Paul Parker

Pep or Jose for England? Don’t make me laugh

I was bemused to read in some newspapers on Friday morning that the Football Association has widened its search for a new manager to include Real Madrid's Jose Mourinho and Barcelona's Pep Guardiola.

There is absolutely no way either of those two are going to manage England. It's a poisoned chalice, and with the reputations they have, why would either want to come and work for the FA and manage this underachieving and underwhelming group of players?

You could bring back Sir Alf Ramsey, or any of the coaches who have won the World Cup throughout history, and they are not going to win anything with this England team. That would be like getting an expert builder to try and construct a house without using cement. The FA might well be setting their sights high and looking at La Liga's two leading coaches, but as for suggestions they might be tempted, it's absolute garbage.

Employing someone like Mourinho will not address the underlying problems in the English game, and in any case he is not an international manager. Is he really going to want to work for only 10 games a year? Of course not, he loves the day in, day work involvement of a club coach. And as for Guardiola, is he really going to swap working with Lionel Messi for Stewart Downing? It is absolutely ridiculous to suggest that this is a possibility.

At the moment we have to build for the future. Instead of trying to buy in one of the world's best managers, we should invest money in coaxing the best foreign coaches to come and work with our young players from Under-16 level and improve technique from an early age. That is where we need to be making investment.

The Dutch pay thousands to their ex-players to work with their elite youngsters. As a child, having the opportunity to be coached by someone like Marco van Basten, Ruud Gullit or Frank Rijkaard must be fantastic, and it shows in the final product.

To be honest, talk of Mourinho and Guardiola could be a smokescreen from the FA, because at present their negotiating position with Tottenham is disastrous, especially when dealing with someone like Daniel Levy who relishes driving a hard bargain.

Everyone knows it is going to be Harry Redknapp. Spurs know Harry is worth a fortune because of what he has achieved, and the press and public have made him into the people's champion. Tottenham will make the FA pay through the nose as a result.

Harry might get parachuted in in time for the Euros but does he know enough about international football? Will he be able to settle in straight away and be the leader England need at a major tournament? I still think there are question marks about Harry and we are putting all our eggs in one basket.

As for whether the FA is acting swiftly enough, I think we have to wait and see. The next couple of weeks will be crucial and what happens at Tottenham will have a big bearing.

If things drag on much longer then the likelihood that Stuart Pearce will be in charge for the Euros will increase. Stuart has said he doesn't want the job full-time but that he is prepared to lead England at the finals if necessary. He has to say that really as he is an ambitious person and he is honest. If the FA can't get someone in before the tournament then he will take on the responsibility.

I thought he did fine at Wembley on Wednesday against Netherlands. It was good to see that we changed to a 4-3-3, and it was good to see we were trying younger players, even if that process could still be accelerated.

To be frank, we shouldn't be talking about winning the Euros. We should be talking about building a team for the future and Ithink a new start is desirable. By naming a young squad, Stuart has started something that hopefully will be continued by the new man.

We should be asking what value players like John Terry and Steven Gerrard bring to the team and demonstrate that we are ready to put the past behind us. If Gerrard isn't going to be captain then why have him in the team? There is a player like Jack Rodwell who can perform that role and is young and fresh. I don't even want to hear Terry's name any more. He can have a European holiday if he wants, but he shouldn't be going to the Euros.

I think if the public see there is a vision for the future, and that Pearce's work is being continued by the new man, they will get behind the national side. If we go back to how things have been over the past few competitions then I don't think there is any way forward for us.

 

82 comments

  • kenny f  •  Leicester, England  •  2 months ago
    you cant make a silk purse out of a sows ear,and both of those managers have the intelligence to realise that is what they would be expected to achieve.
  • freelance  •  Reading, England  •  2 months ago
    Parker,so now you are saying England are not worth lookin at as the likes of Rooney,Jones,Smalling,Ferdinand,Young and the rest of the Utd players wont win anything on the International level,everyone wants Harry,but personally i'd go with Mourinho as to me he still watches prem games so will know which players can do a job,mind you,who would you choose as Redknapp would prob pick some of his squad who aint International level,so on that Mr Parker tune in and listen to the cheers when England come home early again due to ex England flops criticising those whom a nation depends on
  • David  •  Buckie, Scotland  •  2 months ago
    I'm old enough to remember 1966 and looking back the thing that strikes you about that English team is the absence of star players. The only player of star repute in the English side was Bobby Charlton. The rest were picked to play the system that Alf Ramsey wanted played. The problem that England keep having is that the players think they know better than the manager. Until you get a manager who has the moral authority to decide on a playing style and pick a team accordingly that team will fail. To pick a team then try to find a style to suit them puts the cart before the horse.

