Eurosport - Tue, 30 Jun 16:23:00 2009
With the Lions' chances of a series victory now over, Lions Watch examines a number of decisions and issues that affected the tourists' hopes of repeating their success of 1997.
After the epic contest in Pretoria last weekend, it seems somewhat self-defeating to consider what might have been had the Lions' selectors and management done things differently.
After all, we were treated to one of the most compelling Test matches of all time. It was skilful, it was brutal, it was nerve-shredding - it was pure sporting theatre.
To a man, the players can hold their heads up high for producing an occasion that will long remain in the memory - well, every player bar Schalk Burger maybe.
But that will be of little consolation to a Lions squad that came close on consecutive weekends to downing the world champions. The Lions have now lost seven consecutive Tests and that is unacceptable, no matter how many odds are stacked against them.
Whether you think the Lions could or should have won the series, the fact remains they didn't and irrespective of next weekend's outcome there are a number of issues that will be addressed in the tour post-mortem.
Selection
There is no exact science to picking squads and teams, but it is clear the Lions got it wrong on several counts. Tom Croft's exclusion from the original tour party was the first glaring mistake as he went on to play a leading role in the first two Tests, while the composition of the front row in Durban was arguably the most costly.
South Africa props on this tour have been nothing to shout about, and Adam Jones showed in no uncertain terms that Tendai Mtawarira is by no means the finished article - despite his dominations of Phil Vickery a week earlier.
Jones and Matthew Rees should have started the first Test. When they did not, they then should have been brought on earlier when it became clear Vickery and Lee Mears were struggling so badly.
Simon Shaw's exclusion from the first Test was also a mistake, as the veteran proved when he produced one of the great Lions performances last weekend. The Wasps lock was immense and got the better of his opposite number and Boks' enforcer Bakkies Botha, which is no mean feat.
Why also was Ronan O'Gara on the bench in Pretoria? Not just because he produced the clumsy challenge that conceded the crucial penalty, but because the Irishman is hardly the player to make an impact.
Ian McGeechan and co should have opted for the versatile James Hook to cover at fly-half, full-back and centre. Indeed, Hook has such an elegant running game he could probably make a decent fist of playing on the wing as well.
It is easy to point out selection errors in hindsight, but games are won and lost on such decisions and, with both Tests being so tight, they ultimately cost the Lions their chance of a series win.
Tour opposition
With the South Africa squad wrapped in cotton wool and 'saved' for the Tests, the Lions were denied a level of opposition that would have prepared them better for the Springboks.
One only has to look at the first 10 minutes of the first Test to see how shell-shocked they appeared by the increase in intensity, especially when they let Boks skipper John Smit stroll through for the softest of tries.
Had they been able to test themselves against the very best in South Africa, the Lions coaches would have had a clearer idea as to who was best able to cope with the Test challenges that lay ahead. Would, for example, Vickery have got the nod for the first Test had he come up against Mtawarira in the tour match with the Sharks?
Furthermore, would Mtawarira have been able to employ the questionable lifting tactics that allowed him to get the better of Vickery had the Lions been able to assess it earlier on tour?
Tougher opposition may have resulted in the Lions losing the odd provincial match, but conversely it would have given McGeechan a clearer idea of potential fault-lines, and in the Vickery case perhaps saved the first Test.
The weakened opposition also contributed to a lack of atmosphere and half-full stadia outside the Tests. The Lions squad and the many thousands of fans that made the trip from the UK and Ireland deserved better.
The Lions should use their clout to demand as much on future tours.
Figures from 2005 show that the Lions' 'brand' created £100 million for the New Zealand economy and will likely to do the same for South Africa. The Lions should make the most of their value and insist on a few ground rules ahead of future tours, including the home nations fielding their best players in provincial games.
Itinerary
It made no sense for the Lions to be based at sea level in Cape Town until the day before the second Test at altitude in Pretoria.
Opinions vary as the effect of altitude, but most athletes and coaches concur that it requires acclimatization and favours those used to the shortage of oxygen.
