Champions League - Chelsea to appeal UEFA bans

Eurosport - Tue, 30 Jun 09:16:00 2009

Chelsea are to appeal the "unnecessarily harsh" punishments handed out by UEFA in the wake of their controversial Champions League semi-final defeat.

FOOTBALL Chelsea striker Didier Drogba hassles referee Tom Ovrebo at the end of the Champions League semi-final exit to Barcelona - 0

European football's governing body banned striker Didier Drogba (pictured right) and right-back Jose Bosingwa for four and three matches, respectively, with other games suspended.

The punishment was meted out for their comments in the wake of the 1-1 second-leg draw with Barcelona at Stamford Bridge in May which sent them out of the competition.

Drogba's foul-mouthed rant at the official was captured by watching millions on live TV.

The Ivorian stunned the worldwide audience by shouting "It's a f****** disgrace" straight at the cameras. He later apologised for his behaviour.

Bosingwa was banned for labelling Tom Ovrebo (pictured left) a "thief" in an interview - words he later retracted.

But he too will miss a large chunk of Chelsea's Champions League group stage unless the club can get the suspensions reduced on appeal.

The club also received a fine of £85,000 for the improper conduct of their players and for the throwing of missiles by their supporters.

PA Sport

Comment 62 - 81 of 101

Sort comments by: Most recent
  1. Unbelievable ARROGANCE from CFC. The Ref was poor as we­ all know, but the behavior of their players was truly­ childish and the bans are pathetically lenient and the­ fine a total joke, and why wasn't Ballack in the­ dock too?
    Reading the Chelsea fans' comments sums­ up what a sad state football has become. I've been­ more inclined to watch the egg-chasers in recent times,­ but now it appears that some countries think thuggery­ is ok, so maybe not. Is there anyone out there who­ wants to compete in a "sport"?

    From jonathan.stewart63, on Tue 30 Jun 8:00AM
  2. to you jameslan01............................comment ­ 72...
    people should be very cautious with what they­ write or say about others and i dont think for any­ reason, Drogba should be desribed as APE .....this is­ just a matter of football or you`ve got other scores to­ settle with Drogba. what will be your reaction if i­ likened you to a PIG....grow up man

    From jyde, on Tue 30 Jun 7:40AM
  3. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    It was justice that prevailed, Chelsea under Guus bored­ world football with 180 minutes defending. They started­ defending before even stepping on to the Nuo Camp. With­ all respect, Guus Hiddink is a good manager/coach but­ he is used to coaching little teams hence all the­ defending and even lock out. The chances they had were­ all because the other team was trying to perforate a­ bunch of people kicking the ball out. Chelsea never­ constructed one single attack. The Essien goal was a­ wonderfully struck shot but even there it was lucky how­ the ball ended on his path in the first place. How many­ goals did essien score like that? You can expect it­ from Lampard but not from Essien who in my opinion is­ the best defending midfielder. Chelsea didn't any­ penalties to go through, they just needed someone to­ finish off Barca at that stage. In saying all this I­ have to say that for the good of football, Barca gone­ through with a fantastic strike from Iniesta.

    From Matthew, on Tue 30 Jun 7:32AM
  4. i wait to see the outcome of this appeal if the­ dissission is changed at all would be a travisty­ football today is a game of three parts football and­ the antics of some of the players getting players sent­ off and a wink or nod to the bench of the harrasing of­ the officials including foul language. the culture in­ football now includes attacking the officials for every­ dissission right or wrong it would be a radiacal move­ to book any player who questioned a referee or showed­ desent, but we all know if that was implemented you­ would have less than 5 players on the field before half­ time. IT's a better man than me­ "Gunggerdin" who has the answers to the­ playing just footbaal for 90 minutes.

    From ALAN T, on Tue 30 Jun 7:13AM
  5. Harsh? He was lucky his punishment didn`t get worse! I­ do agree that the referee did wrong decisions but still­ your not meant to fight him/Take the micky. He should­ have had a bigger ban for what he did.

    From Nath, on Tue 30 Jun 6:53AM
  6. This is idiocy of the highest order, this Ovrebo guy­ has been let to go lose after officiating a match like­ a 14 year old teenage girl. This Ovrebo is the man to­ be BANNED, not drogba. OVREBO should be banned from­ officiating any matches for the next 6 months, and­ during that period he should go back to refereeing­ school or wherever they teach them how to officiate.­

    Secondly, can people stop this nonsense, that drogbas­ comments were a bad example to children worldwide!­ Thats bull.s.h.*t! What of Ovrebos judgments? What do­ they teach those kids? That its good to be unfair? Fifa­ and Michelle Platini should wake up and smell­ themselves before pointing fingers at players.

    From Batiany, on Tue 30 Jun 6:36AM
  7. In the end, Chelsea only have themselves to blame for­ losing that game. Despite the missed calls from the­ ref, the fact is they had the lead with a man­ advantage. Guus Hiddnik made a tactial mistake (a­ common one at) for dropping back in the last 25 mins­ which allowed Barca space and the opportunity to score.­ If they had kept attacking, Chelsea would have won­ that game, no doubt.

    From Mark V, on Tue 30 Jun 6:09AM
  8. UP CHELSEA!!!