    The big problem for whoever is picked as manager will have is the press core- that group of self appointed experts (many of whom last kicked a ball as a child if at all)- who will all rubbish the managers efforts in different ways. Perhaps the FA should offer the manager's job to these 'experts' and let us see what a dogs breakfast they make it. After all they think they know much more about the sport than all the professional managers put together.
    • Ian 2 months ago
      Roger Hunt,Geoff Hurst,Alan Ball,Gordon Banks,Bobby Moore, Jimmy Armfield, Martin Peters...............They were all SUPERstars at their respective clubs The difference being that Alf Ramsey didnt have to battle with massive super over inflated egos - he just had to manage the players - they were all stars in their own right but they had dignity& respect..........Thats how we won it.
    • john sloop b 2 months ago
      yep, I agree ,England had a great team away back then, household names every one. I also remember the Scottish team who played the world cup winning team a few months later and played them of the park at wembley . household names every one .who could forget Jim Baxter playing 'keepie uppie ' as England tried to get the ball off him. and bremner bossing the middle of the field, and the great dennis Law running riot. ah the memories .
  • duncan  •  Tunis, Tunisia  •  2 months ago
    Paul much as I would love to have 'arry at the helm I think yesterdays game showed what we can expect if he goes to the Euro games..despite Manu writing nonsense over his tactics he still pressed on..for me thats not tactical at..all also am not sure how players like Alan Johnson, Micah Richards who look so good at City can play away from the likes of City and its great players...we need a yound energetic coach advertise for the post and get qualtiy cvs...
  • Bill  •  Reading, England  •  2 months ago
    PAUL THE PARKER AS I CALL YOU - FOR ONCE YOU ARE SPOT ON AGREE WITH YOU ALL THE WAY WHETHER PEOPLE RESPECT YOU OR NOT YOU ARE SPOT ON HERE EXCEPT TO THOSE THAT ARE BLINDED TO THE REAL TRUTH
    • Ian 2 months ago
      lower case moron
  • Ed  •  Basingstoke, England  •  2 months ago
    Then who do you want Parker?! Redknapp is not going to be the England manager before the end of the season, end of. Guardiola may fancy it and everyone knows he doesn't want to be at Barca forever. Finally, if 'Arry's going to have any impact it'll be straight away...that's what he does...remember Spurs being at the foot of the table? He come's in and we draw 4-4 at the Emirates.
    • Ian 2 months ago
      you cant count - it was 5-2 to arsenal - you gave i away! Rednapp has done nothing! - nothing! Wheres the silver ware? Results = trophys Flash in the pan
  • elson l  •  Mt Hamilton, United States  •  2 months ago
    With (big) clubs, a manager can pick players from all over the world. With countries, he's limited to 1 singular country. That's a big limitation.
  • AkA  •  London, England  •  2 months ago
    This is true, English football makes so many excuses (nationality of the manager, player egos, foreign players in the league) but the cause is more fundamental than most people realise. Spanish, Dutch, Brazillian, Argentinian and even Italian football focus more on flair, passing and vision of their attacking players at the youth stage, allowing players to dribble and take on defenders. England coaches flair out of players and focuses on its attack being stronger and more physical, with one bigger striker to hold up the ball and the other to be more of a poacher or outpace defenders on through balls. That's great for defensive players but the game has changed.

    You only have to look at the German game to see what I'm talking about. For years their forward game also focused on the physical side of things, players like Bierhoff, Klinsmann etc. That worked for a time, but the game is on a higher level now and they haven't won anything since Euro '96, where there were only really two or three teams in it anyway. They've adapted and began to allow more freedom and individual skill, forward players roaming in and out of position. These days, they were the most exciting team in the World Cup and should feel disappointed if they don't make the Euro 2012 final

    We always had only one or two players with actual skill in each team. It's not enough. These days there's a clear difference in the quality between the English national team and the other big footballing nations. The signs for the future are looking good though, our England U21 team is full of players with great skill, passing ability and variety. That's because of the foreign influx into the league, mixing it up and cutting out this "long ball to the big guy" mentality. I'm not an Arsenal supporter but we do have primarily Arsene Wenger to thank for that.

