over - only a gifted few can call themselves genuinely brilliant. English players have what (and who) they want, when they want. And we’re not even talking about the superstars…
The result is twofold.
The so-called ‘big’ players, representing their country on their days-off from top-level club football, who can just about handle a week of dry, continental focus in qualifiers but in the mid-term go stir-crazy when deprived of their VIP champers, souped-up motors and Playstation shoot-em-ups.
Spoilt, cosseted rich-kids who work well within a club set-up - where they can hide behind team-mates from Ghana, Spain, Argentina and Brazil and act as ‘local’ heroes to their fans - but who freak out when the buck stops with them. You know them as ‘the England team’.
The dozens of prospects who somehow regress in their twenties, failing to step up or believing their own hype, drifting into semi-obscurity as squad players or falling down the divisions. Players like Lee Bowyer, Jonathan Woodgate, Joey Barton, Nigel Reo-Coker, probably Micah Richards…The endless list of players who achieve at U21 level, scotching the theory that our players lack ability, but fail to grow into men until it is frankly too late.
It is fashionable to point at the number of foreign players plying their trade in the Premier League as being a factor for the malaise, but there is a similar proportion of non-Germans in the Bundesliga, while the lower percentage in Spain is a fudge from the number of Latin American players with Spanish passports.
It is all about attitude, mental strength and aptitude for tournament football. What makes a top club player does not necessarily make a top international player.
John Terry is constantly pushed forward as the only natural England captain - but why? Because he's a great leader for Chelsea? His club pay his wages - it is in his financial interest to be the alpha dog at Stamford Bridge.
Technically, his lack of pace is compensated for by his club team-mates Ricardo Carvalho and Alex: without Rio Ferdinand, England lack a quick centre-half, meaning Terry will be exposed time and time again.
Furthermore, winning tournaments is as much about team spirit and organisation as it is about technical ability. Having a man in the squad who reportedly sleeps with team-mates’ exes is not the best way to foster a close-knit gang mentality.
Wayne Rooney is a great club player because club seasons are dragged out over nine months and 50 plus games. He can smash them in against Hull, or even Milan, but when the pressure is on he has almost always crumbled, either by getting himself sent off, picking up an injury or - in this case - not even looking bothered.
There is also a question mark over his ego, his apparently recently-acquired belief that he is the 'man' and that his failings are simply the fault of those around him.
I could go on. But what is clear is that someone has to act.
Fabio Capello is undoubtedly a fine coach, one of the best in history. It is unfair to say he is solely at fault for England’s abject performance at this World Cup - he looks as confused as anyone when trying to translate their excellent form in qualifying to the shambolic display in South Africa.
But his style of management - meticulous preparation, dry unbending focus and the absence of distractions - does not wash with the so-called 'golden generation' of entitled but half-educated boy-men whose concentration spans are so limited that a week without a pint and a page three 'stunna' renders them hopeless.
There are two options
The first is to accept that Capello is one of the best in the business but that our 'best' have let him - and us - down. He may be stubborn and aggressive, but it has worked everywhere else and there is no reason it cannot work here - as long as he revolutionalises England’s selection policy, to exclude the spoilt, the unpatriotic, the mentally fragile.
Psychometric testing, perhaps.
He must build a team of young, developing players who will gain confidence from U21 success and grow into a squad united by a common goal, moulded by the master in his image.
He needs to change the yardstick of success and ability in English football and to convert its success at junior level to the senior international stage. To cut adrift the old guard, force Rooney to earn his place in the squad and build a team around the likes of Joe Hart, Jack Rodwell, Adam Johnson and Jack Wilshere, a team of intelligent, focused, mobile players with good technique and modest automobiles.
The second is to accept that, as a footballing nation, we are effectively a bunch of morons and give the job to someone who can manage the egos and maybe take them to the quarters. Someone who can be the players’ boss, dad and mate, someone they like and not fear.
Unfortunately Harry Redknapp wised up several years ago - he now prefers foreign players.