Is it a coincidence that the Lions seemed to tire in the final quarter of the second Test when the Boks bravely fought back for a remarkable win? Perhaps.
Certainly the Lions' cruel injury count did not help their chances, but where as in the first Test they finished strongly, in the second it was the Boks whose lungs seemed better equipped to see out the game.
Again using their economic value as a bargaining tool, the Lions should have had more say on their itinerary and made sure that, if anything, it was designed to improve their chances, not the home team's.
Surely it would have helped the Lions prospects to have been in camp in Pretoria for a week, rather than having to cope with a day's travel and an airport undergoing huge redevelopment for next year's World Cup. It makes no sense.
Refereeing
McGeechan said after the Durban defeat that the Lions had not had the "rub of the green" in the first two Tests. Most of the contencious decisions during the first two Tests are open to debate and will depend no doubt on whether you are a Lions or Springboks supporter.
But one incident that is beyond dispute was Schalk Burger's eye-gouging of Luke Fitzgerald.
Burger is one of the great Springboks and we must believe coach Peter de Villiers when he says the flanker is an honourable man. But cameras do not lie and when he was caught inserting his digits into the eyes of the Lions wing there is only one course of action open to the referee, first minute or not - red card.
It was a tough call for Christophe Berdos to make so early in the game and he rightly went to his assistant Bryce Lawrence, who was less than a metre away from the incident.
Lawrence and Berdos bottled it and awarded a yellow. Fact. Had Burger been given a red it is inconceivable the Boks would have been able to come back the way they did.
There is a growing belief that Lawrence also got it wrong while reffing the front row in the first Test. How can Mtawarira go from being such a force in Durban to being inconspicuous with his scrummaging a week later?
Were the Boks employing illegal tactics in their scrummaging? Lawrence did not think so and handed them nine points with his penalty count against Vickery.
It was also cruel coincidence that the video official that allowed Jaque Fourie's try in the 76th minute was the same that disallowed England wing Mark Cueto's effort against the Boks in the final of the last World Cup.
Did Stuart Dickinson have conclusive proof that no part of Fourie's body was in touch as he awarded the try? Tight lines indeed but again the Australian ruled in South Africa's favour.
- - - - - - - - -
Lions Watch is of the belief that South Africa deserved their series victory, just about. Overall, they won the physical battle and were superior when it came to finishing off their chances.
But there are a number of lessons to be learnt from the 2009 Lions tour and unless they are taken on board the Lions' chances of snapping their losing streak in 2013 will be remote.
Agree of disagree? Feel free to let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.
Comment 14 - 33 of 33
bosvark nou praat jy!!!! its difficult being the best.. all the critics not giving credit were credit is due. But its even more difficult being the a lion now. The match officials and world cup had nothing to do with the end result-a scrum would obviously not be as awesome if they only had 7 men ,tiring faster instead of 8!!! Only one's to blame are the one's pointing the most fingers! how can you expect to win the world champs if you can't keep you frustrations at bay.I think the lions showed they belong in the circus with all there tricks seeming rather impressive.At the end Im only messing with the okes reading this,coz few things are as scary as a wounded lion. beware
First of all Dickinson didn't need any proof in the Fourie 'incident'. The referee's question was "Is there any reason why I cannot award a try?" There was no evidence to say that Fourie was or wasn't in touch therefore the try stands. Mr Lawrence's handling of the first test was weak and at times laughable. Paddy O'Brien should not use these games as experiments. In my opinion many fast track referees are not up to the job at this level and contentious incidents are on the up for this reason. I would be very interested to see the assessor's report from that first test. Certain elements of this article, concerning selection and itinerary, are valid but in the end that is what coaches and organisers get paid for. The players get paid for playing and they did that and more. They made these tests two of the best I've seen for a long time and they have to be congratulated for that. Shalke Burger aside, both sides should be comended for their comitment, ability and talent and whatever certain antipodean commentators say I think that we have witnessed the two best sides in world rugby go head to head and the Sprinboks came out on top...just. Had there been a trouncing for either side then you can begin to apportion blame but the two test were so close that, in the end, the difference was the attrition rate. Great rugby!
