McLaren deny new engine deal

Mon, 30 Jan 16:25:00 2012

McLaren have played down contacts with Formula One's planned new engine maker Pure amid lingering speculation about the Mercedes-powered team's future supplier.

McLaren driver Lewis Hamilton of Britain steers his car during the qualifying for the Indian Formula One Grand Prix at the Buddh International Circuit in Noida, - 0

"McLaren has had absolutely no contact with Pure for many months," a McLaren spokesman said.

"Moreover, the contact we did have with Pure, many months ago, was of an entirely informal nature, and was merely a courtesy gesture."

Italy's Gazzetta dello Sport newspaper reported that Pure, led by Jacques Villeneuve's former manager and team boss Craig Pollock, had been sounded out as possible replacements for Mercedes after a new V6 1.6 litre turbo engine is introduced from the start of 2014.

McLaren's former shareholders Mercedes have sold their stake in the team since buying 2009 champions Brawn GP and renaming them Mercedes GP.

The Mercedes deal allowed McLaren free engines until the end of 2012 and then a supply until at least 2015 at the going rate of around 8 million euros a year.

McLaren have also been linked to Honda, who powered them to titles with the late Brazilian Ayrton Senna and Frenchman Alain Prost between 1988 and 1992, but the team said in November those reports were wide of the mark.

McLaren managing director Jonathan Neale said at the time that the team, who have champions Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton as their drivers, were entirely focused on the relationship with Mercedes.

Reuters

Comment 21 - 40 of 40

Sort comments by: Most recent | Most rated
  1. Must be my supporters doin' the thumbing lol,now be­ a good boy and toddle off before you knock yourself­ out.

    From Wizzo, on Wed 1 Feb 5:16
  2. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    It looks like hidden touronroute or wizzo are thumbing­ me down but it's been nice without them tonight.­
    F1 fan here.

    From Spike A, on Wed 1 Feb 4:46
  3. v6 1.6 TURBO, a wet dream for Honda, wait and see.

    From iluvrenandstimpey, on Tue 31 Jan 23:06
  4. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    Decent F1 fans. All i'm trying to do is get rid of­ touronroute, wizzo and their multi ids. They insult,­ threaten, talk b@llocks and act so high and mighty­ you'd think they own the pages.
    You can all help­ here. Any post by the resident idiots can be thumbed­ down.
    I will cancel my (silly piss take id) when these­ F1 pages are full of the genuine fans.
    Unite and fight­ the resident idiots please and return some sanity to­ these pages.
    Thankyou for reading my post and let's­ hope we have a good safe F1 season.
    A F1 fan for over­ 35 years.

    From Spike A, on Tue 31 Jan 22:47
  5. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    Williams FW14b as I say you know #uck all, Ferrari­ along with Mercedes will have their own ride­ height­­ suspension already for the first race and it will not­ be controlled by no silly piston as you seem to think,­ ask Aldo Costa what he has just brought here to­ Brackley an Idea from Ferrari.
    Domenicalli sent the­ F.I A a dummy Williams FW14b, they never had the­ intention of using a (CONTROLLED reactivated ride­ height suspension.

    From touronroute., on Tue 31 Jan 19:13
  6. @victordinusa
    they will have acces to mercedes engines,­ but they will not be the main partner (and implicitily­ the only ones benefiting from the shared experience and­ know how), which is what they really want. i understand­ them not being very happy about it, but what are their­ choices really, if they want to continue their­ competitive form? as i have seen in a comment, BMW (if­ they decide to return) could be a nice choice,­ Volksvagen (in the same wishfull thinking spirit),­ Honda...... ferrari engines will damage the reputation,­ and will have effects (commercially), renault already­ provides enough teams, cosworth - not up to their­ standards just yet, and P. U. R. E. , well, a new born­ with youths inherent problems

    From Sinfull, on Tue 31 Jan 19:05
  7. hey asssident #29 someone at ferrari gave that data to­ mclaren it was not stolen THAT IS A FACT . do i need to­ remind you who was at the center of all of that @#$% ?­ just in case your memory is still faulty it was the­ crybaby alonso

    From barry w w, on Tue 31 Jan 18:53
  8. "...but­ Ferrari never even sent nothing for­­ approval anyway, so­ that is a load of bull for a­­ start." touronroute., on Sat 28 Jan­­ 8:28PM
    Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali said­­ at the team's media Wrooom event in Italy on­­ Wednesday that there had been correspondence with the­­ FIA over the matter. "What you are talking about,­­ is more related to having stability under­­ braking," explained Domenicali. "It is a­­ system that I know there have been some documents in­­ writing between the FIA and the teams. We are waiting­­ for the final confirmation if this kind of devices­ will­ be acceptable or not. But for sure we are­ looking­ around these sorts of devices to see if they­ contribute­ to a performance. But we need to wait and­ see what will­ be the reaction to the FIA on­ that." Stefano­ Domenicali
    Ferrari has own­ reactive height system Thu,­ 12 Jan 11:51:00­ 2012