Comment 71 - 90 of 90
two words some up Engurlund.... money grabbers... Premier League? Johnnie foriegner League more like... at least us Scots admit were cr#p but Engurland are so far up themselfs its laughable
Reda, I am not sure whether you are the most popular or the most unpopular guy among the players in England right now for writing this, but you are spot on. Hopefully some of the blokes will read this and wake up.
Ego managing skills?
I would have made them earn their place on the bench.
"It is the club scene which is the heart of the game for the committed." Yeah, well it SHOULDN'T be, Lancashire exile. This is precisely why i am launching this campaign. It should be the focal point, the peak, of the season whenever there is a major tournament for the national team. It should be every players ultimate ambition to play in it. Like finely tuned, profesiosnal atheletes this is what they should be peaking for, not running around week in weke out with overs-zed egos and paypackets and satisfying their mafioso club owners and greedy pigs at the FA, scamming the dimwited British public by pay-to-view TV packages and extortionate merchandize. So...
BOYCOTT THE PREMIER LEAGUE. The FA have an interest only in lining their own pockets, the maggot mafioso foreign owners, agents and businesses, the over-paid players themselves – but not in nurturing home-grown talent.
If you’re English, you need to do these 3 things:
DO NOT WATCH ANY PREMIERSHIP GAMES ON TV NEXT SEASON – and most definately don't pay to view!
DO NOT BUY A TICKET FOR ANY PREMIERSHIP GAME.
DO NOT BUY ANY ASSOCIATED MERCHANDISE.
If enough people do these things for a year, the FA and clubs might just have to do SOMETHING about the state of our national game.
If you don’t, well…
44 years of hurt? - you'd better get used to another 44.
Perhaps this result was inevitable and needed to happen. Too long have mediocre results been excused for a variety of reasons. But two things have become obvious at last
(1) Playing for your country is different in fundamental ways to playing for your club. Money and the thought of injury may well loom larger in the minds of some players than the honour of representing ones country. which should by rights surpass all other reward.
(2) National teams which play with the pride and passion resulting from that honour can and do often outperform teams with far greater natural talent but lacking in passion.
And theres the rub! The England team has buckets of talent despite what many commentators are saying
but no passion. They just dont understand the honour and responcibility attached to the wearing of the shirt.
They just dont get it - that we the supporters are fired with that passion to win and we expect then to be equally passionate. Do they never look at the TV pictures and see our faces. See what it means to us.
It is interesting that Martin Johnston the National Rugby Team head coach had the same problems with his team and he stated in the media that some players were not putting in the required effort. He is now starting to get results.
Sorry Mr Writer, the Algerians were not rubbish as you deem it. They were supberb and skillful and out played your stars. They problem at stake with England Team is not money but age is t elling on most of them. Anyway, thanks for your contribution
There have been so many things said about what's the difference between England and Germany in terms of national football. Here's my two cents, although I do not claim this to be a coherent argument (and yes, it's from a German perspective)
1) The English national team is often less than the sum of its parts. The German national team is often more than the some of its parts.
2) In advance of a great tournament, the English media usually play up the chances of their team, the German media usually play down the chances of theirs.
3) The English consider the Germans their arch-rivals in football. The Germans consider the Dutch their arch-rivals in football.
4) The English media talked about the 5:1 in Munich as if was the a substitute for a long draught in not winning the cup. The 1:5 loss never figured prominently in the German consciousness, e.g., nowhere near the 2:3 against Austria in 1978.
5) Early exits in tournaments prompt a soul-searching in England about not only what's wrong with their football but also whats wrong with their country or society (see above). In Germany, just triumphs are used as political metaphors, losses are generally only talked about in terms of sports.
6) The English refer to the long streak of successes for Germany's football. The Germans can't stand the fact that its been 14 years since they won the EC and 20 years since they won the WC.
7) The English find it amusing to mention the war when it comes to fotball match-ups with Germany (if less o than in earlier years). The Germans find it amusing that the English find that amusing.
simple get rid of the old and in with the new,,capello should stay.
he at least deserves a chance to finaly choose his team and not what the englsih public say he should choose,,as they do,,,stick gerard in behind rooney blah blah blah
does it work no ,end of...
