Wed May 06 08:54AM
If Bob Dylan only ever writes one song about a Scottish utility player, it will surely centre on the unjust red card that rules Darren Fletcher out of the Champions League final.
Fletcher is the victim of a miscarriage of justice that ranks him alongside Ruben 'Hurricane' Carter, the A-Team and Matthew Rose off EastEnders.
The most one-sided semi-final for years was ambling to its conclusion when Cesc Fabregas ran through on goal.
Given the state of the tie, Fletcher might have been better off just letting the Arsenal skipper score, but instead he hooked his right foot around Fabregas's body to make a brilliant goal-saving tackle.
Rosetti, who was following the play, could not have seen the tackle but ruled that Fletcher had fouled Fabregas. Following the letter of the law, he had no choice but to send the United man off, because any foul would obviously have denied a clear goalscoring opportunity.
Nobody is expected to feel sorry for United, least of all Spurs fans whose Schadenfreude can be easily explained with the words Howard and Webb.
But the point is that, as Fletcher's red card did not affect the result (imagine if it had...) and the situation can easily be rectified. And yet it seems it won't be.
Even Alex Ferguson seemed more dumbfounded than angry. His mood may have been mellowed by humbling his nemesis Arsene Wenger, or perhaps he was just thinking 'thank God it wasn't Rooney'.
It is often said that the powers-that-be risk undermining referees' authority if they keep reversing their decisions retrospectively. Well, nothing undermines Rosetti like the possibility that his blatant error might be compounded by UEFA upholding Fletcher's suspension.
In any case, it once again demonstrates the need for video technology such as that used in... oh, every other major sport. If it's good enough for cricket, rugby, tennis and every US sport, it is surely good enough for football.
Now, there is always a chance that UEFA might change the ruling anyway. After all, they caved in to an epic level of Liverpudlian whingeing in 2005 and allowed Rafa Benitez's side in to defend their title.
But you can't help feeling the whole farrago could have been avoided if UEFA employed one bloke whose only job was to say: "That was a rubbish decision, change it."- - -
Joey Barton has no apparent redeeming features, but perhaps the worst aspect of his latest indiscretion is the sheer vitriol he stirs up in Joe Public.
Early Doors trawled through the user comments on yesterday's story announcing his suspension by Newcastle and waded straight into what a tabloid newspaper would no doubt call an 'orgy of hate'.
Barely a single contributor managed to have their say without blurting out the words 'thug', 'scum' or 'aminal'.
The standard suggestion was a life ban from football, while others proposed that he be bussed straight back to Strangeways or inserted directly into a filthy gutter.
Any comments attempting to stick up for Barton - or even mitigate the criticism - quickly accumulated so many thumbs down they disappeared from view.
Later on Tuesday afternoon, Danny Murphy gave his views in a column for this site entitled 'Don't crucify Barton' suggesting that, while he has brought this situation on himself and deserves the criticism levelled at him by Alan Shearer, he should have the chance to redeem himself.
Never has the claim that a man should not be nailed to a cross and left to die created such a ruckus. Not since biblical times, anyway.
Some chump called Ken A weighed in with a grammatically-priceless opening gambit, slamming Murphy for daring to show a bit of human compassion: "murphy your a idiot how many chances does he want please keep away from liverpool"
That pretty much set a tone of universal condemnation and much foaming at the mouth.
One thing that nobody could explain was why they were so angry.
Was it for the tackle which, while rash, was no worse than dozens of challenges seen every season?
Was it for the bust-up with Shearer, about which we know only what we were told on the back pages of Tuesday's Sun?
Was it for his previous misdemeanours, for which we have all had plenty of opportunity to vent our spleen?
Why would Barton provoke a reaction every bit as violent, malicious and spiteful as anything he has ever done?
ED suspects envy that a young and largely horrible man has made millions from playing football and still can't control his violent, antagonistic tendencies.
And maybe there were a few self-esteem issues at work - people desperate to denigrate somebody who they could easily identify as being worse than them.
Whatever, it was a horribly undignified spectacle, with many people exhibiting precisely the same wild-eyed bloodlust that caused Barton to beat up an innocent teenager in the street or attack a team-mate in training.
In the infamous BrassEye special of 2001, a spoof news programme throws a paedophile to a baying mob, who promptly rip him limb from limb. ED fears Barton would suffer the same fate.
Joey Barton gallery of hate (unedited version)
fred.bell: Like most views on this story I can only agree that this guy is beyond help. He should be declared unemployable. And then watch him descend into the gutter from whence he came.
trentbridge47: don't think there is enough therapy in the world for
this guy
hope newcastle
take the loss and nobody with a bit of common sense buys him. but i guarantee
one of the promoted teams does probally birmingham
that would be a great midfield with bowyer just needs fred west and peter
sutcliffe and Fritzell from Austria
carl.john64: if a dog had behaved the way barton has recently it would be put down as a danger,it is a pitty we can not do that. with his violent nature on and of the playing field the @#$% should be sacked and banned from football for life
smurf86: Joey Barton is a disgusting horrible piece of work. This suspension is long overdue. The guy should be kicked out never to return. Earning the sort of money a footballer earns should be a privilege and this guy is sub-human and certainly doesn't deserve it. He is bad through and through. Goodbye and good riddance I say.
abbot59: Sack him, then no other club should touch him. Let the scumbag disappear into oblivion. The @#$% is evil, its in his blood.
Dannystewart84: I hope Joey Barton gets lynched- absolute scum! I would punch him in the face if I ever saw him in the street.
Bryanrichardson: I GOT A PHOTOGRAPH OF HIM CUTTING GRASS DURING HIS COMMUNITY SERVICE I THEN SNAPPED HIM BEING DROPPED OFF AT A BETTING SHOP WHILE THE REST OF HIS FELLOW CRIMINALS WAITED IN THIER PUNISHMENT VAN , SICKENING
Seanjnr: He should not be left near anybody .... "SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR LIFE" ... full stop !