Awww, I don't know about that Bren. I think you do a huge discredit to all the players on both sides.
I think we can all agree that Burger's behaviour was totally unacceptable. But to paint the whole Bok side (and indeed the whole nation, as seems to be the prevailing attitude on some of these blogs) with the same brush and choose rather to be blinded to the many positives of the tour, is just meanspirited and small. Maybe you will remember the tour for those negative things, and I genuinely feel sorry for you if you do.
I on the other hand feel that this has been a great Lions tour on so many levels, played with incredible intensity and commitment that has been so wanting in the North: its been a total trip, real edge-of-your seat rugby. The teams have been well matched, and but for the "rub of the green" the results could have easily gone either way. McGeechan and his players have restored the Lions pride since the 2005 tour debacle, and have rightly earned huge respect from the Bok faithful. New heroes in the form of Kearney, Roberts, Croft and Byrne to name a few, have shone. The Lions have matched and outplayed the Boks in many areas of the game. That is the true rugby spirit.
Burgers' madness aside, I see no difference in the physicality or intensity of rugby played in any of the other southern hemi tournaments (super 14 and tri N) that we see week after week after week.
You might as well label every Southern hemisphere side as "thugs" and never tour below the equator again.
this tour will be remembered only for the bad sportsmanship and cheating of the boks team:
You guys truely have a coach that reflects your attitude: You are a disgrace to the ideals of true rugby where winning although important takes second place to the spirit of sportsmanship.
Lets take the BIL away from these people and move it to a more sporting nation -- let this tour be the last the boks see of the lions,
What drivel. The only lesson to be learnt here is how to avoid blatant assault by certain players. I have always admired Springbok rugby, and it is a hard game in South Africa but if this is how the World Champs want to win, well, good luck to them but it's not what I call rugby. I can see that the Bok fans are on the defensive.... they know...
You must be kidding. The try in the world cup last year showed the foot of the England player touching the line. There was no evidence showing Fourie had been out of bounds. Stop trying to create issues when there are none.
Almost a carbon copy of the first Test, only roles reversed with Lions dominating for the first hour this time.
However the massive injury toll - both props, leading to uncontested scrums when the Lions were happy to take on SA this time, and one of them as a result of foul play from Botha which has cost him a place in the 3rd Test but more importantly a dislocated shoulder for Adam Jones - and the key centre partnership meant that they were unable to protect an 11 point lead in the final quarter.
O'Gara out of position at centre was not a match for Fourie, but still should have prevented his touchline try with 5 minutes left - then great kicks from Morne Steyn and Steven Jones left the game poised at 25-25 in the final 30 seconds.
To compound his error O'Gara then waded into Du Preez after his own high kick (he could have whacked it into touch and kept the series alive, it was very unlikely that he was going to create a score from his own 22) and left Steyn with a kick everyone watching knew he was destined to make.
Last week was hard to bear from a Lions perespective, but this weekend was a heartbreak, and a real shame that the SA win will be tarnished firstly by the eye-gouging of Burger, who should have left the field permanently, not just for 10 minutes (and has also been suspended) and the SA coach de Villiers, who scandalously has gone on record as not even thinking it was a penalty, just one of those things that happens in the game.
All that should not spoil what was a classic Test match, and one that showed that the concept of the Lions still has its place even in this ultra-professional era.
Lets try and salvage some pride on saturday by beating them.
Both teams played great rugby and it was sad to see a loser. Burger has always been a hard player and I would like to think he wouldn't intentionally hurt another player.
But it appears to have been reviewed and the correct decision made.Playing against 14 players would not have been the correct way to win either.
The Lions team have been exemplary and their leader an inspiration. They have given the world champions a tough fight and can hold their heads high in pride.
I think a fair commentary is that there was complete passion out there and no place to hide for any one. Were there dubious tackles - of course and from both sides. But don't forget that we sit and watch from the sidelines with the benefit of repeated slo mo replays and consider ourselves experts in the game.