What a lot of ludicrous over-reactions. I agree that even our better players are probably a little short of technical ability and perhaps pace when competing with the best but to suggest there is some kind of ethno-cultural deficiency or a wealth induced lack of motivation and effort is frankly ridiculous. In the first place all of these English footballers have been brought up and immersed in exactly the same febrile ethnocentricity evidenced in most of the comments and the original article; in short they too buy into the chauvinistic sense of inherent English potential for superiority and the expectation of overcoming the rest of the world. They do play for the shirt because they believe in it. the problem is that other countries have good players too and in the case of some of them rather more than we have. It isn't surprising that Germany produces good teams. They have a bigger population base and football is just as much at the centre of popular culture in Germany as it is here. So we shouldn't necessarily expect to beat them although we do on enough occasions that we shouldn't regard last Sunday's result as historically definitive. The same argument applies to Brazil, Argentina, Italy et al.
As a regular at Premier League games, along with most of my fellow season ticket holders and from what little I hear at other PL clubs we are not surprised at the outcome nor especially concerned by it. Not surprised because we see week in and week out the strengths and weaknesses of International players. We could have told you that Johnson is a poor defender or that Barry and Terry are ponderous movers or that Upson's club performances suggest an accident waiting to happen. Not concerned because this is a big event now but it will drift from public consciousness as the interest amongst occasional watchers fades and other moral panics take its place. It is the club scene which is the heart of the game for the committed.
Finally, somebody who dares to say it the way it actually is rather than taking part in the ritualistic manager-bashing that inevitably follows every tournament debacle. I won't dwell on the attitude, concentration, motivation and organisational problems that were so evident in their diabolical footballing displays but rather on something more fundamental and innate - the technical ineptitude of the English players as a whole. Barring some individuals who are actually comfortable holding, controlling and passing the ball (Joe Cole, Gerrard, Lampard and Rooney), the majority of this team are woeful. Even then, a truer test of the likely success of this team on the international stage is whether they can translate their 'domestic prowess' into holding, controlling and passing the ball (let alone dribbling) under pressure and against the best in the world. Even the likes of Gerrard and co were found wanting, not being able to complete nor compete. (long balls don't count) I would even take issue with the often quoted reference to 'world beaters'. On what basis are we making this claim? Because our 4 best teams - Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool regularly go a long way in the Champions League? And that is courtesy of their abundant and dominant English players and English managers of course, right? Don't underestimate the level of input and influence the foreign players are making on proceedings. If England wants to start competing on the international scene then it has to addressing its technical shortcomings. Copy the Europeans if you must but drop the long ball, the 'safe' passing that goes backwards and the fear of making mistakes that is a uniquely English trait that is instilled from an early age and which stifles creativity and flair.
There are many problems with English football. One of them is that there are too many "experts".
These people , write, photograph and talk nonsense.
Unknown people are given a microphone to commentate on the match. Suddenly they become qualified to talk about which tactics should be used by Paraguay, or North Korea etc etc.
80% of the time is spent talking about an incedent that has already taken place. Then they seem unable to get over a minor error by a goalkeeper. As soon as one side scores, they then talk up the team and ignore completely the other team.
They have never played the game. How does the crossbar stop a goal being scored ? It also stops a goalkick !
If a player hits the post, the opposing team has been "saved" by the post . But if a goalkeeper pushes the ball onto a post, it becomes a wonderful save ??
This morning, there was a report on TV about the England squad arriving at Heathrow. A good shot of the team leaving the aircraft looking suitably sad. But when Wayne Rooney appeared , the camera followed him into the building. So the rest of the squad didn't exist.
NoneIn my opinion, of these media experts contribute anything good to the game.
how about putting an englishman in charge then maybe things might change for the better.lets face it why should someone outside of england care if we win or not...
Trouble with the english team is that they cant be told what to do because other wise they will throw ther toys out there pram, cause they cant get there own way. Spoilt brats all the fans that saved hard to watch them in the world cup had to work hard for that privilage not like the boys trying to play.
