Patrick Mouratoglou

What we learnt from final

Djokovic celebrates while Nadal packs up

The Australian Open final was an incredible match - and here's why.

A match for history
Five hours, 53 minutes for one match: the longest in a Grand Slam final and a fight between two of the toughest minds in the tennis history, men who went beyond their limits before Novak Djokovic eventually prevailed in this thriller.

Average level of play
The match was so enthralling because of the scenario, the drama and commitment of both players - not for the level of tennis they reached. They were better in the last US Open final: Spaniard Nadal played very short all match, and his Serbian opponent was not able to take advantage of this enough. Rafa was far below the level he reached during the matches against Tomas Berdych and Roger Federer - he realised how important this match was for his season and career. He was not able to start it with a good balance between aggression and stress, and as a consequence he was defensive right from the start and played far from his baseline. After three sets, he was spending four per cent of his time inside the court, whereas the figure was 34 per cent for the Serbian. He played short, down the middle too often, and tried to protect himself more than hurt his opponent. During the first three sets he wasn't moving well, as if he was overcome by the pressure of the event. This predictability helped Djokovic to be one shot ahead all the time.

Obvious weaknesses
Under stress, weaknesses are more obvious: his depth of shots was very worrying during this match with so many balls landing in the serving squares. His backhand was limited once again and he kept trying to change the diagonal in order to avoid being attacked on his weaker side - but his lack of deep shots saw him crushed by the Djokovic backhand. He was always defending because his opponent often used this chance to turn around his backhand. Also, his second serve was a gift for Novak, who is very efficient in this situation. His position, too far from the baseline, saw him become a victim of the cross-court shots and drop shots sent by Djokovic.

Admiring the bravery
His first serve saved him during this final - and he ended with a 67 per cent proportion of first serves in, with 66 per cent of points won behind this serve. With this exception, the Mallorcan suffered greatly and, without his amazing courage and will, the final would have been over in four sets for Djokovic. Once more, Rafa showed amazing fighting abilities and great heart - more than any other player I have seen.

What we learnt
Although the match wasn't 100 per cent satisfying regarding the level of play, we did learn a lot from it. During the semi-final against Andy Murray, Djokovic was dominated for long periods; in the final, he committed a lot of unforced errors and didn't play his best tennis. So Novak showed he was able to win under any circumstances, and even against the top players. The Serbian is continuing in his invincible mode, because he has now won four out of the last five Grand Slams. He is putting his mark on 2012 just as he did early in 2011. It's tough for Nadal, because it is now seven losses in a row against Djokovic in finals. He seemed to be getting closer to the Serbian - but if we consider that Nole wasn't at his best during this match, that now changes. Novak has sent a clear message to all the players: he's still the boss. The level of fitness he displays, his mental strength and determination to win should give his rivals something to think about. This match is proof that someone can win a Grand Slam final without playing amazing tennis - but through sheer effort. All players, and especially the French ones, should ask themselves if they have this kind of fight inside them - and then start to work towards it.

The next battle
Rafa and Nole will face each other again this season - perhaps several times. What should Rafa remember from this encounter? That it was won by the more aggressive, creative and dictating player. He must also add greater variety to his game: he always plays in the same areas on the return, his backhand nearly always down the line to change the diagonal, his forehand too often crossed and his slice on serve too often to Novak's backhand. He will also have to improve his second serve. But we should praise Novak Djokovic who, while playing in the same period as two of the greatest champions of all time — Rafa and Roger — has come to dominate the Tour. He now has five Grand Slam titles, and will certainly not stop there.