The courage displayed by both the Lions and the Springboks resulted in a magnificent match and one to be remembered for many a year.
Imagine this tempo and passion around some of the EPL soccer players. Renaldo, Drogba (I am a Chelsea fan by the way so no bias here)and company would be terrified. They fall like flies when slightly brushed, so I cannot see them in any sort of company with these rugby players. And this from me, a soccer player and soccer nut who doesn't miss a match and played the game for 30 years!
We received trhe match from Setanta over here in Canada and I certainly hope that they survive and continue tom provide great sporting coverage.
I think the trouble is with the british press and their one sided reporting of the whole business stirring up sensationalism as usual. Dont report the facts just stir up the public into a frenzy. I love the way Bryan O Driscoll was concussed by a head blow. (that magically floated down from the heavens and landed on his angelic head.) No mention of Rossouw, not even a hope that he recoved! Gethin (one of my heros)tackled too hard (lets face it unneccessary because Habana is only little, and hurt himself. O Gara likewise except that he lost the game for the BIL. That leaves Adam and since I support Welsh rugby, we need him and I am as sorry as anyone else, but Botha was legally mauling at the time on his feet doing his job. All that leaves is the famous eye-gouging which has frankly been played to death, burger was cited and banned. end of story.
Twice now I have recorded games on Sky plus (the replay) as my boyfriend was working and twice its been censored. O Gara suddenly doesnt punch anyone and rossouw doesnt get carted off the field. mmmmm who are they protecting. Sky news and BBC news are one sided and biased. Why are they hiding the facts? I think both teams played a great game, as a south african, the boks were frustrating in the first half but the likes of karney, Stephen Jones Mike Phillips Jamie Roberts and co were brilliant, playing the ball as if they had played together for years. Sheridan and the captain were thugs through most of the game but thats what you expect from Rugby, hot tempers ect. Viva la Rugby. Anyone who thinks its disgraceful should find a nice girly sport.
De Villiers musst surely go. Burger, whom I have always admired, will llive in infamy -but for the coach to support such appalling behaviour means he has no right to coach a great team like the Boks. Same on you De Villiers!
McGuyver, the reason O'Driscoll didn't seem to use his arms in that tackle was that he was knocked out before he could complete the tackle. You should be inspired by the mans bravery and talent, not be disappointed in him.
Sheridan's jab was out of order alright but he had been putting up with a lot of hard stuff himself from Botha and others, they all wear cups now anyway so he prob hurt his knukles more than the other players knackers anywway!
I really enjoyed this tour. I think I and others are finding it tough to take because we could so easily be sitting on the other side of the fence...would of, could of, didn't.
Well done Boks, a mighty scalp for your collection.
To all the British and Irish Lions fans. Guys, aside from Burger's foul play, of which any South African would be embarrassed about, if you want to be the best team on the day, you need to beat 15 other players. Don't hope for the easy way out to beat 14 players, beat 15 Springboks if you can. Take it on the chin and be proud of the Lions, they played fantastically.
Don't moan so much boys, real men and rugby supporters don't cry when they lose. They get better and there is always a next time guys.
Well done Bokke!
Well Done SA the best team won on the day, You just need to look at the try count compared to the lions which tells you that they broke our defence way to many times.
But with that said, I do think Schalk Burger should of had a red card and a longer ban as he is a world class player who should be setting a better example to the younger generation of the game.
