Oh look, the three stooges, booby, appy and dopey, you lot should get together over the sc...
Oh look, the three stooges, booby, appy and dopey, you lot should get together over the school holidays and swap stories about how you were too dumb to get decent jobs, and how you've spent years on the dole, except dopey, who wangled a £66 a week pension to look after his "sick" wife.
With a lol lol here, and a lol lol there, here a lol, there a lol, everywhere a lol lol ....... PMSLAADOLLDEF !!!
Not content with being a racist, the turnip farmer now turns his anger onto an 18 year old...
Not content with being a racist, the turnip farmer now turns his anger onto an 18 year old girl with a possible medical condition that blurs the certainty of her gender.
This should all have been kept private, the IAAC should have known what racist arseholes like fatso and turnip farmers would do to this.
Let's hope this is sorted out soon, and this poor girl can get on with her life.
As to the turnip farmer's comments about her times ... she's 18, her improvements, at that age, are common.
Disgusting stuff from the Bristol idiot, if he really is a father he should be ashamed of himself, and the government should question his kids to find out if they've been molested by him.
These are some of his quotes since 20th August.
20th Aug: There are many more people behi...
These are some of his quotes since 20th August.
20th Aug: There are many more people behind the plot than just Abdel Baset al-Megrahi
21st Aug: Just like you i am not privy to the evidence, other than that that was in the media.
(He later claims I get all my information from the media, and attempts to ridicule me for it, in spite of my having referred to non-media sources.)
21st Aug: His comrade was found NOT guilty........He was found GUILTY. That in my book constitutes a fair trial.
21st Aug: Now YOU show me some evidence that he is innocent.
(At this time I pointed him to the report by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission)
21st Aug: A good post Butch
24th Aug: I have seen so called evidence that only amounts to a conspiracy theory........no facts.
(No mention of the SCCRC report, even though he was supplied with a link, he didn't read it.)
24th Aug: I am happy to believe that two suspects were tried in a neutral country.
(Ignoring the fact that it was Scottish territory, Scottish judges, and Scottish everything else.)
24th Aug: I think the weight of evidence against a safe conviction is based on unconfirmed rumours and stories, not facts.
24th Aug: You can't supress the facts in nations with free speach. If the weight of "provable" evidence was in his favour, it would have covered the press like a rash.
5th Sep: And what value would they get out of failing to bring the guilty bomber to justice, so framing an innocent man?
5th Sep: I'm not saying the justice system does not make mistakes.........But there is a whole world of difference between making a mistake and framing an innocent man.
5th Sep: Bearing in mind that to frame Magrahi would have needed to collaboration of many nations intelligence forces.
5th Sep: Nah! I just don't buy it.
5th Sep: You have read page after page of theories dressed up as facts by a journalist who, as said, specialises in this kind of thing.
(Referring to John Pilger, a report he only posted the day before, ignoring the two weeks I'd been saying he was innocent.)
(He was then asked a question ... "Name the evidence presented against Magrahi, and, seeing as you've studied both sides, name the counter evidence?")
6th Sep: So you convince me that, if i tell you my sources and a more in depth opinion
(He was then asked to answer the question, no links or sources were needed, he claimed he had read both sides, now he could prove it.)
(His next post was just childish insults, no answers.)
(At this point Nige, who had just spent the day studying evidence, reiterated the points I had raised two weeks earlier, kipper replies ...)
7th Sep: Some excellent points Nig.
(So when I made the same points they were rubbish, when Nige makes them they're 'excellent'.)
7th Sep: All I/we know is what was reported and any evidence that doesn't look to hold true or have to many cracks in, could be not what it seems, or 100% fact.
7th Sep: All any of us can do is look at the reasons sources say the conviction is safe, and the reasons other sources say the conviction is unsafe.
(Which he still hasn't done, or named any evidence ... for or against.)
7th Sep: I agree that there is good reason to dig deeper into some of the evidence ..
(So now he suddenly agrees.)
7th Sep: As for the argument that the clothes he bought were the wrong size.
(This was never mentioned.)
7th Sep: And i also doubt that Megrahi's profile and description was widespread enough to have him picked out in an ID parade.
(He didn't know that the CIA showed the shopkeeper his photo, and it was all over the papers in Malta, because of the connection.)
7th Sep: But the clothes and ID are small parts of the evidence that convicted him, although still worthy of re-examination.
(But he still can't answer as to what this other evidence is.) .
Hahaha, tied up in knots!!
Only read the first post ... yeah, pull the other one.
You ha...
Hahaha, tied up in knots!!
Only read the first post ... yeah, pull the other one.
You had no intention of debating this with anyone, cos you know fuck all about it.
You're done kipper, finished, I bet you wish you'd left me on pretend ignore, then you wouldn't have been so comprehensively humiliated.
You have been proven, beyond all reasonable doubt, to be a bullshitting wally!
Not one iota of this case do you know anything about, not one .... you just made it up as you went along, now EVERYONE can see what a bullshitting fool you are.