    Our only problem will be that the younger players of other countries have a bit more of a head start on us...
  • Richard  •  Northampton, England  •  2 months ago
    ibenwa you are an illiterate sod..learn some english if you,re going to make comments...anyway what do americans know about football or soccer as you comically call it.
  • Richard  •  Northampton, England  •  2 months ago
    prefer an english manager if possible as i don't believe a foreign one can have the same desire to see england win especially if we come up against his own country in a crucial match.
  • Paul  •  Rochdale, England  •  2 months ago
    Make Terry the manager
  • Gavin  •  2 months ago
    The omens say it all, it gonna be another duck egg for England at the Euros....too much negativity in the dressing room and outside...
    • Ed 2 months ago
      To be fair...it's the opposite of usual...there's normally a mountain of false hope to clamber over, maybe this time they'll surprise us because we're not expecting much.
  • Ibenwa  •  Seattle, United States  •  2 months ago
    pls tell dat to terry, lampard, cole. As long as dis set of people are been surported by england as a whole...then all dis advice u are given wil not make any meaning...england dont no what they want.
  • Daniel  •  Maidenhead, England  •  2 months ago
    rubish writing!!! If the FA wants to performe well and maybe win the euro then the only people that can do it is Mourinho, Sir Alex or God. Otherwise they got to wait for 2014 world cup. but again is harder to win that then the Euro , you have brazil , argentina and many more...English manager yes but theres none to win it or do well cos they will have no time to prepare. Only the special one or a very experience Sir Alex can take England to the final
    • kevin 2 months ago
      If the players aren't good enough we're not going to win, it doesn't matter who's managing the team.
  • Felice Tedechi  •  Hounslow, England  •  2 months ago
    If the FA are not going to give the job to 'The Illiterate One' or Psycho who is the only English candidate who really deserves it the job should go to Hervé Renard who knows a thing or two about training lads picked from limited talent pools and turning them into teams that can turnover Premiership Allstars and winning major international trophies, which is what England needs far more than some smug dog in Monaco counting millions.

    Chipolopolo 4 ever !
  • Avi  •  Port Louis, Mauritius  •  2 months ago
    The writer jst describe how GOOD ( xD ) steward downing is ( a liverpool player... :p :p ) by compraing him to messy...
  • john sloop b  •  Troon, Scotland  •  2 months ago
    The real problem is that England thinks it is a world power in football, I mean how many more years can they keep showing that old B/white movie of 1966 on the BBC, or the one thats been coloured in to make the fans think it was in more recent times hoho. never was a truer word spoken during this old old movie , 'its all over now' . it was down hill all the way after that final . now even the Scots look forward to any competition that England qualifies for, it always turns out to be the best entertainment on the box. they good bit is usually the penalty shoot outs , but the last effort went down in history, wow! 5million Scots pishing themselves laughing, and the never ending drama that goes on to this day. Why do the English take this so seriously , it wont matter who is the manager, you just have to accept its the foreigners who have the skill in the premiership , but I admit , your are well worth a world cup for entertainment alone , just like the 'oscars' , 'and the winner is (for repeated disasters)...England ! huge applause heard coming from Scotland .
  • lakkerz  •  Bracknell, England  •  2 months ago
    Best article i have re4ad from Parker in recent times....I think theres a problem with the youth development system.Over the years i have observed and realized that England F.A dont take youth competitions seriously.world under 17,under 20,under 23 and some of the under age competitions around the world...But if you take a look at some of the present world dominating football nations,you will realized that bulk of their players are developed through this competitions and gradually intergrated into the senior teams.Likes of Messi,Aguero,Iniesta,Fabregas,Xavi,Kroos,and some of the exiciting young talents you can find around the world today have one time or the other played in all these youth competitions which helped to expose them and help to develop their games.Some of these countries makes it mandatory to qualify for these competitions every year even though they may sometimes not win it.And if they failed to qualified they see it as a disaster.But the English solely believe that EPL is enough for them to expose and develop their young players,yes theres no doubt about it EPL is the most glamorous league in the world and its every players dream to play in EPL but despite that theres a decline in young English talents,despite all the measures put in place by the FA to cut the number of foreign players a club can field at a time,these are done to help develop the English players but none of these have produce a desireable results.In my humble opinion i think its high time they made qualifying for under age competitions a priority and not only that but also make sure all young players playing for the Big clubs that falls within the Age bracket are released for the competitions
  • Ron  •  St Albans, England  •  2 months ago
    Great article Parker you speak a lot of truth, but unfortunately some people cannot handle the truth
  • KEVIN  •  London, England  •  2 months ago
    martin oneal is the man, this is about motivation

About Paul Parker

Paul Parker enjoyed a distinguished career for club and country. The versatile defender won 19 England caps and played the 1990 World Cup semi-final against West Germany. After spells at Fulham and QPR, Paul joined Manchester United in 1991, where he helped the club claim their first league title for 26 years, and won the Double twice. During six seasons at Old Trafford, he played with legends such as Eric Cantona, Roy Keane and David Beckham.

POLL

Should Roberto Di Matteo be given the Chelsea job full-time?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options