 

57 comments

  • Laura Olotu  •  2 months ago
    dat woz a tough match .i was supportin my man nd he won
    but gud job 2 d 2 players
    it wos difficult.
  • ralph  •  Vienna, Austria  •  3 months ago
    well i dont see it like patrick,nadal was much more aggressive than 2011 and seriously closed the gap,yes nole has the edge but to say he didnt play well is rubbish, the french will show us the true nature of the beast. in fact i expect nole to lose at least one of the clay court masters this year prior the french and then patrick can go back to his drawing board,if i am wrong and nole wins it all again like last season then yes even i will think that nadal is down and out but until the end of the clay season i think the jury is still out. great season ahead but dont be fooled rafa smelled noles blood in the ausie open final. to be continued
  • common sense so uncommon  •  3 months ago
    Rafael Nadal has surely been at work to adapt to­ Novak's game and executed it too for a couple of­ sets in the AO final; in the coming months he ought be­ able to become more consistent in dealing with the­ challenge that Novak's game poses to him just as he­ adapted to Roger's game. Of course, it also shall­ depend on whether Novak allows him the latitude to do­ so !

    In 2011, I felt that Rafa had lost that spark,­ that zing, that zeitgeist of his and seemed somehow to­ be just going through the motions and too strenuously­ at that, without that ebullient boyish charm and energy­ that marked his play of earlier years ! That running­ across from the other end of the court, making an­ incredible pass on the run and then pumping his arms to­ make himself go more "vamos" ! :-)

    In­ the semi-final against Roger, that energy seemed to be­ back though it was almost gone in the final, again ! I­ look forward to his playing with verve and enthusiasm again as he­ will enjoy playing and the results shall definitely­ reflect that energy.

    As he himself said in the­ post-match press conference, this last match-up­ banished all mental demons of his ! As it is, I never­ did feel that he was losing in 2011 while playing at­ his best; his pace was surely a notch or more less than­ his best. On the evidence of recent years he seems to­ have an excellent year and then an abysmal one (by his­ standards, of course) - thus, a high 2008 is followed­ by an injury-plagued 2009 with a terrific comeback in­ 2010 followed by the self-doubt of 2011. If he runs­ true to form, 2012 ought to turn out rather well for­ him !!!!!!!