    From Ukeme, on Tue 30 Jun 6:00AM
  9. The bans are rightly deserved. There is absolutely no­ excuse for the behavior of Chelsea players after that­ game, no matter how controversial the ref was or how­ important the game was, absolutely no excuse. ­ Drogba's behavior in particular was disgraceful.­ They are a professionals and should act like a­ professionals, win or lose. Actually, the only Chelsea­ player who demonstrated true class and professionalism­ after that game was Frank Lampard. BTW, there was no­ UEFA controversy against Chelsea. Yes, the ref­ didn't award the so called penalities, but he also­ gave Barca an undeserved red card when Chelsea had the­ lead. Don't see how that's biased.

    From Mark V, on Tue 30 Jun 5:56AM
  10. Kim Whittaker-what about the Arsenal players the­ previous season when denied a stone bonk penalty at­ Ashburton Grove and then a dodgy one given against at­ Anfield in quarter finals against Liverpool-did they­ chase the ref about and swear at the tv cameras like­ demented little children? No.
    Who's the saddo now­ dear?
    All players should take a leaf out of the British­ Lions rugby team though-they accepted those bad­ decisions against them with hardly a whimper.

    From Lawrence, on Tue 30 Jun 5:39AM
  11. Comment hidden due to its low rating. Show

    Good place for all big and tall singles, please check:­ ---BigTalls Co M ---- ,More fun waiting for you...

    From milishaang, on Tue 30 Jun 3:12AM
  12. JIMMYRICE, wud u cop on to urself. "Drogba giving­ his all", Are u joking me. If the cheating scumbag­ stayed on his feet he might have scored a chance or 2.­ Instead he was too busy cheating like he has done since­ joining the epl. The size of the muppet and he rolling­ around holding his leg half the game. He should be­ banned for a season. Wake up prat.

    From jamesl, on Tue 30 Jun 2:15AM
  13. I cannot get over all u rent boys whinging on here­ still. That ape drogba deserved what he got, bosingwa­ too, pity that german scum ballack didnt get what he­ was due. These boys think they can run the game, fair­ play to uefa for standing up to them. Im fed up of­ these stupid comments such as kim whittaker ' the­ ref was advised by uefa to rob chelsea '. Why dont­ u lot death threat this ref too and run him out of­ football. BITTER BITTER SORE LOSER SCUM!!!!!!!!

    From jamesl, on Tue 30 Jun 2:04AM
  14. It is time for FIFA to bring in technology and with it­ respect for the referees.
    1. There should TV cameras­ available for instant review for penalty area­ infractions.
    2. Only the Team captain has the right to­ challenge (three) a referees call and invoke the­ instant replay.
    3. Any kind of dissent shown by players­ should result in a Yellow card
    4. Any foul language­ used by players rat stage of the game results in a Red­ card

    From starman_123, on Tue 30 Jun 1:55AM
  15. I'm not a Chelsea fan, but I must say without a­ doubt that Chelsea did get the wrong end of the stick,­ and the refereeing was blatantly biased. Come on­ ManUre, Liverpuke and arse-anal fans admit that if your­ team was the the target of biased calls you would not­ be crying foul and defending the actions of your­ players? And what about your Managers who are never­ short on words after a game? If UEFA had any marbles­ they would look into root of this problem and have to­ wonder why would the Captains of two prominent national­ teams (Ballack and Terry) would chase after the referee­ and give them a mouthful. Having said all that Drogba­ and Bosingwa were wrong in what they did. The Chelsea­ players wrong in their actions after the game: Two­ wrongs do not make a right. Chelsea/Hiddink should have­ taken a page from SAF, Wenger, Benitez, Mourinhos book­ and called out the UEFA on the biased refereeing. It is­ time to get technology involved into this­ "business".

    From starman_123, on Tue 30 Jun 1:46AM
  16. This week's controvesy has been about Burger and­ his gouging and the rights and wrongs of his punishment­ .. in some ways he (IMHO) has brought Rugby Union into­ disrepute .. however, I am so pleased that I follow the­ oval ball code when I remember how the Boks reacted to­ the yellow card after 30 secs and how the Lions­ didn't pester the ref to send him off (red card) -­ when you see the likes of Drogba, Ballack etc. who earn­ more than the entire Lions team put together acting­ like spoilt kids - you suddenly realise that perhaps­ there is more to sport than the money and the glory ...­

    On a related note - so sad to see de villiers­ actually attempting to condone the action with his - if­ ya wanna dance bye a tutu comment - now if anything­ brings a game into disrepute then it will be purile and­ assinine comments such as that ..

    From Andy M, on Tue 30 Jun 1:34AM
  17. UEFA finally do something right. About time the­ FA/Premier League took a similar stand against the­ prima donna 'top clubs' who think they are­ bigger than the sport.

    From John, on Tue 30 Jun 12:44AM
  18. "unnecessarily harsh"
    ,,
    It was­ "unnecessarily harsh" For Ballack to always­ chase the ref and man handle­ him.
    ,,
    "unnecessarily harsh" For­ Drogba's disgrace mouthful
    ,,
    "unnecessarily­ harsh" For nearly the whole team to surround the­ ref and have him to be escorted off the­ pitch.
    ,,
    "unnecessarily harsh" For the fans­ to throw missiles at the ref.
    ,,
    Be a team Chelsea, one­ that kids van be proud of, not one like the old days of­ the firms.

    From james, on Tue 30 Jun 12:29AM
  19. 62 your arte wrong about the handball rule and probably­ more if your arm/hand is above your head it's­ deemed as handball ! think again

    From handyandyisalways, on Tue 30 Jun 12:03AM
  20. 60 you talk like you are a great authority ! i doubt it­ very much jealous boy

    From handyandyisalways, on Tue 30 Jun 12:00AM
Sort comments by: Most recent

Not already a Yahoo! user ? to get a free Yahoo! Account