Cow Corner

Anyone still doubting Cook in ODIs?

Alastair Cook brings up another ODI hundred, many convincedA captain's innings can mean a number of different contributions in different contexts, but there'll be few better examples than Alastair Cook's 137 in the first one-day international against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi.

Cook was fluent where others struggled, permanent where the rest came and went. He scored more than half of what England posted as a total — fitting, given that compared to his team-mates he looked twice the player.

The innings looked like propping up a competitive total — in the end, the 11 batsmen of Pakistan combined fell seven runs short of Cook's score.

On the eve of the series there were plenty who questioned Chef's place in this team on batting ability — Ian Botham was one of several high-profile pundits who left him out of their England one-day line-up — but that's because the memory of the pre-captaincy Cook persists.

Before he was given the armband Cook played 23 ODIs and averaged little over 30 at a ponderous strike rate of 68.

Since the captaincy? 19 ODIs, average of 52.52 at a strike rate of over 93. To put that in some context — since 2010, only Andrew Strauss (by 0.07 runs per hundred balls) has a better strike rate. His strike rate is only marginally worse than Sachin Tendulkar in the same time period. Celebrated dashers like Tillakaratne Dilshan and MS Dhoni score more slowly, as do titans of the game like Ricky Ponting, Kumar Sangakkara, and yes, even Jonathan Trott.

Sometimes the statistics do not tell the whole story, but here there's evidence enough. If England want to take another look at their batting, Cook's not the problem.

England certainly did not put all their woes behind them with victory — Saeed Ajmal continued to torment them with his unique brand of seemingly unreadable spin. He claimed five wickets for 43 runs as England lost their way. The Kevin Pietersen experiment at the top of the order failed this time, with KP slipping unconsciously into the role of anchor.

Trott was at the crease for just one ball — not quite long enough to be blamed by England fans for going too slow — while Eoin Morgan and Craig Kieswetter played innings that befitted men desperately short of form. It looked as if Ravi Bopara had been plucked straight from a job interview for the navy when he came to bat, so all at sea was the Essex man, but he showed courage to ride the waves of fortune and make a half-century. Without Cook, however, there would have been nothing to hold the innings together, and if he fails, the rest of the line-up could find themselves exposed by spin once more.

In the field England had more to celebrate as a team, with Steven Finn the stand-out performer.

Finn was Cook's best player on the eminently forgettable tour of India, and picked up where he left off there. His strength and fitness have improved - his pace, allied to a hint of movement under the lights, was too much for the Pakistanis to handle.

He can consider himself very unlucky that he isn't already in England's Test side, given he's a far more complete bowler these days than the man who already has 50 Test wickets to his name at an average of 27 — but any more performances of this calibre on pitches which don't appear to naturally favour his pace and bounce, and he will give the selectors a real dilemma.

The rest of the attack backed up that individual performance, with Samit Patel and Graeme Swann both accurate and persistent in the face of a gung-ho Shahid Afridi, and Stuart Broad and James Anderson bowling a nagging line which allowed Finn to attack.

England, who have been media-trained to talk up the positives in the darkest moments, can be pleased they have so many genuine reasons to be pleased.

They need to carry the momentum of a 130-run victory into the second game at Abu Dhabi on Wednesday, because the form book, in which England had arrived on the back of a 5-0 defeat in the ODIs and a 3-0 defeat in the Test series against Pakistan, suggests this result could easily prove a one-off.

Steven Finn celebrates

STAT OF THE DAY: Pietersen in ODIs before 2009: 78 innings, average 48.36, strike rate 87.58; since January 2009: 35 innings, average 24.85, strike rate 83.17 — as pointed out by @rajeshstats on Twitter. What makes Cowers think we'll be having the KP debate before the series is out?

TWEETS OF THE DAY: 'Like an England batsman trying to advance down the pitch, Bob Willis just attempted a smile then abandoned it as a bad idea' - @ECB_PR (note — not official PR suppliers of England cricket) see Willis break into what is not so much a smile but an ever-so-slightly mesmerising grin.

USER COMMENT OF THE DAY: "Any chance we could convince Ajmal to that he is eligible for an English passport?" — David asks the question the ECB may (not) have been analysing...

COMING UP: Let's do it all over again on Wednesday. The second of the four-match series starts at the same time - 11:00 GMT - and in the same place - Abu Dhabi. We'll be doing live text commentary as usual.

 

18 comments

  • Andy  •  Stevenage, England  •  3 months ago
    Well done England, you were fantastic today!!! :-)
  • Ollie Hunt  •  3 months ago
    "The Kevin Pietersen experiment at the top of the order failed this time, with KP slipping unconsciously into the role of anchor."