    :-)
  • Dragana  •  Belgrade, Serbia  •  3 months ago
    Yes he is the boss, of course!
  • devic007  •  3 months ago
    Eurosport!! How about you link a right article to the right headline?????
  • Master  •  Gevgelija, Macedonia  •  3 months ago
    Very good comment; Nole can make 4 slams; French open 2011 was organizable mistake, sadly;
  • SAYASANE  •  Vientiane, Laos  •  3 months ago
    Novak a great player now
  • Francisco Gere  •  Budaörs, Hungary  •  3 months ago
    Well done Parick!
  • HsSimon  •  Oslo, Norway  •  3 months ago
    Very detailed and well researched article, though I doubt the value of these and other points to the players involved. Slight changes can and should be made when smt isn't working properly, and tactics should be discussed and tailor-made against any opponent, but apart from that, players need to train and prepare as they have been doing - when they've had some success, that is - and trust in their ability to rise to the occasion and even discover hidden possibilites and resources. This Djokovic has been able to, with great success, and I admire him for that. Now his adversaries need to work out ways to outsmart him, also in the majors. It's exciting times, indeed!
    • Tomic 3 months ago
      Well said!
    • HsSimon 3 months ago
      Thank you! Good to get some feedback other than thumbs up - or down.
    • Francisco Gere 3 months ago
      Simon, you said it very well!
  • Tomic  •  Amersfoort, The Netherlands  •  3 months ago
    It is very easy to say they should do this or that.. but you know what most important in a game is, that your oponent plays the way you let him to play.. nothing less and nothing more. Honestly i don't see noone in near future to take over from Novak, because he is most talented en most smart guy on the tour. Only Novak can destroy himself but he know better, is with both feet on the ground and will stay that way for long time!!
    • Francisco Gere 3 months ago
      You are 100% right! Novak is even moraly above them.
    • Tomic 3 months ago
      Thanks, only blind people can't see how great is he!
    • oh oh 3 months ago
      wow, you must be sooo wise with your eyes wide open !!!!!!!!!!! :-)
  • K T Low  •  Singapore, Singapore  •  3 months ago
    Great analysis. Pre-match analysis speculated that Rafa was planning to play much closer to the basline, but apparently did not in the match, or was unable to. He did do a good first serve.
  • Caroline  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
    Good detailed article. If only someone could convince Nadal that he'll never beat Djokovic from a couple of meters behind the baseline! Seems obvoius but Nadal is still playing way too far back. If he stepped up closer to the baseline he could still play his game - his net clearance would still be high but his top-spin shots would land deeper!!
    • Francisco Gere 3 months ago
      After so long time to change his game is the hardest thing to do...Till it was working, Nadal was superior, but Nole made a great tactic against that kind of play, and now Nadal is in trouble for the rest of his carrier. This match he should win in four sets...the rest was a gift for Rafa.
    • Tony 3 months ago
      I agree, but it is not easy task to get on baseline or even to get inside the court against Joker. His return is Rafa s problem, cause that is the shot that push Rafa behind. He managed to aproach baseline in semis against Fed, and failed to do that against Joker. Rafa told that himself, and we should believe him cause he is the one that suffers Jokers amasing and deadly return shots. Joker and Rafa are equal in any other aspect of game - they are great - , but this one - return - makes all difference.That one is not just great, it is masterpiece!
      BTW very stupid of Roger to underastimate Joker return as LUCKY shot (as hi did after USO semis). You have to apreciate your rival if you want to beat him. That is exactly what Joker been doing. He has been studying Fed and Rafa, and he deserves all the glory.
  • Stephen  •  3 months ago
    Good article here Patrick. I agree that Djokovic has sent a very clear message to the rest of the field: I am the best. He did win that match mainly because of sheer grit determination and belief. The tennis was awesome and breathtaking at times but dipped to an array of unforced errors and silly mistakes at others. I would certainly rank the match as one of the top 5 matches I have seen in a Grand Slam; for me the Wimbledon 2009 final remains the best match I have ever seen; the sustained high quality, intensity and shot-making ability was just off the scale. That does not detract from the incredible ability of these two players, particularly Djokovic who I would say played the match of his life to win. It's teetering on being mind-boggling to think that he had, less than 48 hours prior, just played an epic 5-setter against Murray and came through. It's mental toughness at its very best and I hope that this incredible rivalry will continue for many more years to come.
  • max  •  Maribor, Slovenia  •  3 months ago
    I actually thought Nadal played better then in most of last year meetings against Djokovic. He served much better, using body and wide serves very efficiently. Although still lacks 5-10 kph that he found in 2010. His forehand was more effective then it has been for a long time. The problem for Nadal is that he has to play at 100 % all the time against Novak just to keep up, where the Serb can go off the boil and still be on level terms with Rafa. And inevitable there're going to be drops in the level during the 5-setter.
  • king  •  Bratislava, Slovakia  •  3 months ago
    nole had 3 slams last year this year i hope he can make 4,,, wish him the best of luck ,,, that final was amazing like nole said at the end of the day one has to lose so it was nadal who lost that match but both of them played very well,,,, i am looking forward nadal nole french open final,,, it will be interesting ,,
    • Runner 3 months ago
      Agreed. You also have to take into account the Olympics going on during the summer and it really makes this summer interesting.
  • Anindita  •  Lawrence, United States  •  3 months ago
    Really Patrick, do you honestly mean to say that Rafa was NOT more aggressive than 2011?
    Did you see the speed on some of his shots (101 mph on and off forehand falling backwards) Except Set 3 where he played abysmally, he tried his best in Sets 1, part of set 2, sets 4 and 5. You forget what he has said repeatedly before the open, that he has not had enough time to practice with the new racquet and that is why he had planned to take February off (also to recuperate his shoulder issues) and be ready in March for the rest of the season. Considering the fact that he almost defaulted Did you see his reactions after winning against Roger and the 4th set against Novak? It was beyond his expectations to have reached the Final and if anything his confidence has shot up simply because he came back from 3-4 love-40 down in the fourth set and was somehow able to take it to a fifth where he played quite well (you don't win a 31 stroke rally at 4 all in the fifth set by playing badly please...) You forget that he was quite aggressive in almost all his matches and there is no question he has seen the benefits especially when he was attacking. He won the vast majority of those points. As he said his mental demons have gone, and i think he was being sincere as he was calm and relaxed (outwardly anyway) and not breaking down in tears aka Mr Federer. I think his game will only go upwards from here, not down because he fought unlike 2011. But we have to thank Novak for pushing Rafa to improve which he has managed on many occasions in the past (135 mph serves at the US Open, winning Wimbledon twice by stepping in and taking returns early). Let us see what the future holds. Time will tell as always.
  • devic007  •  3 months ago
    I only hope that all top four will stay out of injuries.
    If so, we may witness one of the very best years of tennis ever.

