Oh, and was that not Nadal, who bumped into Rosol? It­ must have felt great, being under-height...

Rosol ALSO said, that some days he knows he vill be­ beaten by a No 500 player. If Rafa cannot deliver, it­ is a bad luck, if someone else can't they are­ rubbish...Said by those, who will never succeed in­ anything...At least Olayinka is is pretty, so she is­ excused!

It s the 45 min. Break for roof gave Rosol energy and­ fresh spirit for the 5th set. And Nadal flow of energy­ was suddenly broken. Actually Nadal was unlucky on­ that day, he did not play well as usual, especially­ when he failed near the net.

Mr super hero (Rosol) has some kinda krip tonight ­ playing with Kohlschreiber ha ,,,,,, after being so­ aggressive playing with rafa ,,,, I really dont no ­ wt happened to Rafa ,,,,, but I guess if dat Rosol­ plays Novak or even Tsonga both will never let him­ win ,,,,, but sadly tough luck 4 Rafa : (

I had hopes last year at Wimbledon that, we couldve had­ a rematch after that vintage Federer performance in­ French Open semis before that. I didn't mind him­ losing yet again in the final, could've happened if­ he was the same age as.Nadal but that loss against­ Tsonga was just plain annoying, as it followed an­ uninspiring semi final with Novak at his best.

Nadals comment were right when he said Rosol was­ arrogant and even Rosols on words killed him. In the­ interview after beating Rafa he felt like a God and­ said he can beat anyone and even after he lost today he­ still said the same thing. Clearly its not true as he­ didnt win today. All his energy and arrogance was sent­ on Nadal. Som1 needs to teach him about publice­ performance..

To be fair anyone on Novaks side of the draw last year­ wouldn't have made the final the way he was on­ form, so if nadal was on that side I would say the last­ couple of finals would have ben novak and federer.

@Scott, man, I am the biggest Federer supporter­ you'd find but it's been quite obvious lately­ that he's been messing up under pressure a lot­ against Novak and Nadal through his own silly faults.­ Remember against Tsonga last year? He looked so­ effortless even in that loss, the grace is still there­ but he has a tendency to become complacent he is a­ couple of sets up, the Tsonga match painted a clear­ picture of his recent attempts at salvaging the number­ one spot back again, taking it too easy and losing­ silly points crucial moments which wouldn't have­ happened, say, about 3 years ago. Then there's the­ dreaded backhand slices issue, he barely can keep them­ up anymore. But he is still the most attractive player­ to watch. Why do you think hardcore Nadal fans get­ jealous? For me, after last year's disappointment,­ not sure if he would manage another Grandslam win? I­ would love him to.

Risalat what's wrong with federer? He is the third­ on the consistent scale behind nadal and Novak, He­ still gets to semis and finals of tournaments.

same old story as expected. am not surprised at all.­ the same thing happened many times before. this time it­ was rafa's unlucky day. and the rest are thanking­ rosol for it.

Each miracle lasts a few days and Rosol's lasted 2­ days. It seems Kohlschreiber is in great form, he­ defeated Nadal and now Rosol, for me it is pleasant­ surprise. I wonder if Nadal watched this match, if yes,­ he should be very angry on himself for he allowed to­ Rosol to eliminate him.

Well now we know - one hit wonder, he would have beaten­ Roger also - not sure about Novak though. What a class­ player Philip is though, really enjoyed his game. But­ again I ask where is the energy and the adrenalin from­ Thursday's match? strange! very subdued today, and­ low on energy! and for kenny who asked why he is not on­ centre court - he was only on centre because he was­ playing Rafa. Same if Rafa had come through, Philip­ would have played on centre today. So sorry Rosul­ didn't meet roger, if he almost lost to the­ frenchman and battled to beat him, Rosul would have­ creamed him like he did Rafa.

If he can maintain the tenacity that he showed against­ Nadal, I won't be surprised if Rosol ends up in the­ top 30 by the end of 2013 and a win today would've­ been reassuring. But the way he played today, it can go­ either way. I'm sure we all want him to prosper

What a complete and shock this result is.........NOT! ­ Star extinguished - like I've stated, there's a­ reason he is ranked 100! I'm guessing that's­ the last we'll hear of Mr....oops forgotten him­ already!

Now the real question is where does Rosol go from here?­ we will see how he does after this.

That's it finita la comedia. Had Rosol gone trough­ he would have proved that prevailing Nadal was not a­ one off thing. Right now it seems he bought the farm­ for nothing.

Just watching the Rosol's match, but very­ disappointed.. he was playing as true number 100, not­ the man who has beaten Nadal in the 2nd round...

Yeah I would agree nadal didn't look like he was­ all there, to me what hurt nadal in the 5 set and the­ same result could of still happened is the delay with­ the roof.

@Scott, He would probably have beaten Federer,­ narrowly, but I just don't see it against Novak­ with him being in the form of his life, he would've­ made Rosol play for it, be damn sure he would've­ made him think. It just looked too easy against Nadal­ apart from one set (6-2). I hadn't seen Nadal that­ subdued in a long long time. I can't wait for US­ OPEN this year, need me a vicious dose of Novak-Nadal­ final, also can't rule out Federer and Del Potro

why is rorol not playing centre court???? nadal would b­ if he won ,?????