Liverpool Message Board
you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
Would you honestly want Abramovich as an owner? I'm not so sure myself. Ok he's lifted Chelsea into a position where they can and have won trophies but on the face of it the future looks a bit bleak to me unless Abramovich wants to pile even more money in.
It doesn't sit right with me that the marks of Chelsea's succes are Terry, Lampard, Drogba and a few others. Yes they should be remembered and applauded but what happens as they start to decline? The management, club set up, ideals and philosophies are all lost or don't even exist.
He'd pump in more money for a start. A new stadium could on the way to being built? Better players would be here.
However we know Abramovich has an impatient streak in him, that if the manager doesn't win the title every season they're sacked..
I'd take his money, but agree the rest of what he brings I'd rather do without. Put it this way, if Roman was our owner we'd not have discussions about whether Carroll or Henderson were good buys and should Kenny, DC or anyone else be accountable for them, because when it comes to big transfers Roman buys based on his personal whim rather than trust managers or directors of football to take responsibility.