- - -
HEADLINES OF THE DAY. NOT
The Sun: Ro-Man Emperor
Daily Mirror: Show me the way to go Rome!
Daily Express: Cristiano Rome-aldo
Daily Mail: Rome-aldo
Star: Ron's Rome 'n
dry
Where's the final again?
FOREIGN VIEW: 'Yes, Barca!' That is the best headline El Mundo Deportivo can come up with ahead of Barcelona's trip to Stamford Bridge. They're playing an English team, see?
COMING UP: Chelsea v Barcelona kicks off at 19:45 UK time and we're doing the full works once again. ED suspects it will be a good one.
Good job, United!
Chelsea - United again, yawn already!
2nd
UEFA should have saved arsenal the humiliation and taken Manchester straight to the finals
Book me a flight to ROME for the end of May - Sean United Fan from MANCHESTER........................................
.........
It was a night for Arsenal to turn from Boyz II Men but they were made to look like Garbage.
What a Game!!!!!!
All the plaudits for Ronaldo, yet on 3 blatant occasions he dove for free kicks and eigned injury, maybe it'd be better if UEFA used technology to clamp down on players cheating rather than officials mistakes, after all, a referee doesn't KNOWINGLY cheat!
all i understand from this :
e.d. is ga/y for barton :O.... and fletcher
first? come on chelsea!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Have faith in Barca !
They'll beat the scum (errr same as I said about the Gooners tho)
Joey Barton = scum + thug + animal
Liverpudlian whingeing in 2005
Hi Guys
Ok Jude? Still celebrating with your Spurs - loving friend?
I find it strange that if a referee were to make a decision that was plainly wrong that there is no appeals process. Heck he is human and cant be right ALL the time?!
Even cricket uses technology to help to get better decisions.
Time for football to grow up and embrace technology - get into the 21st Century!!!
flecther deserved to be sent off and for ronaldo as bad as drogba diving cheating c';t
God trentbridge47 is so stupid his evil dream team needs platers like Stalin at right-back Maximilien Robespierre at left-back. Hitler as the goalkeeper, they have to be crazy don't they. Idi Amin Dada and Ivan the terrible as a centre back. Pol Pot and Reverend Jim Jones as a winger. Vlad III of Romania and Josef Mengele in central midfield. The two forwards are Ruhollah Khomeini and Emperor Hirohito of Japan.
Oh Jay, Oh Jay, O j, Oj - i'm thirsty now...i don't know what was the biggest talking point of last night...the sending off or the Arsenal
supporters caught on TV starting to leave on the 61 minute mark!
the gunners looked like a bunch of amateurs
no way they would win it
wondering what gibbs is doing right now
just wish he could sleep last night
y dont all shut up every team have a bad run yer ok man u were the better team look when man u were loseing aswell we cant all win week in and week out arsenal are haveing a few problems and so wot u all quick 2 slag arsenal down i dont see u do it 2 liverpool or chelsea
15 Are you so anti- Man United that you cant see that the slow - mo technology shows Fletcher kicking the ball BEFORE the man?
In cricket you're not out LBW if the ball hits the bat BEFORE the pads.
Sounds like your bias is showing!
Fritsel would have to be reserve keeper. The ba***rd.
"In any case, it once again demonstrates the need for video technology such as that used in... oh, every other major sport. If it's good enough for cricket, rugby, tennis and every US sport, it is surely good enough for football. All it needs is one bloke to s"
Complete the sentence ED. Or did your wife sent you to work w/o breakfast and u decided to eat up a sentence instead.
From the ref's viewpoint he couldn't have seen Fletcher make contact with the ball, however, he could have clearly seen Fletcher's hand on Fabregas' left shoulder, pulling him back. I think that's the reason for the card.
Given the free kicks for Ronaldo's blatent diving, the worst of which was the one from which he scored I think that Man U have no justifyable complaint. Karma! It's just a shame for Fletcher that he's the one who's gonna miss the final.
Jay has gone off for a 48 hour drink to forget last night.
Any way since do you do Schardenfrau Mr Villa?
imagine if the ref got it right last night
yes Fletcher did get the ball but.....
the tackle was from behind, it was high, potentially dangerous (though probably without intent of being so) and he certainly got the man as well.
i think Fletcher should be commended for his enthusiasm, his effort and his strength. Also for his commitment to a team that was in control of the tie and his clear pride in not being beaten. He should also be commended for the sanguine way he left the field as should all the united players who did not attack the ref. So a lot of positive stuff there.
But.... the ref was right.
Great game, shows that United are currently up there with the best of them. As for Darren Fletcher, tough luck mate, you deserve your place in that final. If you were a Liverpool player no doubt Uefa would find a loop hole to allow you to play...
hiberno_knin... dry your eyes and get ready for the carling cup next year, you might actually win that, unless u get united in the semis that is
ED
Your article is ok but a little short on pezzaz!
There seems very little more one can say about the sending off.
how long does it take to get a decision in cricket? its not often spontaneous is it? Sometimes it can take many minutes because decisions whether good or bad can be marginal and stuff needs to be looked at from all angles. What impact would have have on football? Would there be a limit on the number of decisions a team can ask for an opinion on be it a foul, an offisde, the ball crossing the line? Cricket is stop start. Football ain't. All technology would do in football is make people wonder about another crooked official.
arsenal.!! oh dear..sit back and re-assess the damage caused by poor tactics , amateurs with good intentions..!! even portsmouth and spurs have been more succesful in the last 4 years...improve.???no.. that was them at their peak...letting the fans down..may it continue....give Tevez that contract.!!!
Please sign in to add your comments.