Well Done
It's a pity that rugby gets infected like this. Stiff upper lip? I don't think so, these days the fans just whine and blame. That is of course a generalization, since a few here remind me of my English buddy, who's about the coolest person I know. Personally I would have liked a draw in the second test. But when steel nerved Morne Steyn just slotted it I would be a liar if I said it wasn't a huge moment. I thought if Burger went off in the first minute, red card, that the whole match would have been a waste of time, and no victory in it for the BIL except on the scoreboard. Am I happy Burger has been banned? YES! Do I feel freakin frustrated with a player like that on our team? YES! How would you feel? (Maybe he'd be your hero, since no one seems to mention Sheridan and BOD's transgressions. Why's that?) Two reasons why Burger won't play anytime soon. 1.) Brussouw 2.) He's too risky. Now, talk about a waste of talent! Only a true rugby fan would feel the same. I loved watching the Lions. Their backline play was entertaining, their centres and full backs.. exceptional. I am a fan. But the journalist said they weren't given quality opposition. Maybe, but they still struggled... a lot... in the midweek games, and drew with Emerging Boks. I was dissappointed in BOD, Schalk and Sheridan. More so in BOD since I was a bigger fan of him than the other 2. I still am, but he's not the god he used to be. I think bigger factors in the Boks victories include their start in the first test (a shock to all), their self believe(most ex-world champs), and physicality. The decision making on the field has improved, which is scary. We won IN SPITE of De Villiers, Schalk giving away 10 points, a lot of missed kicks by Pienaar. I LOVED watching the crazy Lions fans, the energy on the field. I just hope that if we lose, we will take it with more 'stiff upper lip' than some BIL fans. For Chrismas we will post you De Villiers, although it
Well done South Africa, they showed us how to play. We lost because we did not over come the challenge of a world champion side. We selected Ugo Monye who runs down the right wing with the ball under his left arm - proving he is not a topclass winger. He got over the try line three times and never scored The two best wingers in the last six nations was left at home - Cueto and Lamont. We paid for it in the first test. Vickery should have been replaced after 20 minutes. It was obvious the ref was blaming him for the beast's indiscretions and he couldn't outwit/out play him. We had a good replacement for O'Driscall in the second test and we brought on the wrong sub. O'Gara should never have been on the bench - it should have been Hook. We had a team that could take the Springboks, but bad selection and itinery took its toll. The whole of South Africa were laughing saying that the itinery was so heavily weighted in South Africa favour.
All this talk about referees and wrong decisions will anything be done " A Big No" Stuart Dickenson will be in GB next Autumn and for the Six nations as will probaly be Bryce the bottle it Hamilton, Dickenson should stay in Australia he is probably the worst judge of decisions about.but will anything be done "NO" as for South Africa they caught us out not playing they best sides and also dictating, no respect will we do the same when they visit GB sadly another big "NO", as for DE - Villers he should be brought to task about his support for eye gouging and foull play, maybe Burger is honourable or is it he could not spell horrible
Terence O'Rorke (Writer of this article), Like any other brit, you should just accept defeat in the world of sport. You lost to South Africa in the 20-20 cricket, rugby world cup final 2007, and now the Lions Tour, I think it is time you gave up with all the excuses. I understand defeat is tough, but after living with it for several decades now, I would of thought you would be used to it. Stop trying to make excuses why you never won this sport or any other sport, stop blaming the ref, stop being bad losers. How about blaming your government, for some of the following reasons. If sport was compulsory in schools, parents raised their kids the way they should of been, and you all grew some balls. Southern Africa produces fine sportsmen, Mainly Zimbabwe and South Africa that is. All because they stuck to their roots! It all starts with Kids, and they way they are brought up. I think if you Brits got this part right, you would have near perfect sportsmen, as the United Kingdom has all the oppertunities and facilities. Come now, you played great on the past weekend, but give up the garbage talk. Maybe next time hey!
As a Welsh Rugby fan this has been enjoyable, even great series, both games could have gone either way, the illegal scrummaging did not cost us the first test it was management lacking the courage to change the front row after 30mins. Rugby has never been like Footbal blaming the refs, the side with courage and never say die attitude won the last test. S.Africa have been magnificent - that said Burgers behavior was Barbaric, and S.African managemnet supporting the tactics do nothing but bring the game uinto disripute and lower standarsd of our sport to unacceptable levels, and it takes away from the magnificent world Chapions you are
all rugby players are public schoolboys who were taught the ways of taking anal sex. thats about it really say no more
Please login to post a comment
Not already a Yahoo! user ? Sign up to get a free Yahoo! Account