    I know he's not playing aprticularly well but he doesn't appear to be unconcious! Maybe slipping subconciously into the role of anchor...
  • John  •  Glasgow, Scotland  •  3 months ago
    In response to "User Comment of the Day" -- When did they start issuing English passports??
    • MARK 3 months ago
      When Salmond tricks you lot into independence probably
  • V for Vendetta  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    Doubt YES sorry but he is too variable in his play! If he was to score half centuries every game perhaps but.................................
  • Richard  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    I do not agree with IanH that England should clear out the overseas imports - that would mean losing Strauss, Trott, Prior too. We would be left with only Cook and Bell out of our top 7!
    If birthplace was important, we would not have had the services of the likes of Colin Cowdrey or Ted Dexter for example.
    We have always fielded imports in the English national team: Alan Lamb, Robin Smith, Tony Greig, Basil d'Oliveira etc in the fairly recent past, back to Tiger Pataudi and Ranjitsinji. Furthermore, if birthplace was a consideration, we would not have had the services of the likes of Colin Cowdrey or Ted Dexter for example.
    We should, however, select on the basis of form, which would indeed mean dispensing with Pietersen, Kieswetter and Morgan for the time being.
  • asn  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
    Good win :)
    Pakistan played poorly I hope they come back strong we dont want one sided series do we:)
    • Dean lfc aston 3 months ago
      yes please
    • P 3 months ago
      you be quiet St Albans, it can be as one sided as it likes to balance the deficit
  • alan  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    I don't doubt Cook, but Pietersen on the other hand.............. not impressed with him at all, seems intent on making money in the IPL rather than see out an innings. People say that when he is on fire he is brilliant. But he's hardly ever on fire, bring a new young batsman in and move him up the order.
  • Robert  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    You little devils so you can play cricket if asked nicely
  • craig  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    Great win but failings against spin was there again for everyone to see, Keiswetter has to open or not play, Petterson back to 3, drop Trott and bring in Bairstow or Buttler if fit, bowling was really good Finn is getting better all the time, the Aussie's go on about there good young bowlers but Finn is head and shoulders above anything they have at the moment, Broad and Anderson were a bit of but they will get better, Patel was a surprise his best bowling so far for England, need to keep it going know and get better because Pakistan will.
  • MSUNNYK  •  3 months ago
    England played well and this is the first time i ever in my life seen them played so hard.. they deserved that victory...whereas PAKISTAN also worked hard but could not manage to get hold of it going to be interesting series....
  • Ian H  •  Truro, England  •  3 months ago
    What a pointless article. Cook is about 9th in the list of the current first XI list of doubts. Why not start with Petersen, followed by Morgan, Kieswetter and all the rest of the overseas imports who seem to be guranteed a place but seem to get away with one performance per year. Kieswetters keeping is particularly ordinary.
  • P  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    you made it look easy well done more of the same please
  • Julian  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
    i agree the form is important as far as playing international cricket but cook was there and we won and we could have done better like this in the test matches too off form batsman like pietersen are not any good either
  • Richard  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    Good result!
    But let's not get carried away: apart from Ali Cook's innnings there was very little to choose between England and Pakistan
  • joe  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
    well done lads
  • Martin  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
    Grammar! Its NEVER compare to but always compared WITH so the sentence: "compared to his team mates" is poor English

    given that compared to his team-mates he looked twice the player.
  • Dean lfc aston  •  Stoke-on-Trent, England  •  3 months ago
    cook...ing with gas
  • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
    My nickname'sㄇ where you have theㄇopportunityㄇdreaming about Ďatingㄇaㄇmillionaireㄇ and make it true!
    I read these comments and there are so many haters out there. Not a single one of us, myself included would take less money for the betterment of our office, team, company. When you get a raise, no one ever asks what about Roger?, did he get a raise too! You take your raise, say thank you, and go back to work. Kudos to Peyton for doing what most would never do. And yes he makes a ton of money, is he worth it.... yes. Why? Because someone, in this case the Colts, are willing to pay him. So all you haters out there, look yourselves in the mirror because not a single one of you, myself included, would ever turndown this much money and give it to someone else. And if you are saying you would, you are lying and are full of Sh%&!59782042239
    • Jonas 3 months ago
      Are you off yer bleedin' trolley?

About Cow Corner

Cow Corner had a sheltered upbringing - it was educated from home and forfeited text books for hardback copies of Wisden Almanack with the only visual stimulation being the John Player League. "Cowers" is the illegitimate sibling of Early Doors and can often be seen on park benches around St John"s Wood trying to sell signed copies of Colin Dredge’s autobiography. Cow has been known to bowl some military medium whilst wielding the long handle at the bottom of the order and answers to one God and one God only, that known as Benaud.