Roland Garros Message Board

ViewSummary |  Expanded
AsThreaded |  Message List
  • nadal-legend on clay?

    catalin by catalin . Jun 8, 2008 23:29 . Permalink

    its amaizing that nadal won a 4th consecutive french open and again beats federer in the final.but this time he was untoucheble...do we stand in front of the borne of a legend?

    • Re: nadal-legend on clay?

      football4life by football4life . Jun 26, 2008 01:05 . Permalink

      what a shame his power and speed for his size would have been perfect on grass. by the way...

      what a shame his power and speed for his size would have been perfect on grass. by the way clover i'm glad novak lost as it serves two purposes. First, it shuts up all the serbs who trash talk all day. Second, it clears the way for another federer nadal final so we can settle this debate

    • Re: nadal-legend on clay?

      Tim13 by Tim13 . Jun 23, 2008 00:25 . Permalink

      Clover; I respect your opinion too.I am just expressing my opinion about Nadal and Federer...

      Clover; I respect your opinion too.I am just expressing my opinion about Nadal and Federer and other players.Of course,we don't have to agree on everything but the reality is that Nadal is the best on clay and Federer is the best on grass.Let's not forget about Djokovic.He is capable of beating both Nadal and Federer.I think Wimbeldon's draw this year may favour Nadal.Both Federer and Djokovic are on the same bracket.So.Nadal could be waiting for the winner and that could be advantage:Nadal !!

    • Re: nadal-legend on clay?

      clover by clover . Jun 24, 2008 18:12 . Permalink

      he had a knee injury or something,he missed french open.i didn't see him on the table at w...

      he had a knee injury or something,he missed french open.i didn't see him on the table at wimbledon as well.i guess he hasn't fully recovered.

    • Re: nadal-legend on clay?

      Tim13 by Tim13 . Jun 20, 2008 04:05 . Permalink

      Do you actually read what other posters are saying? Let me summarize it for you.Just try t...

      Do you actually read what other posters are saying? Let me summarize it for you.Just try to read and understand what people are saying,then you can post !! Everybody agrees that Nadal is the best on clay BUT he has not won any other grand slam yet.So far he has won FOUR grand slams,all at the French Open.Ok.? Now,Federer is the best on all surfaces except clay.RG is the only GS that he has not won,yet.So far,he has won TWELVE grand slams.Are we clear on this? Federer has not yet won at RG.Nadal has not won in Wimbeldon,the US Open or the Australian Open.These are the facts !! Everything else is only an opinion.Everybody is entitled to their opinion.You don't have to agree with it but you have to respect it.That is if you trying to have an intelligent,open minded debate !!

    • Re: nadal-legend on clay?

      football4life by football4life . Jun 22, 2008 08:06 . Permalink

      Clover with all due respect i think you are wrong about nadal having all the time to win g...

      Clover with all due respect i think you are wrong about nadal having all the time to win grand slams other than RG. there is a guy named Novak Djokovic who is even younger than nadal waiting to take the crown after federer,

    • View More Messages