    Panicked by this damning evidence that­ contradicts his own claim, touronroute subsequently ­ turns into 'robben' and then comes out with:­

    We are­ waiting­ for the final confirmation if this­­­ kind of­ devices will­ be acceptable or not "­­­
    Does not­ mean they have that device does­­­ it.
    'Robben', on Sun 29 Jan­­­ 9:07AM
    "Ferrari has own reactive height­­­ system" Clues in the headline, moron.
    Williams­ FW14b, on Sun 29 Jan 1:24PM

    In this post, robben/­ touronroute claims to know more about Ferrari than­ Domenicalli, if he's any more deluded tou-bag­ will end up badly photo-shopping a picture of himself­ (complete with own light source) into a photo of Rossi.­ Oh wait....
    I am at man enough to draw a line under­ this whole argument. Starting...NOW.

    From Williams FW14B, on Tue 31 Jan 18:29
  9. they could make thier own engine.

    From Tam, on Tue 31 Jan 17:05
  10. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    jjjones10000 @17. Racist I am not. Why would you say­ that, just because I cant stick the sight of a certain­ (cry baby) racing driver..
    Well I am not the only one­ believe me. I have met and see the other side of a­ person and have great pleasure year after year in­ reminding him of treatment given to the less­ unfortunate.
    Well as for the RIBS argument it has­ nothing to do with me, but I can understand why the­ arguments carry on. Well like you say this a F1 forum,­ so please tell the others that RUN from the discussions­ they have started and go onto something else because­ they get tied up with fellow posters who know more than­ they do.
    Williams for one knows sweet fanny all about­ anything.

    Touronroute. Silverstone

    From touronroute., on Tue 31 Jan 16:47
  11. It will be Honda, no doubt about that.
    Nothing's­ gonna change that.

    From Ice, on Tue 31 Jan 16:29
  12. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    At some point Mclaren will need a new engine supplier.­ instead of stealing information from Ferrari, all they­ have to do is order an engine from the same Ferrari.­ Simple.

    From axxxident, on Tue 31 Jan 14:14
  13. jjjones10000@
    Actually. I was referring to your­ suggestion that it would be a drain on Williams­ resources, it will cost little; if any more, than the­ Cosworth engine.
    And remember Williams are the only­ team to manufacture their own KERS. So they cant be­ that hard-up EH?

    From walkin quiet, on Tue 31 Jan 12:13
  14. vw

    From Larry, on Tue 31 Jan 9:15
  15. @walkin.quiet,
    Yes Engine prices have never been­ cheaper and I believe we owe that to Max "I love­ being spanked" Mosley, but we would leave that­ discussion for another day.
    I am sure it is not about­ the money for McLaren but so far that seems to be the­ only reason I can imagine that would make McLaren jump­ ship for a possible free engine!!!

    From jjjones10000, on Tue 31 Jan 8:52
  16. It's only a matter of time until McLaren no longer­ have access to Mercedes engines. Setting aside the­ nostalgia associated with Honda, wouldn't it be­ interesting to see BMW jump back in as a motor supplier­ to challenge their national rival. It wasn't so­ long ago when they were the strongest motor on the­ grid. The R&D involved could serve their street­ cars as well.

    From victordinusa, on Tue 31 Jan 8:26
  17. $8m isn't a huge deal for McLaren, but it's 8­ million more than all the other big teams are­ spending.
    That could prove to be vital R&D money in­ the championship race late in the season.

    From Chris, on Tue 31 Jan 7:38
  18. It would have been nice to see Mclaren Hondas and­ Williams Renaults back on the grid. Mclaren could have­ even gone back to white and red livery for the hell of­ it. Oh well...

    From Williams FW14B, on Tue 31 Jan 6:41
  19. eheem.practice what you preach andrew! on another­ note,have to agree with barry @ post3 .ANYTHING­ involving Craig Pollock. will be a disater.

    From dandare1799, on Tue 31 Jan 6:21
  20. i tend to agree #12 V for Vandetta, people try to keep­ a lid on these sorts of things but with the rules­ changes forthcoming for 2014 teams would be foolish not­ to start negotiations and research as to who may­ provide the best equipment. They certainly are not­ going to start throwing away free engines for 2012 but­ you can bet come June of 2013 the McLaren will probably­ be looking a lot different ahead of the 2014 season.

    From ericmueller1971, on Tue 31 Jan 6:16
Sort comments by: Most recent | Most rated

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account