    While the last year was the best one in Novak's career, I would acknowledge that he also profited on a "surprise" factor. Not that he did not deserve such a run, but the surprise for the big duo (Rafa/Roger) was the level of rise of Nole's game they could not have even imagined, and hence they did not have a clear answer to the "new kid on the block."
    This year, it will be different. Big duo, but Murray too, they know who do they have to put up with. So, they will know that they have to think twice before getting out against Nole.
    On the other hand, Nole knows that as well.

    Roger will still capitalize on his experience, Rafa will benefit from its physical condition, Nole will benefit from his brain and mental advantage, and Murray has Lendl on board.
    Very nice plot. Sit, and enjoy!!!!!
  • Amanda  •  Madrid, Spain  •  3 months ago
    Yeah, I just remembered Mats during the match saying how the finals of grand slams are not exciting anymore because these two meet too often… Well, if this was not exciting, then what is?
  • Runner  •  3 months ago
    I think the good news for Novak is that he has room for improvement as he comes back from his injury at the end of last year while Nadal and Murray have been given hope and will probably be trying harder, so it makes the summer an interesting one.
  • bobo  •  Belgrade, Serbia  •  3 months ago
    Very good analysis,I'd say.But I think Novak's approach to the game is different than Rafa's, Rodger...and so on.He didn't come to AO to deffend something but to win.And something else, remember Rodger's tears (couple years ago), and opposite of that Novak's primal scream , shirt rippin' and pummping muscles like UFC fighter after a big stress.Different approach , I mean this is men's tennis ..

About Patrick Mouratoglou

For 15 years Patrick Mouratoglou has headed the Mouratoglou Tennis Academy, renowned as one of the most successful in producing future champions. The Academy has an impressive honour list with several junior world champions and players who have reached the world"s top 10. He has coached Marcos Baghdatis, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Jérémy Chardy and wrote the book "Educate to Win". He currently coaches the Bulgarian Grigor Dimitrov.

Latest tennis blog post

  • French Open preview: Clay not for D …

    With the French Open starting this weekend, Eurosport analyst Mats Wilander looks ahead to the action. The seven-times Grand Slam winner considers how clay is the least … More »

    Mats Wilander
  • It’s inconceivable that Nadal won’t …

    It’s inconceivable that Nadal won’t …

    Rafael Nadal's form during this clay-court season has been absolutely frightening, and I cannot see anyone beating him at Roland Garros. The world number two overcame … More »

    Simon Reed
  • Smart money on Serena for Roland Ga …

    Smart money on Serena for Roland Ga …

    There are numerous candidates for the French Open on the women's side, but one stand-out performer who will surely prevail: Serena Williams. The American has only won … More »

    Simon Reed
  • Serena is back – and she deserves i …

    Serena is back – and she deserves i …

    Having swept to victory in Charleston, Serena Williams won in Madrid after battering world No.1 Victoria Azarenka in the final - signalling the return of the century's … More »

    Patrick Mouratoglou
  • Blue clay cannot return

    Blue clay cannot return

    There's no doubt that the blue clay at the Madrid Masters was a mistake. Watching the Rome Masters today, you can see the difference clearly — the ball is more difficult … More »

    Simon Reed
POLL

Is Rafael Nadal set to challenge for the No.1 ranking again?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options