Bolton Wanderers Message Board
You're wasting your time trying to discuss anything with Kipper, WS, he gets his opinions from the Daily Nazi, so doesn't have the ability to think for himself.
"Well, all that matters is, did the Police believe he was armed and dangerous. The fact he didn't actually have a gun in his hand at the time is irrelevant."
One policeman believed he had a gun in his hand, the one who shot him, none of the others, trained firearms officers, did.
According to the shooter, he first shot Duggan in the arm carrying the gun, as he went down he shot him again. The gun was found 21 feet away in a field, so, if the shooter is to be believed, he shot him in the gun arm but he still managed to throw it 21 feet, even though no-one actually saw it being thrown.
Coroner's juries work on a different principle to criminal juries, they gave the cop the benefit of the doubt, even though they knew, from later evidence, that Duggan wasn't carrying a gun. They gave him the benefit that he THOUGHT he saw a gun.
Remember the first statement, that Duggan had shot an officer? This enquiry isn't over, the IPCC is next.
One caveat here .... I don't give a fluck about Duggan, he was an #$%$ who won't be missed, and good riddance, but that doesn't excuse the police when they execute someone then lie about it, any one of us, or our kids, could be next, whether they are criminals or not, but especially if they are black.
"Personally I'm still laughing at you believing Berbatov is the best player in the world."
Hahaha!! Laughing at your own lies, Frodo, whatever next, insulting black people?
'Name a better player ..... then prove it'
'there's no better player'
You on Berbatov only yesterday (Taken from the Arsenal board, as you well know).
Oh dear oh dear.
Oh dear.....so, lets get this straight....you make things up and litter the boards with your pathetic posts, just to fill that HUGE VOID that is your 'life'.
That's that then.
Glad we got that sorted Rikki.
Have a most fulfilling day old fruit.
Oh....and don't go hurting any kids along the way.
Come on now, New Year's Eve/Day and posting on here?
How sad is that?
Sad, sad, sad!
Perhaps Altree will get the thread deleted because it's making a tit of the old fruit?
Had Caulker , Whittingham and Hendo at current list, so Caz, Mertesacker and Jack in with the existing Podolski (off the bench for Welbeck), Sagna and Ozil.
Yeah bought Gnab @6, but kept Welbeck, so could go 3-5-2 and bench 'beck @Chelsk, got Wes Brown too, becoming a tad worried @Ward's central MF role, seems less tackles/intercepts? Give him the h) Stoke game to prove me wrong or he's gone sadly.
Very early thinking on wk 22;
The difference is, Kipper, that I don't pretend to be someone else, when I get a new ID I post as me, you, on the other hand, have had many IDs you've denied are you .... Eddy, Gert, Lenny, Questionmarx, Black Man Ray, wizzbilly .... and many more!
...one last thought...this was posted by Kipper Roy Lenny Eddy tonight...
"Now I am not even sure that these e-mails full of hate and bullying you say you receive are actually real! ..... But if they are then they are not from my kind hands"
...I forwarded you the email....I know you didn't think it was that bad....but .Adrian did and Janet said I ought to take it to the Police....you're the only one from Crime posting on this board....apart from Rikk...who will also be accused or lying,..as I have...
...will you tell the truth...?
My two peneth worth on the disallowed Newcastle goal.
3 players in an offside position
A shot blasted across the bodies of those players
One player many yards offside but 2 players that from Harts view point were 'probably' offside.
Either of those 2 players could have touched the ball or arched out the way.
They made very slight evasive moves to ensure they did not touch it.
Hart did not know to dive or try and save it if they touched it.
In my opinion there was enough justification for the ref to say that one of those offside players was close enough to the shot to have been interfering with play.
Why all the fuss. It's not as if it was bad decision of the century, even if you believe the Ref was wrong?
The biggest talking point should be how Tiotte (however it's spelt), stayed on the pitch after the straight Red foul on Nasri?
Players don't appeal for a penalty every time these days, especially if they have dived or had a touch but gone down too easily. If this is the case they know they risk a booking.
And for me, the same as a defender does now, who thinks an attacker has run from an offside position.........keep playing and play to the whistle. Yes they may raise an arm at the same time to try and say "hey Ref"......but keepers in a one on one point whilst positioning themselves for the save.
I think the offside rule as it is can be just fine. Attackers need to know they can't crowd the keeper or be in a position to potentially touch the ball. In other words, they can be offside but not anywhere near the shot or line of sight. If they are, rule the goal out, if not, it stands.
Pundits today claiming the rules are far too complicated? For me football rules are just about the easiest sport to Ref there is..........especially compared to Rugby.