West Ham United Message Board
" it costs $500 from any one of a number of closed hacking sites I belong to, they trace your IP address from Yahoo, get the name of your ISP, then hack them for your name, address, and phone number"
LMFAO - I see "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" is at it again with 'it's' scaremongering.
The Outback Cowboy is full of shyte as per usual, in more ways than one, but that $500 tracing via a hacker is just LAUGHABLE!!!
You want other people to debate things to kickbit off, as you have not got the skills to do so yourself.
After the lies about Drummer, i am wondering if your disgusting emails are a fabrication also.
This is a good point soundly made by MCMXCIX. Only a fool would bet on arsenal right now because in all liklihood they wont have many chance to field a strong team, what with the injuries and burnout starting to mount up. Arsenal and man city are going out of the cl next round for sure, but this could play to their advantages in the league, especially city who are favourites. Then if anyone can beat barcelona, its probably an inform man city at home outscoring them. once we are out their will be no excuse for us getting top for status secured.
I don't know why some people are shocked.
They beat Newcastle 4-0, Utd, 4-1, Spurs 6-0
They have a massive and very expensive squad that had an extra day rest in between games.
We were always going to be the underdogs for this one.
Personally the score in my mind was wrong. We had offside goals called against us when they weren't offside and a penalty shout that was ignored. Milner's penalty was a joke.
Forget this game. Chelsea is the big test now. We NEED this to restore the points gap. Liverpool have got a Cardiff team on the slide this weekend, at home.
Your sarcasm and insecurities Sweet know no boundaries, clearly your time spent with Skippy both on and off the boards has left you half the woman you used to be. Your earlier comment I had crossed to the dark side is lamentable.When the vile Rik attacked EVERYONE on the crime board except you, you could not understand why I should show support for you, when you were siding with him. Bearing in mind that his most vile foul mouthed attacks were aimed at me. As far as I can see, you 3 have been "corresponding" on this board for months and months now. If I had been directed to this board, it would have happened a long time ago. You found this board, so go figure how I found it. I told you months ago I would not send you any more funnies, so why ask a question when the answer is obvious?
"We had offside goals called against us when they weren't offside"
No you didn't, Bendtner was clearly offside, and Giroud scored long after the whistle had blown, the keeper didn't even bother moving.
"you could not understand why I should show support for you,"
Apart from the fact that doesn't make sense .... Sweet didn't expect you to support her, she merely wondered why you didn't have the guts to say so then, and why you kept on insisting you hadn't seen Kipper/Lenny abuse her.
You're a toe-rag, bummer, and a coward, you didn't 'find' this place, because it's been unfindable for months, there are no longer any links to it .... so how did you suddenly find it?
You and kipper are two peas in a pod, neither of you are any good, and you wonder why I had so many goes at you on the crime board.
You and a couple of others thought you owned the place, you called me, and other, a newbie, and intimated that I had no right to be there, you and the other tools got a big shock when I started telling you how it was, and you never got over it.
Now you can go fluck yourself!
"You want other people to debate things"
She doesn't want "other people" to debate things, just you, with your alter-ego, Jack.
She finds it amusing how you, pretending not to be Kipper, refrained from attacking Mandela with your Eddy ID, but used 'Jack' to do it.
At the risk of repeating myself. Either you are a natural born liar, or Rikk is sending things to you to stir trouble.
End of now, I'm bored of your lies and prattling
Oh. And Rikk has admitted to being a member of hacking sites etc etc, so it does not take a leap of faith to see that he could do what you allege is happening. Plus and you won't believe me but he does have previous for the hacking AND virus part.
If you have an e-mail return address to work with then you should be able to sort it!
Cut the pathetic threats. You scare nobody you deranged witch!
Hi Michael & Jason
I think we need to use Gerrard wisely. For matches where we need lots of energy (against busy midfields that press - e.g. Southampton), we should start with the three yesterday. Stevie can come on when such teams are tiring or even start wide right of the three behind Suarez.
I'm not convinced of replacing Lucas with Gerrard. The position he plays is specialist and, above all, you need someone who really wants to play it. As an example, once on the weekend we got caught out forward and Sakho had to cover at left back. Lucas automatically dropped in to center-half. It seems obvious but that's instinct - I'm not sure Gerrard has that.
Lucas hasn't been as good since his injury but I think he's more effective than we give him credit for. I thought Lucas did well on the weekend without having to try and do some of Stevie's running.
You said it, coward!
When are you going to explain this ..... "he has threatened this before, even saying he has paid the money and his relatives are coming to do some damage on his behalf." .... Kipper?
"he does have previous for the hacking AND virus part."
How do you know? You posted here for the first time on November 28th .... COWARD!
And when are you going to explain this .... "he has threatened this before, even saying he has paid the money and his relatives are coming to do some damage on his behalf." ..... Kipper?
Bayern Munich defender Jerome Boateng admitted: "They're the toughest opponents we could have had. They'll be totally up for it after what happened last year. Both matches will be very intense."
Hey 'virus-mad Rikki, take note son!
I thought we'd have the debate here as many a thread seems to settle into this area at the moment.
For me I'm not the biggest fan of Lucas, never have been either. Here are my reasons.
Firstly I find him one dimensional. He can disrupt opposition attacks provided the game isn't too intense. He may win the ball and give it short. After that I'm struggling. In those high intensity games I find he goes missing. When the pressure builds I find that attacking players just seem to breeze past him. He seems very heavy footed to me.
Also when we have the ball what does he bring to our game? Not a huge amount in my book. He doesn't seem to have a great passing range, again it looks heavy and he's a million miles from being the player we need. That is one that keeps possession ticking over , always available, the out ball for everyone and the ability to probe etc.
It's because of these limitations and this years poor form that I'm afraid to say that he has a lot of work to convince me otherwise of his overall usefulness. I would also say that good players tend to attract some transfer rumours but in all his time I cant remember a single snippet anywhere. That alone tells me that people look and think they can do better elsewhere.
Any thoughts anyone?