Unless the pay is worked out better ie, on performance, play well get paid, cant be bothered then dont pay them.
All the fans should boycott the next few games and see if they like it.
Nonses all of them.
I'm sorry but the media had a lot to do with hyping the England team to the max, and getting everyone's hopes up. When in reality there's more chance of BP's scum bag boss Tony Hayward keeping his promise of clearing every drop of oil up than England even getting a glance at winning the World Cup.
What motivation can these players have to win.? they have everything they want and i dont think for one minute that they have any honour, to support their country as their country supports them. a team of overpayed individuals that play better against each other rather than with.
perhaps the problem with englands FA and its managers is they are all hung up on chooseing big name premiership footballers, that for their clubs play their hearts out, mostly,
when any championship player would have tried there hardest, run down any ball, defended to the last that piece of honour that they would have from the right to represent their country and in their countrys colours.
leave cappelo alone, He is not at fault for haveing to play these ego maniacs on the field.
Players are only the best when they want to prove that they are the best. premiership names have what they want already.
ENGLAND EXPECTED TO WIN WITH THEIR PRIMO DONNAS but THE GERMANS WANTED IT MORE.
we are better player as a team.
ENGLAND WOULD LOVE A PLAYER LIKE PER MERTERSACKER
coventry, london, turin, bloemfontein .....
i dont agree with everything said by this chap, but i totally agree with the core of his opinion - the society our English boys inhabit, their physocoligal state because of it and the way they are held in awe by the worringly large proportion of the british that are morons (and in my opinion this is almost soley down to the fact they are loaded and can afford luxury cars and homes that media driven capitalism would have us believe is the only way to really live) is the reason why we didnt turn up at the world cup.
i hope Capello stays - give him 4 years to ring the changes and lets see how we get on in the Euros in 2.
first reda, correct the spelling of your name. it's "rida mahir". typical arab ignorance of english. let's reboot. mor school level talent spotting. complete overhaul of premier ship. break up the FA.
First, we can not blame Capello. Capello is a fine coach amongst fine coaches. Instead of blaming the manager why not take some time and look at our players as a team. Maybe that can help us to improve. We can not improve or go any further before we realise that we are not good enough to play as a team. Germany can change their team at any time and still be world contenters. The Germans do not talk about individuals players like we do, they talk about a team. What does that tell us before we go any further? It tells us that we are a bunch of disfunctual team made up of a collective individuals who cant play together. When are we gonna wake up and realise that we need to learn to play as a team, that should be the first stage to improve. When was the last time we played like Brasil or Spain etc, talking about ball control, keep the ball(ball posession), pass the ball, and other technicals which improve players as a team and not individuals. Yes we have world class players but what good is it when they cant play as a team. Its time we be critic to players and see how we can produce quality as a team rather critisise managers only. Look at Slavakia, slovenia, japan, usa, serbia etc who are they? nobody but they played far better than the so called world class England! they dont have world class players but they play as a team. We need to be critic to our selves inorder to move on. We cant take any critisism but quick to critisise other teams and managers. We can have the most talented and the best manager in the whole world, and still remain the same. Until we recognise that we are not good as we say we are there wont be any change in english team. look the whole team cant pass and even do a simple thing like stop the ball! what a shame to us! the Germany kids taught us how to play football we invented what a shame to us! COULD IT BE THAT OUR PLAYERS APPEARS TO BE GOOD IN ENGLISH LEAGUE BECAUSE THEY ARE HELPED BY VERY GOOD FOREIGN PLAYERS
My observation in Sunday's match was that players were not backing each other up. When an English player had possession, none of his team-mates were moving but expected the ball to be passed to them. In distinct contrast, whenever a German player had the ball, there was movement around the player and generally had at least two options in passing.
So what does this indicate? The players were not playing as a team! Therefore, the issue is why this was so? Perhaps you are right and they are overpaid and spoilt. Or, perhaps, there was a lack of team spirit. This is the manager's fault. The best teams win not a collection of good players!
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account